Preview

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis for Evaluating Efficiency of Public Investment Projects (The Case of Sochi-2014 Winter Olympic Games)

https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-11-57-78

Abstract

The paper analyzes shortcomings of economic impact studies based mainly on input- output models that are often employed in Russia as well as abroad. Using studies about sport events in the USA and Olympic Games that took place during the last 30 years we reveal advantages of the cost-benefit analysis approach in obtaining unbiased assessments of public investments efficiency; the step-by-step method of cost-benefit analysis is presented in the paper as well. We employ the project of Sochi-2014 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games in Russia to evaluate its efficiency using cost-benefit analysis for five accounts (areas of impact), namely government, households, environment, economic development, and social development, and calculate the net present value of the project taking into account its possible alternatives. In conclusion we suggest several policy directions that would enhance public investment efficiency within the Sochi-2014 Olympics.

About the Author

I. Pilipenko
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Гланин И. Сочи в транспортном кольце // Время новостей. 2009. 4 авг. www.newstime.ru/2009/138/4/ 234457.html.

2. Клейнер Г. Б. Энергия Олимпиады // Прямые инвестиции. 2010. № 11. С. 14-15.

3. Ледовый дворец в день революции // Вечерняя Рязань. 2005. 3 нояб.

4. Министр Игорь Левитин проверил, как строится дорога Адлер-Красная Поляна // Российская газета. 2009. 30 янв. http://www.rg.ru/2009/01/30/levitin-anons.html.

5. МПР взыскало со строителей олимпийских объектов в Сочи 1, 8 млрд рублей / РИА Новости // Риан.Ру. 2010. 16 марта. http://eco.rian.ru/business/20100316/ 214729557.html.

6. Немцов Б. Е., Милов В. С. Сочи и Олимпиада: Независимый экспертный доклад. М., 2009.

7. Нуреев Р. М., Маркин Е. В. Издержки и выгоды олимпийских игр // Общественные науки и современность. 2010. № 1. С. 88-104.

8. Нуреев Р. М., Маркин Е. В. Олимпийский деловой цикл // Terra Economicus. 2008. Т. 6, № 3. С. 50-64.

9. Нуреев Р. М., Маркин Е. В. Эти разные олимпийские игры // Terra Economicus. Т. 7, № 3. С. 10-28.

10. Олимпийские объекты перепрофилируют и передвинут // Sostav.ru. 2011. 11 янв. http://www.sostav.ru/news/2011/01/11/cod9/.

11. Проект строительства дороги Адлер-Альпика-Сервис удешевили на 6% - Якунин // Интерфакс: Сочи. 2010. 10 дек. http://www.interfax.ru/realty/realtyinf.asp?id=168578&sec=1461.

12. Baade R. A., Matheson V. Bidding for the Olympics: Fool's Gold? // Transatlantic Sport: The Comparative Economics of North American and European Sports / C. Barros, M. Ibrahimo, S. Szymanski (eds.). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002. P. 127-151.

13. Boardman A. E., Greenberg D. H., Vining A. R., Weimer D. L. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Prentice Hall, 2006.

14. Bogetic Z., Smits K., Budina N., van Wijnbergen S. Long-Term Fiscal Risks and Sustainabilityin an Oil-Rich Country: The Case of Russia / The World Bank, Europe and Central Asia Region, PREM Department. 2010. March.

15. Crompton J. L. Economic Impact Analysis of Sports Facilities and Events: Eleven Sources of Misapplication // Journal of Sport Management. 1995. Vol. 9, No 1.

16. Economic Impact Study of the London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games, Final Report / Grant Thornton; Torkildsen Barclay; the Christel DeHaan Tourism; Travel Research Institute. East of England Development Agency, 2006. July.

17. Green D. A. Olympic Impacts: Should We Expect an Employment Boom? / Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives - British Columbia office. 2003. Feb.

18. Hudson I. The Use and Misuse of Economic Impact Analysis: The Case of Professional Sports // Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 2001. Vol. 25, No 1.

19. Krupenina G., Movshovich S., Bogdanova M. The Marginal Excess Burden of Taxes in the Russian Transition // Economic Education and Research Consortium, Russian Economic Research Program Working Paper. 1998. No 98/05.

20. Long J. G. Full Count: The Real Cost of Public Funding for Major League Sports Facilities // Journal of Sports Economics. 2005. May. P. 119-143.

21. Owen J. G. Estimating the Cost and Benefit of Hosting Olympic Games: What Can Beijing Expect from Its 2008 Games? // The Industrial Geographer. 2005. Vol. 3, No 1. P. 1-18.

22. Preuss H. Economics of the Olympic Games: Hosting the Games 1972-2000. Sydney: Walla Walla Press, 2000.

23. Rappaport J., WilkersonC. What Are the Benefits of Hosting a Major League Sports Franchise? // Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review. 2001. First Quarter. P. 55-86.

24. Shaffer M., Greer A., Mauboules C. Olympic Costs and Benefits. A Cost-Benefit Analysisof the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games / Canadian Center for Policy Alternatives - British Columbia office. 2003. Feb.

25. Siegfried J., Zimbalist A. The Economics of Sports Facilities and Their Communities // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2000. Vol. 14, No 3. P. 95-114.

26. Sochi 2014 Candidate City Bid books. 16 Themes / Sochi 2014 Olympic Committee. 2007. Theme 6. P. 95.

27. Sochi 2014. Report on the UNEP 2nd Expert Mission. 28-30 Jan., 2010 / United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2010.

28. The Economic Impact of the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games / Capital Projects Branch; Ministry of Competition, Science and Enterprise, Province of British Columbia; Honourable Rick Torpe, Minister. Vancouver, 2002.

29. Zimbalist A. Is It Worth It? Hosting the Olympic Games and Other Mega Sport Events Is an Honor Many Countries Aspire to - but Why? // Finance and Development. 2010. March.


Review

For citations:


Pilipenko I. The Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis for Evaluating Efficiency of Public Investment Projects (The Case of Sochi-2014 Winter Olympic Games). Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2011;(11):57-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-11-57-78

Views: 1024


ISSN 0042-8736 (Print)