Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Structural Alternatives of Russia’s Social and Economic Development
https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-71-85
Abstract
The article contains a general comparative study of four strategies of social and economic development: "Inertia", "Renter", "Mobilization", and "Modernization". The context for comparison is explanation of correlation between adaptive features of Russia’s contemporary economic system and particularities of the mentioned strategies with corresponding ways of managing economic development problems. The comparison is based on description of strategies essence, ways and tools to achieve results. Perspectives of achieving strategic purposes as well as expected results of implementation of each strategy are shown. Special comparative study of four strategies on the base of development of competitive markets as one of strategic aims of the Russian government is presented.
About the Authors
A. Shastitko
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Bureau of Economic Analysis Foundation (BEA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Afontsev
MGIMO University; Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Plaksin
Bureau of Economic Analysis Foundation (BEA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Авдашева С. Б., Шаститко А. Е. Новое антимонопольное законодательство: результат стратегического взаимодействия? // Экономическая политика. 2007. № 3. С.72-91.
2. Влияние конкуренции и антимонопольного регулирования на процессы экономической модернизации в России/Под ред. С. Б. Авдашевой и В. Л. Тамбовцева; Бюро экономического анализа. М.: Теис, 2005.
3. Зингалес Л., Раджан Р. Спасение капитализма от капиталистов: Скрытые силы финансовых рынков -создание богатства и расширение возможностей/Институт комплексных стратегических исследований. М.: Теис, 2004.
4. Использование оценок регулирующего воздействия для совершенствования корпоративного законодательства/Под ред. Р. А. Кокорева, А. Е. Шаститко. М.: Теис, 2006.
5. Уильямсон О. Экономические институты капитализма. СПб.: Лениздат, 1996. С. 689.
6. Brown D. J., Earl J. S. Competition and Firm Performance: Lessons from Russia // Stockholm Institute of Transition Economy Working Paper 154. March 2000.
7. McGuire M. C., Olson M. The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force // Journal of Economic Literature. 1996. Vol. 34. P. 72-96.
8. Nickell S. J. Competition and Corporate Performance // Journal of Political Economy. 1996. Vol. 104. P. 724-796.
9. Nickell S. J., Wadhwani S., Wall M. Productivity Growth in UK Companies, 1975-1986 // European Economic Review. 1992. Vol. 36. P. 1055-1091.
Review
For citations:
Shastitko A., Afontsev S., Plaksin S. Structural Alternatives of Russia’s Social and Economic Development. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2008;(1):71-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2008-1-71-85
Views:
659
Email this article 
