

Russia in the changing conditions of world trade: A structural view at the new positioning
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-8-5-29
Abstract
This article discusses changes in the structure of world trade and the features of integration of Russian economy into the global exchange of goods and services. There is an increasing competition on global markets of goods and services that require high-skilled labor. During the last two decades, the structure of Russian export has not gained positive diversification shifts and comparative advantage in high value added goods. The article discusses the following problems of Russian trade policy: an overestimation of traditional sectors’ export potential, a lack of attention to the problems of integration into global value chains and international industrial cooperation, and an untapped potential of fast-growing medium-sized companies. The agenda of prospective Russian trade policy might include a transition to a broad interpretation of trade policy oriented towards long-term structural changes in the economy and a change in the positioning of sectors in global value chains, combined with measures to develop human capital and institutions, determining the further formation of the service sector.
About the Authors
Yury V. SimachevRussian Federation
Moscow
Aleksandr V. Daniltsev
Russian Federation
Moscow
Anna A. Fedyunina
Russian Federation
Moscow, St. Petersburg
Marina K. Glazatova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Mikhail G. Kuzyk
Russian Federation
Moscow
Nikolai N. Zudin
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Zasimova L., Kuznetsov B., Kuzyk M. et al. (2008). Problems of transition of industry to the path of innovation development: Microeconomic analysis of the behavior of firms, the dynamics and structure of demand for technological innovation. Scientific Reports: Independent Economic Analysis, No. 201. Moscow: Moscow Public Science Foundation. (In Russian).
2. Zemtsov S., Maskaev F. (2018). Fast-growing firms in Russia: Characteristics and factors of growth. Innovatsii, No. 6, pp. 30 — 38. (In Russian).
3. NRU HSE (2018a). Structural changes in the Russian economy and structural policy. Analytical report. Moscow: NRU HSE. (In Russian).
4. NRU HSE (2018b). Industrial policy in Russia: New conditions and possible agenda (The report of NRU HSE). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 5—28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-5-28
5. Yudanov A. Yu. (2010). Embodiments of entrepreneurial spirit: “Gazelle-firms” in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, No. 5, pp. 91 — 108. (In Russian).
6. UNCTAD (2018). Trade and development report 2018. Power, platforms and the illusion of free trade. New York; Geneva.
7. Anyadike-Danes M., Bonner K., Hart M., Mason C. (2009). Measuring business growth: High-growth firms and their contribution to employment in the UK. London: NESTA.
8. Brander J. A. (1995). Strategic trade policy. In: G. M. Grossman, K. Rogoff (ed.). Handbook of international economics, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1395—1455.
9. Gereffi G. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University. Durham, North Carolina.
10. Hausmann R., Hwang J., Rodrik D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1—25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
11. Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, No. 26, pp. 10570—10575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106
12. Hidalgo C. A., Klinger B., Barabasi A. L., Hausmann R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, Vol. 317, No. 5837, pp. 482 — 487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581
13. Holzl W., Friesenbichler K. (2007). Are gazelles more innovative than other firms? Mimeo, WIFO, Austria.
14. Kuznetsov Y., Sabel C. (2014). New open economy industrial policy: Making choices without picking winners. In: M. Dutz et al. (ed.). Making innovation policy work: Learning from experimentation. Washington, DC: World Bank; Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 35 — 47.
15. Lee K. (2017). Smart specialization with short-cycle technologies and implementation strategies to avoid target and design failures. In: S. Radosevic et al. (ed.). Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Academic Press, pp. 201—224.
16. Lee K., Szapiro M., Mao Z. (2018). From global value chains (GVC) to innovation systems for local value chains and knowledge creation. The European Journal of Development Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 424 — 441. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0111-6
17. Lin J. Y. (2011). From flying geese to leading dragons: New opportunities and strategies for structural transformation in developing countries. WIDER Lecture. Washington, DC: World Bank.
18. Lin J. Y. (2012). Structural economics. A framework for rethinking development and policy. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
19. Monge-Gonzalez R., Torres-Carballo F. (2015). The dynamics of entrepreneurship in Costa Rica: An analysis of firm entry, exit, and growth rates. Inter-American Development Bank Discussion Paper, No. IDB-DP-367.
20. Orgun B. O. (2012). Strategic trade policy versus free trade. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 58, pp. 1283 — 1292. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.sbspro.2012.09.1111
21. Radosevic S., Curaj A., Gheorghiu R., Andreescu L., Wade I. (eds.) (2017). Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
22. Rodrik D. (2011). Comments on “New Structural Economics” by Justin Yifu Lin. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 227—229. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkr008
23. Rodrik D. (2018). New technologies, global value chains, and the developing economies. Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series, No. 1.
24. Simon H. (2009). Hidden champions of the twenty-first century: The success strategies of unknown world market leaders. New York: Springer-Verlag.
25. St-Jean E., Julien P.-A., Audet J. (2008). Factors associated with growth changes in “gazelles”. Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol. 16, No. 02, pp. 161 — 188. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218495808000089
26. UNIDO (2017/ Industrial development report 2018. Demand for manufacturing: Driving inclusive and sustainable industrial development. Vienna.
27. Volchkova N. (2013). How costly is exporting: An empirical assessment of trade model with heterogeneous firms? Available at SSRN: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2243135
28. World Bank Group, Institute of Developing Economies, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Research Center of Global Value Chains within the University of International Business and Economics, World Trade Organization (2017). Global value chain development report 2017. Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications.
29. Yalcin E., Felbermayr G., Kinzius L. (2017). Hidden protectionism: Non-tariff barriers and implications for international trade. ifo Forschungsberichte, No. 91. ifo Institute, Munich.
Review
For citations:
Simachev Yu.V., Daniltsev A.V., Fedyunina A.A., Glazatova M.K., Kuzyk M.G., Zudin N.N. Russia in the changing conditions of world trade: A structural view at the new positioning. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(8):5-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-8-5-29