Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
The making of behavioral economics: A subjective view (On the book by R. Thaler “Misbehaving. The making of behavioral economics”)
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-8-145-160
Abstract
Having started from actively opposing standard (neoclassical) economics, behavioral economics has, by now, reached quite wide academic recognition, having become a part of the mainstream economics itself. Broad usage of behavioral ideas and approaches in government (and corporate) policy has been named “liberal paternalism” and Richard Thaler, the 2017 Nobel prize winner and former adviser to president Barack Obama has probably contributed more to developing and popularizing it than anyone else. This paper offers a review of his book “Misbehaving” (its Russian translation was published in 2017).
About the Author
Yu. V. Avtonomov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Avtonomov V. S., Avtonomov Y. V. (2016). A general theory of methodenstreits in economics. Obshestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, No. 4, pp. 5—20. (In Russian).
2. Kapelyushnikov R. (2013). Behavioral economics and “new paternalism” (Part I). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 66 — 90. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-9-66-90
3. Thaler R. (2017). Misbehaving. The making of behavioral economics. Moscow: “E” Publ. (In Russian).
4. Angner E. (2017 [2012]). A course in behavioral economics, 2nd edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Avtonomov V. S., Avtonomov Y. V. (2019). Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625206
6. Blaug M. (2002). Ugly currents in modern economics. In: U. Maki fed.). Fact and fiction in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35 — 56.
7. Cartwright E. (2018 [2011, 2014]). Behavioral economics, 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.
8. Cole S., Fernando A. N. (2012). The value of advice: Evidence from mobile phone-based agricultural extension. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 13 — 047.
9. De Bondt W. F. M., Thaler R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 793 — 805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x
10. Duflo E., Kremer M., Robinson J. (2011). Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review, Vol. 101, No. 6, 2350—2390. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2350
11. Fisher I. (1930). Theory of interest: As determined by impatience to spend income and opportunity to invest it. Clifton: Augustus M. Kelly.
12. Grether D. M., Plott C. R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 623 — 638.
13. Jensen M. C. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 6, No. 2/3, pp. 95 — 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(78)90025-9
14. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 237—251. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0034747
15. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 1325 — 1348.
16. Knetsch J. L., Sinden J. A. (1984). Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 507 — 521. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885962
17. Lee C. M. C., Shleifer A., Thaler R. H. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 75 — 109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03746.x
18. Samuelson P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155 — 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967612
19. Strotz R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 165 — 180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295722
20. Thaler R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. New York: W.W. Norton.
21. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, Vol. 185, No. 4157, pp. 1124 — 1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
23. Van Overtveldt J. (2007). The Chicago School: how the University of Chicago assembled the thinkers who revolutionized economics and business. Agate Publishing. Wilkinson N. (2007). An introduction to behavioral economics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
24. Wilkinson N., Klaes M. (2017 [2012]). An introduction to behavioral economics, 3rd edition. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Review
For citations:
Avtonomov Yu.V. The making of behavioral economics: A subjective view (On the book by R. Thaler “Misbehaving. The making of behavioral economics”). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(8):145-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-8-145-160
Views:
1657
Email this article 
