Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The junctions of pension reforms: Russian and international experience
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-9-5-39
Abstract
Recent decision to raise retirement age in Russia is compared with alternative ways of pension system adjustment to population ageing. We conclude that postponing retirement was superior in terms of public welfare as compared to increasing public spending on pensions or lowering pension size relative to wages. Unlike advanced countries, which apply mainly a combination of higher effective retirement age, less generous pension benefits, and higher pension spending, Russia used various adjustment tools in sequence: sharp decline in pensions to wage ratio in 2002—2007 was followed by a marked increase in pension spending (which hiked almost 3 p.p. of GDP over 2007—2017). Some 2/3 of this growth was attributable to the cut in other spending (mainly “productive”, i.e. growth-enhancing), and 1/3 was financed by a redistribution of income from employees to pensioners. The general decision to raise retirement age thus was fully justified, but its parameters look reasonable only on average. Estimates based on cross-country analysis evidence that retirement age matching healthy life indicators anticipated for Russia would be 63/62 for men/women. Actual decision to increase retirement age to 65/60 maintains sharp gender distortions: the retirement age will remain too low for women and will get too high for men. Fiscal effect of higher retirement age are calculated by comparing pension spending ensuring constant pension to wage ratio under the old and new retirement ages. We find that this effect will stabilize around 3% of GDP in some 10 years after the start of reform. A bulk of this effect is in a sense “virtual”, as it mainly makes possible to evade further increase in pension spending. “Genuine” effect can be estimated as some 1% of GDP — these are public funds saved and available for different purposes, say for supporting programs increasing healthy life expectancy.
About the Author
Evsey T. Gurvich
Economic Expert Group; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Vishnevsky A., Vasin S., Ramonov A. (2012). Retirement age and life expectancy in the Russian Federation. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 88—109. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-9-88-109
2. Gorlin Yu. M., Lyashok V. Yu. (2019). Pension gambit. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2 (42), pp. 177—186. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2019-42-2-7
3. Gorlin Yu. M., Grishina E. E., Lyashok V. Yu., Fedorov V. V. (2017). Increase in retirement age: Experience of foreign countries and the assessment of the effects for Russia. Financial Journal, No. 6, pp. 85—98. (In Russian).
4. Gorlin Yu., Lyashok V., Maleva T. (2018). Pension age increase: Positive effects and possible risks. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 148—179. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-1-06
5. Gurvich E. T. (2019). Pension policy and population ageing. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 2 (42), pp. 177—186. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2019-42-2-10
6. Gurvich E. T., Ivanova M. A. (2018). Economic effect of population ageing and pension reforms. Financial Journal, No. 5, pp. 9—22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2018-5-9-22
7. Ivanova M., Balaev A., Gurvich E. (2017). Implications of higher retirement age for the labor market. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 22—39. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-3-22-39
8. Lyashok V., Nazarov V., Oreshkin M. (2016). Factors of pension growth in modern Russia. Financial Journal, No. 1, pp. 7—21. (In Russian).
9. Maleva T. M., Sinyavskaya O. V. (2005). Pension reform in Russia: History, outcomes, prospects. Moscow: Pomatur. (In Russian).
10. Rosstat (2018). Population of Russia outlook through 2035. Moscow: Rosstat. (In Russian).
11. Sinyavskaya O. V. (2017). Russian pension system in the context of demographic challenges and constraints. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 562—591. (In Russian).
12. Soloviev A. K., Popov V. Yu. (2016). Actuarial study of demographic factors contributing to the higher retirement age. Vestnik Finansovogo Universiteta, No. 4, pp. 42—55. (In Russian).
13. Abeliansky A., Strulik H. (2019). Long-run improvements in human health: Steady but unequal. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, [forthcoming].
14. Barnes S., Bouis R., Briard P., Dougherty S., Eris M. (2013). The GDP impact of reform: A simple simulation framework. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 834. https://doi.org/10.1787/18151973
15. Bloom D., Canning D., Moore M. (2014). Optimal retirement with increasing longevity . Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 838—858. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12060
16. Bonenkamp J., Meijdam L., Ponds E., Westerhout E. (2017). Ageing-driven pension reforms. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 953—976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0637-0
17. Börsch-Supan A. (2012). Entitlement reforms in Europe: Policy mixes in the current pension reform process. NBER Working Paper, No. 18009.
18. Carone G., Eckefeldt P., Giamboni L., Laine V., Pamies Sumner S. (2016). Pension reforms in the EU since the early 2000’s: Achievements and challenges ahead. European Commission Discussion Paper, No. 042. http://dx.doi.org/10.2765/620267
19. Chybalski F., Marcinkiewicz E. (2016). The replacement rate: An imperfect indicator of pension adequacy in cross-country analyses. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 99—117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0892-y
20. Clements B., Coady D., Eich F., Gupta S., Kangur A., Shang B., Soto M. (2012). The challenge of public pension reform in advanced and emerging market economies. IMF Occasional Paper, No. 275.
21. European Commission (2018). The 2018 ageing report. Institutional Paper, No. 079.
22. Filgueira F., Manzi P. (2017). Pension and income transfers for old age. Inter- and intra-generational distribution in comparative perspective. United Nations Social Policy Series, No. 225.
23. Fournier J.-M. (2016). The positive effect of public investment on potential growth. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1347.
24. Grech A. (2018). What makes pension reforms sustainable? Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082891
25. Haan P., Prowse V. (2014). Longevity, life-cycle behavior and pension reform. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 178, No. P3, pp. 582—601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.038
26. Hauner D. (2008) Macroeconomic effects of pension reform in Russia. IMF Working Paper, No. WP/08/201.
27. Holzmann R. (2013). Global pension systems and their reform: Worldwide drivers, trends and challenges. International Social Security Review, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 1—29. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12007
28. Hsu Y.-H. (2017). The welfare effects of pension reforms in an aging economy. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 7, pp. 652—670. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2017.75049
29. ILO (2017). World social protection report 2017—19. International Labor Organization.
30. Karam P., Muir D., Pereira J., Tuladhar A. (2010). Macroeconomic effects of public pension reforms. IMF Working Paper, No. WP/10/97.
31. Lee R. (2016). Macroeconomics, aging and growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 22310.
32. Martinez-Vazquez J. (2006). Who bears the burden of taxes on labor income in Russia? International Studies Program Working Paper, No. 06-21, Georgia State University,
33. Nerlich C., Schroth J. (2018). The economic impact of population ageing and pension reforms. ECB Economic Bulletin, No. 2, pp. 85—109.
34. OECD (2017). Pensions at a glance 2017: OECD and G20 Indicators. Paris: OECD Publ.
35. Okawa Y., Sanghi A. (2018). Potential growth outlook and options for the Russian Federation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8663.
36. Prettner K., Canning D. (2012). Increasing life expectancy and optimal retirement: Does population aging necessarily undermine economic prosperity? PGDA Working Paper, No. 91.
37. Salomon J. A., Wang H., Freeman M. K., Vos T., Flaxman A. D., Lopez A. D, Murray C. J. L. (2012). Healthy life expectancy for 187 countries, 1990—2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, Vol. 380, No. 9859, pp. 2144—2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61690-0
38. SSA (2017). Social security programs throughout the world: Africa, 2017 (SSA Publication No. 13-11803). Washington, DC: Social Security Administration.
39. SSA (2018a). Social security programs throughout the world: Europe, 2018 (SSA Publication No. 13-11801). Washington, DC: Social Security Administration.
40. SSA (2018b). Social security programs throughout the world: The Americas, 2017 (SSA Publication No. 13-11804). Washington, DC: Social Security Administration.
41. SSA (2019). Social security programs throughout the world: Asia and the Pacific, 2018 (SSA Publication No. 13-11802). Washington, DC: Social Security Administration.
42. UN (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision [DVD edition]. UN Population Division.
Review
For citations:
Gurvich E.T. The junctions of pension reforms: Russian and international experience. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(9):5-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-9-5-39
Views:
2694
Email this article 
