<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2009-1-84-100</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-828</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ISSUES OF THEORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Революционное значение теории сложности и будущее экономической науки</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Complexity Revolution and the Future of Economics</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коландер</surname><given-names>Д.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Colander</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Профессор</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Миддлбери-колледж</institution><country>Соединённые Штаты Америки</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Middlebury College</institution><country>United States</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2009</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>01</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>84</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/828">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/828</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье представлен анализ изменений в теоретических и прикладных областях современной экономической науки, связанных с возникновением новых теоретических подходов, в частности, теории сложности и поведенческой экономики. Автор показывает, что в будущем экономисты отойдут от базовых предпосылок неоклассики и освоят многочисленные междисциплинарные подходы для изучения конкретных экономических вопросов. Эти постепенные трансформации должны серьезно поменять структуру экономического знания — формальное моделирование должно отойти на второй план, уступив место более прикладным областям науки.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper considers the change in theoretical and empirical research in modern economics. This change is driven by the emergence of new theoretical approaches associated with the complexity theory and behavioral economics. The author shows that in future economists will reject some basic assumptions of neoclassical economics and adopt many different interdisciplinary approaches in order to study concrete economic problems. These gradual transformations should considerably change the structure of economic knowledge. Formal modeling will be of minor importance and will give place to more applied fields of research.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>история экономической мысли</kwd><kwd>экономическая методология</kwd><kwd>теория сложности</kwd><kwd>мейнстрим</kwd><kwd>экономическая политика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>history of economic thought</kwd><kwd>economic methodology</kwd><kwd>complexity theory</kwd><kwd>mainstream economics</kwd><kwd>economic policy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Auyang S. Foundations of Complex-System Theories in Economics, Evolutionary Biology, and Statistical Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Auyang S. Foundations of Complex-System Theories in Economics, Evolutionary Biology, and Statistical Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Axtell R., Epstein J. Growing Artificial Societies from the Bottom Up. Cambridge, MA: MIT and Brookings, 1996; Axelrod R. The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Axtell R., Epstein J. Growing Artificial Societies from the Bottom Up. Cambridge, MA: MIT and Brookings, 1996; Axelrod R. The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Benjamin D., Laibson D. Good Policies for Bad Governments:Behavioral Political Economy/Boston Fed Conference on Behavioral Economics. June 2003. http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf48/papers/benjamin_laibson.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Benjamin D., Laibson D. Good Policies for Bad Governments:Behavioral Political Economy/Boston Fed Conference on Behavioral Economics. June 2003. http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf48/papers/benjamin_laibson.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brock W., Colander D. Complexity and Policy // The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brock W., Colander D. Complexity and Policy // The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. The Complexity Revolution and the Future of Economics // Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0319/Middlebury College, Department of Economics. 2003</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. The Complexity Revolution and the Future of Economics // Middlebury College Working Paper Series 0319/Middlebury College, Department of Economics. 2003</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. New Millennium Economics: How Did it Get This Way, and What Way is It? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1999. Vol. 14, No 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. New Millennium Economics: How Did it Get This Way, and What Way is It? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1999. Vol. 14, No 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. Muddling Through and Policy Analysis. Keynote Address at the New Zealand Economic Association. July 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. Muddling Through and Policy Analysis. Keynote Address at the New Zealand Economic Association. July 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. The Death of Neoclassical Economics // Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000. Vol. 22, No 2. P. 127-143.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. The Death of Neoclassical Economics // Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000. Vol. 22, No 2. P. 127-143.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. The sounds of silence: the profession's response to the COGEE report // American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1998. Vol. 80, No 3. Р. 600-607.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. The sounds of silence: the profession's response to the COGEE report // American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1998. Vol. 80, No 3. Р. 600-607.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. Why Aren't Economists as Important as Garbagemen? Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. Why Aren't Economists as Important as Garbagemen? Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D., Holt R., Rosser J. B. The Changing Face of Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D., Holt R., Rosser J. B. The Changing Face of Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Complexity and the History of Economic Thought / D. Colander (ed). N. Y.: Routledge. 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Complexity and the History of Economic Thought / D. Colander (ed). N. Y.: Routledge. 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Computational Finance / B. LeBaron, Y. Abu-Mostafa, A. Lo, A. Weigend (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Computational Finance / B. LeBaron, Y. Abu-Mostafa, A. Lo, A. Weigend (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooter R., Rappoport P. Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. 1984. Vol. 22, No 2. Р. 507-530.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooter R., Rappoport P. Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics // Journal of Economic Literature. 1984. Vol. 22, No 2. Р. 507-530.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Educating Economists / D. Colander, R. Brenner (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Educating Economists / D. Colander, R. Brenner (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Frank R. Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess. N. Y.: The Free Press, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frank R. Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess. N. Y.: The Free Press, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klamer A., Colander D. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klamer A., Colander D. The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1990.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schelling T. Foreword // Collective Choice: Essays in Honor of Mancur Olson/J. Heckelman, D. Coates (eds.). Berlin: Springer, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schelling T. Foreword // Collective Choice: Essays in Honor of Mancur Olson/J. Heckelman, D. Coates (eds.). Berlin: Springer, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solow R. How Did Economics Get That Way and What Way Is It? // Daedalus. 1997.Vol. 126, No 1. P. 39-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solow R. How Did Economics Get That Way and What Way Is It? // Daedalus. 1997.Vol. 126, No 1. P. 39-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C., Thaler R. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review [forthcoming] (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=405940).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C., Thaler R. Libertarian Paternalism Is Not An Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review [forthcoming] (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=405940).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics / D. Colander (ed). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics / D. Colander (ed). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Economy as an Evolving Complex System / P. Anderson, K. Arrow, D. Pines (eds.). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Economy as an Evolving Complex System / P. Anderson, K. Arrow, D. Pines (eds.). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II / W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, D. A. Lane (eds.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II / W. B. Arthur, S. N. Durlauf, D. A. Lane (eds.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tirole J. The Theory of Corporate Finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tirole J. The Theory of Corporate Finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waldrop M. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. N. Y.: Simon &amp; Schuster, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waldrop M. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. N. Y.: Simon &amp; Schuster, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weintraub R. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weintraub R. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
