voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2015-3-46-60voprecotest-59Research ArticleИНВЕСТИЦИОННАЯ ПОЛИТИКАINVESTMENT POLICYОценка горизонтальных и вертикальных спилловер-эффектов от прямых иностранных инвестиций в РоссииAssessing horizontal and Vertical Spillover Effects from Foreign Direct Investment in RussiaФедороваЕ. А.FedorovaE.

д. э. н., проф. Финансового университета при Правительстве РФ (Москва), проф. НИУ ВШЭ (Москва)

ecolena@mail.ruБарихинаЮ. А.BarikhinaY.

магистр Финансового университета при Правительстве РФ

noemail@neicon.ruФинансовый университет при Правительстве РФ (Москва); НИУ ВШЭ (Москва)РоссияFinancial University under the Government of RF (Moscow, Russia); National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)Russian FederationФинансовый университет при Правительстве РФРоссияFinancial University under the Government of RF (Moscow, Russia)Russian Federation201520032015034660Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20152015Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/59

Считается, что иностранные инвестиции способствуют развитию национальной экономики, повышают эффективность отечественных компаний. На основе анализа балансов предприятий за 2004-2012 гг. с ПИИ и без них оценены горизонтальные и вертикальные спилловер-эффекты от притока иностранных инвестиций. С использованием эконометрического моделирования выявлено, что наиболее значимыми для российских компаний оказались обратные вертикальные спилловер-эффекты, то есть приток иностранного капитала больше всего влияет на эффективность работы отечественных поставщиков.

FDI is believed to be very helpful for the national economy’s development. It is expected to increase the profitability and productivity of domestic companies. The analysis of balance sheets of Russian enterprises shows that for the period2004-2012 foreign investment caused horizontal and vertical spillovers in economic sectors. But this impact is ambiguous. Econometric modeling establishes the significant positive role of backward spillover. This means that national suppliers gain benefits from international interaction and become more effective due to technological and knowledge inflow from abroad.

иностранные инвестицииспилловер-эффектгоризонтальный эффектвертикальный эффектмежотраслевой балансoreign investmentspillover effectsvertical effecthorizontal effectinput-output tablesReferencesAitken B., Harrison A., Lipsey R. (1996.) Wages and foreign ownership: A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 40, No. 3/4, pp. 345-371.Aitken B., Harrison A., Lipsey R. (1996.) Wages and foreign ownership: A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States. Journal of International Economics, Vol. 40, No. 3/4, pp. 345-371.Aitken B., Harrison A. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 605-618.Aitken B., Harrison A. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 605-618.Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Wang C. (2002). The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 637-655.Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Wang C. (2002). The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 637-655.Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Wang C. (2005). The relationship between inward foreign direct investment and the performance of domestically-owned Chinese manufacturing industry. Multinational Business Review, Vol. 12, No. 3. Special Issue, pp. 23-40.Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Wang C. (2005). The relationship between inward foreign direct investment and the performance of domestically-owned Chinese manufacturing industry. Multinational Business Review, Vol. 12, No. 3. Special Issue, pp. 23-40.Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Wang C. (2007a). Is the relationship between inward FDI and spillover effects linear? An empirical examination of the case of China. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 447-459.Buckley P. J., Clegg J., Wang C. (2007a). Is the relationship between inward FDI and spillover effects linear? An empirical examination of the case of China. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 447-459.Buckley P. J., Wang C., Clegg J. (2007b). The impact of foreign ownership, local ownership and industry characteristics on spillover benefits from foreign direct investment in China. International Business Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 142-158.Buckley P. J., Wang C., Clegg J. (2007b). The impact of foreign ownership, local ownership and industry characteristics on spillover benefits from foreign direct investment in China. International Business Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 142-158.Damijan J. P., Knell M., Majcen B., Rojec M. (2003). Technology transfer through FDI in top-10 transition countries: How important are direct effects, horizontal and vertical spillovers? WDI Working Paper, No. 54.Damijan J. P., Knell M., Majcen B., Rojec M. (2003). Technology transfer through FDI in top-10 transition countries: How important are direct effects, horizontal and vertical spillovers? WDI Working Paper, No. 54.Ethier W. (1986). The multinational firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 805-834.Ethier W. (1986). The multinational firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, No. 4, pp. 805-834.Griliches Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 94, Supplement, pp. 29-47.Griliches Z. (1992). The search for R&D spillovers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 94, Supplement, pp. 29-47.Harris R.I.D., Robinson C. (2004). Industrial policy and its effect on total factor productivity in UK manufacturing plants, 1990-1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 528-543.Harris R.I.D., Robinson C. (2004). Industrial policy and its effect on total factor productivity in UK manufacturing plants, 1990-1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 528-543.Javorcik B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 605-627.Javorcik B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 605-627.Javorcik B. S., Arnold J. (2005). Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3597.Javorcik B. S., Arnold J. (2005). Gifted kids or pushy parents? Foreign acquisitions and plant performance in Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 3597.Kosová R. (2004). Do foreign firms crowd out domestic firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Dissertation. University of Michigan Business School.Kosová R. (2004). Do foreign firms crowd out domestic firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Dissertation. University of Michigan Business School.Kugler M. (2006). Spillovers from foreign direct investment: Within or between industries? Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 444-477.Kugler M. (2006). Spillovers from foreign direct investment: Within or between industries? Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 444-477.Lall S. (1980). Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: An empirical study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 203-226.Lall S. (1980). Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: An empirical study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 203-226.Stančík J. (2007). Horizontal and vertical FDI spillovers: Recent evidence from the Czech Republic. CERGE-EI Working Paper, No. 340.Stančík J. (2007). Horizontal and vertical FDI spillovers: Recent evidence from the Czech Republic. CERGE-EI Working Paper, No. 340.Teece D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, No. 346, pp. 242-261.Teece D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Economic Journal, Vol. 87, No. 346, pp. 242-261.Wang C., Yu L., Zhong C. (2005). Heterogeneity of firms and spillovers: The case of foreign direct investment in Chinese industry. Journal of Asian Business, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 29-44.Wang C., Yu L., Zhong C. (2005). Heterogeneity of firms and spillovers: The case of foreign direct investment in Chinese industry. Journal of Asian Business, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 29-44.Wang C., Zhao Z. (2008). Horizontal and vertical spillover effects of foreign direct investment in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 8-20.Wang C., Zhao Z. (2008). Horizontal and vertical spillover effects of foreign direct investment in Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 8-20.Wei Y., Liu X. (2006). Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 544-557.Wei Y., Liu X. (2006). Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 544-557.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.