<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2012-5-4-13</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-796</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИСКУССИЯ О СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ НАУКЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DEBATES ON MODERN ECONOMICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Карта — не территория: о состоянии экономической науки</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Map Is Not the Territory: An Essay on the State of Economics</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кэй</surname><given-names>Дж.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>приглашенный профессор</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Лондонская школа экономики</institution><country>Великобритания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>London School of Economics</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2012</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/796">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/796</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье утверждается, что современная экономическая наука находится в кризисном положении, поскольку важнейшие макроэкономические теории основаны на концепции рациональных ожиданий, а главным методом теоретического развития признается построение моделей, представляющих собой «искусственные миры». Предполагается, таким образом, что ожидания агентов так или иначе согласуются с теоретической моделью. Подобные построения зачастую основаны на априорных предпосылках и лишь после построения модели соотносятся с реальностью. Автор отстаивает иную концепцию науки, отличающуюся большим методологическим плюрализмом, в рамках которого построение дедуктивных моделей не является самоцелью и дополняется иными методами исследования, а от притязаний экономической науки на универсальность выводов предлагается отказаться.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article claims that modern economics is in the state of crisis, because the major macroeconomic theories are in fact based on the concept of rational expectations, and the main method of research is considered to be the model-building with models as "artificial worlds". Therefore it is supposed that the agents expectations are consistent with a theoretical model. Such constructs are often based on aprioristic assumptions and only after the model is built are they confronted with reality. The author defends an alternative view of science which is methodologically more pluralist and sees deductive model-building in need of being supplemented by other methods of inquiry suggesting that economic science abandons claims for universality of its conclusions.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>глобальный экономический кризис</kwd><kwd>макроэкономическая теория</kwd><kwd>рациональные ожидания</kwd><kwd>методология экономической науки</kwd><kwd>экономические модели</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>global economic crisis</kwd><kwd>macroeconomic theory</kwd><kwd>rational expectations</kwd><kwd>economic methodology</kwd><kwd>economic models</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Беккер Г. Экономический анализ и человеческое поведение // THESIS. 1993. Вып. 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Беккер Г. Экономический анализ и человеческое поведение // THESIS. 1993. Вып. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Левитт С., ДабнерС. Фрикономика. Мнение экономиста-диссидента о неожиданных связях между событиями и явлениями. М.: Вильямс, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Левитт С., ДабнерС. Фрикономика. Мнение экономиста-диссидента о неожиданных связях между событиями и явлениями. М.: Вильямс, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Талеб Н. Черный лебедь. Под знаком непредсказуемости. М.: КоЛибри, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Талеб Н. Черный лебедь. Под знаком непредсказуемости. М.: КоЛибри, 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Athreya K. Economics is Hard. Don't Let Bloggers Tell You Otherwise / Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 2010. http://www.scribd.com/doc/33655771/Economics-is-Hard.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Athreya K. Economics is Hard. Don't Let Bloggers Tell You Otherwise / Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 2010. http://www.scribd.com/doc/33655771/Economics-is-Hard.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Becker G. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1978.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Becker G. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1978.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cartwright N. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cartwright N. Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cochrane J. How Did Paul Krugman Get It So Wrong? http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/ john.cochrane/research/Papers/krugman_response.htm. 2009 Sep. 16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cochrane J. How Did Paul Krugman Get It So Wrong? http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/ john.cochrane/research/Papers/krugman_response.htm. 2009 Sep. 16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davidson D. Truth Rehabilitated // Brandom R. (еd.). Rorty and His Critics (Philosophers and their Critics). Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davidson D. Truth Rehabilitated // Brandom R. (еd.). Rorty and His Critics (Philosophers and their Critics). Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Friedman M., Savage L. The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk // Journal of Political Economy. 1948. Vol. 56, No 4. P. 279-304.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman M., Savage L. The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk // Journal of Political Economy. 1948. Vol. 56, No 4. P. 279-304.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Frydman R., Goldberg M. Imperfect Knowledge Economics: Exchange Rates and Risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Frydman R., Goldberg M. Imperfect Knowledge Economics: Exchange Rates and Risk. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. N. Y.: Back Bay Books, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. N. Y.: Back Bay Books, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Interview with Thomas Sargent. Sept. 2010. http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/ pub_display.cfm?id=4526.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Interview with Thomas Sargent. Sept. 2010. http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/ pub_display.cfm?id=4526.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kay J. The Map is Not the Territory: An Essay on the State of Economics / Institute for New Economic Thinking. 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kay J. The Map is Not the Territory: An Essay on the State of Economics / Institute for New Economic Thinking. 2011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Korzybski A. A Non-Aristotelian System and its Necessity for Rigour in Mathematics and Physics // Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Lakeville: International Non-Aristotelian Library, 1933.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korzybski A. A Non-Aristotelian System and its Necessity for Rigour in Mathematics and Physics // Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. Lakeville: International Non-Aristotelian Library, 1933.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levitt S., Dubner S. Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Exploresthe Hidden Side of Everything. N. Y.: William Morrow, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levitt S., Dubner S. Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Exploresthe Hidden Side of Everything. N. Y.: William Morrow, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis M. The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine. N. Y.: Norton, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis M. The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine. N. Y.: Norton, 2011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lucas R. In Defence of the Dismal Science // The Economist. 2009. Aug. 6. www. economist. com/node/14165405.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lucas R. In Defence of the Dismal Science // The Economist. 2009. Aug. 6. www. economist. com/node/14165405.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lucas R. Monetary Neutrality. Lecture to the Memory of Alfred Nobel. http://www.nobelprize.org/ nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1995/lucas-lecture.html</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lucas R. Monetary Neutrality. Lecture to the Memory of Alfred Nobel. http://www.nobelprize.org/ nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1995/lucas-lecture.html</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lucas R. On the Mechanics of Economic Development // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. Vol. 22, No 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lucas R. On the Mechanics of Economic Development // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1988. Vol. 22, No 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1976. Vol. 90, No 4. P. 630-649.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1976. Vol. 90, No 4. P. 630-649.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stiglitz J. Monopoly, Non-Linear Pricing, and Imperfect Information: The Insurance Market // Review of Economic Studies. 1977. Vol. 44, No 3. P. 407-430.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz J. Monopoly, Non-Linear Pricing, and Imperfect Information: The Insurance Market // Review of Economic Studies. 1977. Vol. 44, No 3. P. 407-430.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stiglitz J., Weiss A. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information // American Economic Review. 1981. Vol. 71, No 3. P. 393-410.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz J., Weiss A. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information // American Economic Review. 1981. Vol. 71, No 3. P. 393-410.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taleb N. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. 2nd Ed. N. Y.: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taleb N. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. 2nd Ed. N. Y.: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zuckerman G. The Greatest Trade Ever: The Behind-the-Scenes Story of How John Paulson Defied Wall Street and Made Financial History. N. Y.: Crown Business, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zuckerman G. The Greatest Trade Ever: The Behind-the-Scenes Story of How John Paulson Defied Wall Street and Made Financial History. N. Y.: Crown Business, 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
