<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2012-4-117-131</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-792</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТРАТЕГИЯ МОДЕРНИЗАЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>STRATEGY OF MODERNIZATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Модели развития, основанного на диффузии технологий</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Models of Development Based on Technology Diffusion</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Голиченко</surname><given-names>О.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Golichenko</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор экономических наук, главный научный сотрудник ЦЭМИ РАН, профессор МФТИ, НИУ ВШЭ</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Центральный экономико-математический институт РАН (ЦЭМИ РАН); Московский физико-технический институт; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Central Economic Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (CEMI); Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology; National Research University Higher School of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>04</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>131</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2012</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/792">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/792</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются вопросы организации потоков технологических знаний, направленных на многократное увеличение технологического потенциала развивающейся страны. Анализируется действие двух наиболее значимых для решения этой задачи каналов диффузии технологических знаний: открытого информационного и трансфера коммерческих знаний. Исследуются возможные модели технологического подхватывания. Показано, что две из них позволяют запустить такие движущие силы развития технологически отсталой экономики, как международную конкуренцию и эффективное использование глобальных технологических знаний.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The problems of multifold increase of technological potential of developing countries are considered in the article. To solve them, i.e. to organize effectively tapping into global knowledge and their absorption, the performance of two diffusion channels is considered: open knowledge transfer and commercial knowledge transfer. The models of technological catching-up are investigated. Two of them are found to give an opportunity of effective use of international competition and global technology knowledge as a driver of technology development.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>диффузия глобальных технологических знаний</kwd><kwd>модели развития</kwd><kwd>международная конкуренция</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>global technology diffusion</kwd><kwd>models of development</kwd><kwd>international competition</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">РГНФ, гранты № 11-02-00426а и 11-02-00656а.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Голиченко О. Г. Основные факторы развития национальной инновационной системы. M.: Наука, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Голиченко О. Г. Основные факторы развития национальной инновационной системы. M.: Наука, 2011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Голиченко О. Г. Проблемы модернизации инновационной системы и инновационной политики России // Инновации. 2008. № 10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Голиченко О. Г. Проблемы модернизации инновационной системы и инновационной политики России // Инновации. 2008. № 10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Голиченко О. Г. Современная технологическая революция и новые возможности инновационного развития «догоняющих» стран // Инновации. 2010. № 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Голиченко О. Г. Современная технологическая революция и новые возможности инновационного развития «догоняющих» стран // Инновации. 2010. № 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Голиченко О. Модернизация и реформирование инновационной стратегии России: проблемы и решения // Вопросы экономики. 2010. № 8. С. 41-53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Голиченко О. Модернизация и реформирование инновационной стратегии России: проблемы и решения // Вопросы экономики. 2010. № 8. С. 41-53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Минэкономразвития России. Стратегия инновационного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года / 10 февр. 2012. http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/ innovations/20120210_04.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Минэкономразвития России. Стратегия инновационного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2020 года / 10 февр. 2012. http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/ innovations/20120210_04.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полтерович В. М. Природа кризиса и стратегия модернизации: формирование системы интерактивного управления ростом // Стратегия модернизации российской экономики / Под ред. В. М. Полтеровича. СПб.: Алетейя, 2010. С. 35-85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Полтерович В. М. Природа кризиса и стратегия модернизации: формирование системы интерактивного управления ростом // Стратегия модернизации российской экономики / Под ред. В. М. Полтеровича. СПб.: Алетейя, 2010. С. 35-85.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aghion P., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P., Prantl S. The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2009. Vol. 91, No 1. P. 20-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aghion P., Blundell R., Griffith R., Howitt P., Prantl S. The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2009. Vol. 91, No 1. P. 20-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aghion P., Burgess R., Redding S., Zilibotti F. The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India // CEPR Discussion Paper. 2006. No 5492.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aghion P., Burgess R., Redding S., Zilibotti F. The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India // CEPR Discussion Paper. 2006. No 5492.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aghion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction // Econometrica. 1992. Vol. 60. P. 323-351.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aghion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction // Econometrica. 1992. Vol. 60. P. 323-351.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balassa B. Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage // The Manchester School. 1965. Vol. 33. P. 99-123.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balassa B. Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage // The Manchester School. 1965. Vol. 33. P. 99-123.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boone J. Measuring Product Market Competition // CEPR Discussion Paper. 2000. No 2636.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boone J. Measuring Product Market Competition // CEPR Discussion Paper. 2000. No 2636.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chandra V., Osorio-Rodarte I., Braga C. A. Primo. Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China): Catching-up Experiences // Innovation and Growth: Chasing a Moving Frontier. P. 25-64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chandra V., Osorio-Rodarte I., Braga C. A. Primo. Korea and the BICs (Brazil, India and China): Catching-up Experiences // Innovation and Growth: Chasing a Moving Frontier. P. 25-64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dixit A. K., Stiglitz J. E. Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity // American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67, No 3. P. 297-308.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dixit A. K., Stiglitz J. E. Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity // American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67, No 3. P. 297-308.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dutz M. (ed.). Unleashing India's Innovation: Towards Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dutz M. (ed.). Unleashing India's Innovation: Towards Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golub S. Measures of Restrictions on Inward Foreign Direct Investment for OECD Countries // OECD Economic Studies. 2003. No 36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golub S. Measures of Restrictions on Inward Foreign Direct Investment for OECD Countries // OECD Economic Studies. 2003. No 36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kochhar K., Kumar U., Rajan R., Subramanian A., Tokatlidis I. India's Pattern of Development: What Happened, What Follows? // Journal of Monetary Economics (Netherlands). 2006. Vol. 53, No 5. P. 981-1026.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kochhar K., Kumar U., Rajan R., Subramanian A., Tokatlidis I. India's Pattern of Development: What Happened, What Follows? // Journal of Monetary Economics (Netherlands). 2006. Vol. 53, No 5. P. 981-1026.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu X. L., Lundin N. Chinas Development Model: An Alternative Strategy for Technological Catch-up. Mimeo. 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu X. L., Lundin N. Chinas Development Model: An Alternative Strategy for Technological Catch-up. Mimeo. 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mathews J. China, India and Brazil: Tiger Technologies, Dragon Multinationals and the Building of National Systems of Economic Learning // Asian Business and Management. 2009. Vol. 8, No 1. P. 5-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mathews J. China, India and Brazil: Tiger Technologies, Dragon Multinationals and the Building of National Systems of Economic Learning // Asian Business and Management. 2009. Vol. 8, No 1. P. 5-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Naughton B. Growing out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform 1978-1993. Cambridge University Press, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Naughton B. Growing out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform 1978-1993. Cambridge University Press, 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Innovation and Growth: Chasing a Moving Frontier. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Innovation and Growth: Chasing a Moving Frontier. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Economic Surveys: India. 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Economic Surveys: India. 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Economic Surveys: Korea. 2007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Economic Surveys: Korea. 2007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Economic Surveys: Korea. 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Economic Surveys: Korea. 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Investment Policy Reviews: India. 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Investment Policy Reviews: India. 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Reviews of Innovation Policy: China. 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Reviews of Innovation Policy: China. 2008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Reviews of Innovation Policy: India. 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Reviews of Innovation Policy: India. 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Reviews of Innovation Policy: Korea. 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Reviews of Innovation Policy: Korea. 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD. Reviews of Regulatory Reform: China. 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD. Reviews of Regulatory Reform: China. 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rothman A. Reinventing China. In Search of an Innovative Economy / CLSA Report. 2006. Sept.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothman A. Reinventing China. In Search of an Innovative Economy / CLSA Report. 2006. Sept.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Topalova P. Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India // IMF Working Papers. 2004. No 04/28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Topalova P. Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India // IMF Working Papers. 2004. No 04/28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Utkulu U., Seymen D. Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-à-vis the EU/15. 2004. http://www.etsg.org/ ETSG2004/Papers/seymen.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Utkulu U., Seymen D. Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-à-vis the EU/15. 2004. http://www.etsg.org/ ETSG2004/Papers/seymen.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang J.-H. From Technological Catch-up to Innovation-based Economic Growth: South Korea and Taiwan Compared // Journal of Development Studies (UK). 2007. Vol. 43, No 6. P. 1084-1104.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang J.-H. From Technological Catch-up to Innovation-based Economic Growth: South Korea and Taiwan Compared // Journal of Development Studies (UK). 2007. Vol. 43, No 6. P. 1084-1104.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
