|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Informal taxes for the provision of public goods in Russian regions
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-1-124-134
Abstract
The article studies the example of informal taxes in Russia — a phenomenon when citizens provide voluntary payments for financing local public goods. This so-called “self-taxation” has attracted attention in 2017 upon the adoption of the changes to the local government law, which simplified the procedure for local referendum. The article outlines institutional reasons for the emergence of this mechanism and its risks for Russia and other countries. The empirical analysis exploits the data by the Russian Statistical Agency and the Russian Treasury. Our results reveal a positive relationship between the coefficient of regional cofinancing of municipal projects and the growth in the share of voluntary payments in the non-tax revenues of local budgets. Therefore, self-taxation by citizens may be viewed as a signalling tool for enhancing the quality of local public goods.
About the Author
G. E. Besstremyannaya
Center for Economic and Financial Research at New Economic School; Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina E. Besstremyannaya
Moscow
References
1. Balynin I. V. (2015). The use of self-taxes of citizens in forming the revenues of local budgets. Finansy i Upravleniye, No. 2, pp. 53—62. (In Russian).
2. Galchenko V. V. (ed.) (2008). Citizens’ participation in local governments. Methodological textbook.Moscow: Avangard. (In Russian).
3. Emetz M. I., Makarov M. A. (2016). The self-taxation of citizens as a source of local budget revenues. Ekonomika i Menedgment Innovatsionnykh Tehnologii, No. 12. (In Russian).
4. Sergienko N. S. (2015). Self-taxation as a form of voluntary participation of the population i n socioeconomic develop ment of settlements. Sovremennye Issledovaniya Sotsialnykh Problem, No. 1, pp. 266—270. (In Russian).
5. Sivintseva O. V., Budnik K. V. (2018). Participatory instruments in RF subjects: Self-taxation and initiative budgeting. Ars Administrandi, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 96—127. (In Russian).
6. Besley T., Persson T. (2013). Taxation and development. In: A. Auerbach, R. Chetty, M. Feldstein, E. Saez (eds.). Handbook of public economics, Vol. 5, pp. 51—110. Elsevier.
7. Bice D. C., Hoyt W. H. (2000). The impact of mandates and tax limits on voluntary contributions to local public services: An application to fire-protection services . National Tax Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 79—104.
8. Bird R. M. (1990). Intergovernmental finance and local taxation in developing countries: Some basic considerations for reformers. Public Administration and Development , Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 277—288.
9. Brunner E., Sonstelie J. (2003). School finance reform and voluntary fiscal federalism . Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 87, No. 9—10, pp. 2157—2185.
10. Downes T. A., Figlio D. N. (1997). School finance reforms, tax limits, and student performance: Do reforms level up or dumb down?Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers, No. 1142—97. Madison, WI.
11. Ferris J. M. (1984). Coprovision: Citizen time and money donations in public service provision. Public Administration Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 324—333.
12. Gordon R., Li W. (2009). Tax structures i n developi ng countries: Many puzzles and a possible explanation. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 93, No. 7—8, pp. 855—866.
13. Olken B. A., Singhal M. (2011). Informal taxation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 1—28.
14. Winerip M. (2003). On education: Giving green or turning red. The New York Times, Feb. 26.
15.
Review
For citations:
Besstremyannaya G.E. Informal taxes for the provision of public goods in Russian regions. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019;(1):124-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-1-124-134
Views:
1440
Email this article 
