Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
What is Analytical Marxism?
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-9-121-138
Abstract
The paper written by a famous sociologist, one of the main advocates of analytical Marxism, analyzes this school of social and economic thought which emerged in the end of the 1970s. The author briefly outlines the history of analytical Marxism and explicates its distinctive characteristics which distinguish it from both neoclassical tradition and different heterodox schools of thought. The paper also shows the connections between analytical Marxism and Marxist theory. The author discusses modern interpretations of Marx’s conceptions and the influence of analytical Marxism on contemporary social and economic thought.
References
1. Analytical Marxism / Roemer J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
2. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press, 1978.
3. Bhaskar R. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press, 1979.
4. Bowles S., Gintis H. Democracy and Capitalism. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1986.
5. Bowles S., Gintis H. Contested Exchange // Politics & Society. 1990. Vol. 18, No 2. P. 165-222.
6. Brenner B. The agrarian Roots of European Capitalism // The Brenner Debate / Aston T. H., Philpon C. H. E. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. P. 2 13-327.
7. Burawoy M. Marxism without Micro-foundations // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 53-86.
8. Burawoy M. Politics and Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. L.: Verso, 1985.
9. Burawoy M. Should We Give Up on Socialism? // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 1. P. 58-76.
10. Carchedi G. Class Analysis and Social Research. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
11. Carling A. Rational Choice Marxism // New Left Review. 1986. No 160. P. 24-62.
12. Cohen G. A. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: a Defense. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.
13. Cohen G. A. The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom // Analytical Marxism / Roemer J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
14. Cohen G. History, Labor and Freedom. Oxford, 1989.
15. Cohen J., Rogers J. On Democracy. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983.
16. Elster J. Logic and Society. Contradictions and Possible Worlds. N.Y.: John Wiley, 1978.
17. Elster J. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
18. Jacoby R. The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of the Academe. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1987.
19. Kamolnick P. Classes: a Marxist Critique. N.Y.: General Hall, Inc., 1988.
20. Levine A. Arguing for Socialism. L.: Routledge and Kegan. Paul, 1984.
21. Levine A. The End of the State. L.: Verso, 1987.
22. Levine A., Sober E., Wright E. O. Marxism and Methodological Individualism // New Left Review. 1987. No 162. P. 67-84.
23. Levine A., Sober E., Wright E. O. Reconstructing Marxism. L.: Verso, 1992.
24. Miller R. W. Analyzing Marx. Morality, Power, and History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
25. Parijs Ph. van. Evolutionary Explanation in the Social Sciences: an Emerging Paradigm. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1981.
26. Przeworski A. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
27. Przeworski A. Class Production and Politics: a Reply to Burawoy // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 87-111.
28. Resnick S., Wolff R. Knowledge and Class. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.
29. Roemer J. A. General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.
30. Roemer J. Should Marxists be Interested in Exploitation? // Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1985. No 14.
31. Roemer J. Visions of Capitalism and Socialism // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 93-100.
32. Wright E. O. Classes. L.: New left Books, 1985.
33. Wright E. O. et al. The Debate on Classes. L.: Verso, 1989.
34. Wright E. O. The Comparative Project on Class Structure and Class Consciousness: an Overview // Acta Sociologica. 1989. Vol. 32, No 1. P. 3-22.
Review
For citations:
Wright E.O. What is Analytical Marxism? Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2007;(9):121-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-9-121-138
Views:
1584
Email this article 
