

Корпоративное управление и финансовая эффективность компании: мета-анализ
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-10-62-76
Аннотация
Вопрос о влиянии корпоративного управления на эффективность компании относится к наиболее актуальным аспектам теории фирмы и корпоративных финансов. В статье представлен мета-анализ эмпирических исследований, посвященных изучению взаимосвязи агрегированных показателей качества корпоративного управления и финансовой эффективности компании. Исследование проводится на глобальной выборке по материалам большой выборки развитых и развивающихся стран. Результаты исследования позволяют оценить подлинный уровень и механизмы данной взаимосвязи в зависимости от правового, политического и экономического контекста.
Об авторе
А. ГизатуллинРоссия
ассистент кафедры финансового менеджмента
Список литературы
1. Ahmed K., Courtis J. K. Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: A meta-analysis // The British Accounting Review. 1999. Vol. 31, No 1. P. 35-61.
2. Allouche J., Laroche P. A meta-analytical examination of the link between corporate social and financial performance // Cahier de recherché / Université Paris I - Panthéon -Sorbonne. 2005.
3. Anderson A., Gupta P. P. A cross-country comparison of corporate governance and firm performance nexus: Do financial structure and the legal system of a country matter? // Working paper / Lehigh University. 2006.
4. Bauer R., Günster N., Otten R. Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe // Journal of Asset Management. 2003. Vol. 5, No 2. P. 91-104.
5. Cornelius P. Corporate practices and national governance systems: What do country rankings tell us? // German Law Journal. 2005. Vol. 6, No 3. P. 583-604.
6. Dalton D. R., Daily C. M., Ellstrand A. E., Johnson J. L. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance // Strategic Management Journal. 1998. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 269-290.
7. Denis D. K., McConnell J. J. International corporate governance // Working paper / Purdue University. 2002; Claessens S. Corporate governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003.
8. Doidge C., Karolyi G. A., Stulz R. M. Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? // Journal of Financial Economics. 2007. Vol. 86, No 1. P. 1-39.
9. Durnev A., Kim E. H. The interplay of firm-specific factors and legal regimes in corporate governance and firm valuation // Working paper / University of Michigan. 2002.
10. Duval S. J., Tweedie R. L. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis // Biometrics. 2000. Vol. 56. P. 455-463.
11. Egger M., Smith G. D., Scheider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test // British Medical Journal. 1997. Vol. 316. P. 629-634.
12. Fan P. S. Review of literature and empirical research on corporate governance // Research paper / Monetary Authority of Singapore. 2004.
13. Glass G. V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research // Educational Researcher. 1976. Vol. 5. P. 3-8.
14. Gompers P. A., Ishii J. L., Metrick A. Corporate governance and equity prices // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2003. Vol. 118. P. 107-155.
15. Hay D., Knechel W. R., Wong N. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes // Working paper / University of Auckland. 2004.
16. Hedges L. V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1985.
17. Hunt M. How science takes stock. N. Y.: Russell Sage Foundation, 1997.
18. Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
19. Klapper L. F., Love I. Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets // Working paper No 2818 / World Bank. 2002.
20. Leal R. P. C. Governance practices and corporate value - A recent literature survey // Working paper / COPPEAD / UFRJ. 2004.
21. Lipsey M. W., Wilson D. B. Practical meta-analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Vol. 49. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
22. Meta-regression analysis. Issues of publication bias in economics / C. Roberts, T. D. Stanley (eds.) Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
23. Michaud D. W., Magaram K. A. Recent technical papers on corporate governance // Working paper / Brown University. 2006.
24. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis // Organization Studies. 2003. Vol. 24, No 3. P. 403-441.
25. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments / H. Rothstein, A. Sutton, M. Borenstein (eds.). Chichester, England: Wiley, 2005.
26. Renders A., Gaeremynck A. Corporate governance and performance: Controlling for sample selection bias and endogeneity // Working paper / Catholic University of Leuven. 2006.
27. Rhoades D. L., Rechner P. L., Sundaramurthy C. Board composition and financial performance: A meta-analysis of the influence of outside directors // Journal of Managerial Issues. 2000. Vol. 12. P. 76-91.
28. Rosenthal R. The 'file-drawer problem' and tolerance for null results // Psychological Bulletin. 1979. Vol. 86. P. 638-641.
29. Stanley T. D., Jarell S. B. Meta-regression analysis: A quantitative method of literature surveys // Journal of Economic Surveys. 2005. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 299-308.
30. Sбnchez-Ballesta J. P., Garcнa-Meca E. A meta-analytic vision of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance // Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2007. Vol. 15, No 5. P. 879-892.
31. The handbook of research synthesis / H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (eds.). N. Y.: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Гизатуллин А. Корпоративное управление и финансовая эффективность компании: мета-анализ. Вопросы экономики. 2008;(10):62-76. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-10-62-76
For citation:
Gizatullin A. Corporate Governance and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2008;(10):62-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-10-62-76