<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2013-9-66-90</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-572</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ISSUES OF THEORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Поведенческая экономика и «новый» патернализм. Часть I</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Behavioral Economics and New Paternalism. (Part I)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Капелюшников</surname><given-names>Р. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kapeliushnikov</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">rostis@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ИМЭМО РАН; НИУ ВШЭ (Москва)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia); Centre for Labour Market Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>09</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2013</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/572">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/572</self-uri><abstract><p>Работа посвящена критическому анализу нормативной программы поведенческой экономики, известной как «новый» патернализм. В первой части работы обсуждаются его теоретические предпосылки, описываются наиболее важные поведенческие аномалии, связанные с ограниченной рациональностью экономических агентов, анализируются нормативные установки и политические рекомендации сторонников этого подхода.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>поведенческая экономика</kwd><kwd>экономика благосостояния</kwd><kwd>новый патернализм</kwd><kwd>нормативный анализ</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>behavioral economics</kwd><kwd>welfare economics</kwd><kwd>new paternalism</kwd><kwd>normative analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белянин А. (2003). Дэниел Канеман и Вернон Смит: экономический анализ человеческого поведения (Нобелевская премия за чувство реальности) // Вопросы экономики. № 1. С. 4—23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Белянин А. (2003). Дэниел Канеман и Вернон Смит: экономический анализ человеческого поведения (Нобелевская премия за чувство реальности) // Вопросы экономики. № 1. С. 4—23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Либман А. М. (2013). Социальный либерализм, общественный интерес и поведенческая экономика // Общественные науки и современность. № 1. С. 27—38.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Либман А. М. (2013). Социальный либерализм, общественный интерес и поведенческая экономика // Общественные науки и современность. № 1. С. 27—38.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рубинштейн А. Я. (2013). Нормативный вектор в экономическом анализе. Второе открытие мериторики // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 1. С. 162—166.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Рубинштейн А. Я. (2013). Нормативный вектор в экономическом анализе. Второе открытие мериторики // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 1. С. 162—166.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хэндс У. (2012). Нормативная теория рационального выбора: прошлое, настоящее и будущее // Вопросы экономики. №. 10. С. 52—74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хэндс У. (2012). Нормативная теория рационального выбора: прошлое, настоящее и будущее // Вопросы экономики. №. 10. С. 52—74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Angner E., Loewenstein G. (2007). Behavioral Economics // Philosophy of Economics / U. Maki (ed.) // Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 13 / D. Gabbay, P. Thagard, J. Woods (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Angner E., Loewenstein G. (2007). Behavioral Economics // Philosophy of Economics / U. Maki (ed.) // Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 13 / D. Gabbay, P. Thagard, J. Woods (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ariely D. (2008). Predictably Irrational. Harper: HarperCollins Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ariely D. (2008). Predictably Irrational. Harper: HarperCollins Publishers.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arrow K. J. (1996). Preface // The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour / J. K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman (eds.). London: Macmillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arrow K. J. (1996). Preface // The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour / J. K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman (eds.). London: Macmillan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Basham P. (2010). Are Nudging and Shoving Good for Public Health? A Democracy Institute Report. Mimeo.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Basham P. (2010). Are Nudging and Shoving Good for Public Health? A Democracy Institute Report. Mimeo.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for “Asymmetric Paternalism” // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151, No 1. P. 1211—1254.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Camerer C., Issacharoff S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (2003). Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for “Asymmetric Paternalism” // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 151, No 1. P. 1211—1254.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choi J., Laibson D., Madrian B. C., Metrick A. (2002). Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Decisions, and the Path of Least Resistance // Tax Policy and the Economy / J. M. Poterba (ed.). Vol. 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. P. 67—113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choi J., Laibson D., Madrian B. C., Metrick A. (2002). Defined Contribution Pensions: Plan Rules, Participant Decisions, and the Path of Least Resistance // Tax Policy and the Economy / J. M. Poterba (ed.). Vol. 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. P. 67—113.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">CostaFont J. (2011). Behavioural Welfare Economics: Does ‘Behavioural Optimality’ Matter? // CESifo Economic Studies. Vol. 57, No 4. P. 551—559.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">CostaFont J. (2011). Behavioural Welfare Economics: Does ‘Behavioural Optimality’ Matter? // CESifo Economic Studies. Vol. 57, No 4. P. 551—559.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Della Vigna S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 315—372.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Della Vigna S. (2009). Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field // Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 315—372.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glaeser E. L. (2004). Psychology and the Market // American Economic Review. Vol. 94, No 2. P. 408—413.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glaeser E. L. (2004). Psychology and the Market // American Economic Review. Vol. 94, No 2. P. 408—413.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grunwald M. (2009). How Obama Is Using the Science of Change // Time Magazine. April 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grunwald M. (2009). How Obama Is Using the Science of Change // Time Magazine. April 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases // Science. Vol. 185, No 4157. P. 1124—1131.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases // Science. Vol. 185, No 4157. P. 1124—1131.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk // Econometrica. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 263—291.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk // Econometrica. Vol. 47, No 2. P. 263—291.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Katona G. (1951). Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katona G. (1951). Psychological Analysis of Economic Behavior. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klein D. B. (2004). Statist Quo Bias // Economic Journal Watch. Vol. 1, No 2. P. 260—271.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klein D. B. (2004). Statist Quo Bias // Economic Journal Watch. Vol. 1, No 2. P. 260—271.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knetsch J. L. (1989). The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves // American Economic Review. Vol. 79, No 5. P. 1277—1184.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knetsch J. L. (1989). The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves // American Economic Review. Vol. 79, No 5. P. 1277—1184.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laibson D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 112, No 2. P. 443—477.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laibson D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 112, No 2. P. 443—477.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lambert C. (2006). The Marketplace of Perceptions // Harvard Magazine. No 2. P. 50—95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lambert C. (2006). The Marketplace of Perceptions // Harvard Magazine. No 2. P. 50—95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leonard T. C. (2008). Review of “Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness” // Constitutional Political Economy. Vol. 19, No 4. P. 356—360.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leonard T. C. (2008). Review of “Richard H. Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness” // Constitutional Political Economy. Vol. 19, No 4. P. 356—360.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levine D. K. (2012). Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary. Open Book Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levine D. K. (2012). Is Behavioral Economics Doomed?: The Ordinary versus the Extraordinary. Open Book Publishers.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loewenstein G., Haisley E. (2006). The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of ‘Light’ Paternalism // The Handbook of Economic Methodologies. Vol. 1: Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations / A. Caplin, A. Schotter (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Loewenstein G., Haisley E. (2006). The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of ‘Light’ Paternalism // The Handbook of Economic Methodologies. Vol. 1: Perspectives on the Future of Economics: Positive and Normative Foundations / A. Caplin, A. Schotter (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mitchell G. (2005). Libertarian Paternalism Is an Oxymoron // Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 99, No 3. P. 1245—1277.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mitchell G. (2005). Libertarian Paternalism Is an Oxymoron // Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 99, No 3. P. 1245—1277.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paternalism (2009) // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/sum2009/entries/paternalism/#1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Paternalism (2009) // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford. edu/archives/sum2009/entries/paternalism/#1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Radnitzky G., Bernholtz P. (eds.) (1987). Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics. N. Y.: Paragon House Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Radnitzky G., Bernholtz P. (eds.) (1987). Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics. N. Y.: Paragon House Publishers.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rizzo M. J., Whitman D. G. (2009). The Knowledge Problem of the New Paternalism // Brigham Young University Law Review. No 4. P. 905—968.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rizzo M. J., Whitman D. G. (2009). The Knowledge Problem of the New Paternalism // Brigham Young University Law Review. No 4. P. 905—968.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">SaintPaul J. (2011). The Tyranny of Utility. Behavioral Social Science and the Role of Paternalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">SaintPaul J. (2011). The Tyranny of Utility. Behavioral Social Science and the Role of Paternalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sent E.M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics // History of Political Economy. Vol. 36, No 4, P. 735—760.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sent E.M. (2004). Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics // History of Political Economy. Vol. 36, No 4, P. 735—760.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simon H. A. (1987). Bounded Rationality // The New Palgrave / J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.). N. Y.: W.W. Norton.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simon H. A. (1987). Bounded Rationality // The New Palgrave / J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (eds.). N. Y.: W.W. Norton.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sugden R. (2008). Why Incoherent Preferences Do Not Justify Paternalism // Constitutional Political Economy. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 226—248.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sugden R. (2008). Why Incoherent Preferences Do Not Justify Paternalism // Constitutional Political Economy. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 226—248.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C., Thaler R. (2003a). Libertarian Paternalism // American Economic Review. Vol. 93, No 2. P. 175—179.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C., Thaler R. (2003a). Libertarian Paternalism // American Economic Review. Vol. 93, No 2. P. 175—179.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C., Thaler R. (2003b). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 70, No 4. P. 1159—1202.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C., Thaler R. (2003b). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron // University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 70, No 4. P. 1159—1202.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thaler R. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 1, No 1. P. 39—60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thaler R. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 1, No 1. P. 39—60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thaler R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice // Marketing Science. Vol. 4, No 1. P. 199—214.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thaler R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice // Marketing Science. Vol. 4, No 1. P. 199—214.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions // The Journal of Business. Vol. 59, No 4. Part 2. P. S251—S278.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions // The Journal of Business. Vol. 59, No 4. Part 2. P. S251—S278.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weale A. (1991). Paternalism // The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Though / D. Miller et al. (eds.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. P. 367—368.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weale A. (1991). Paternalism // The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Though / D. Miller et al. (eds.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. P. 367—368.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wintour P. (2010). David Cameron’s ‘Nudge Unit’ Aims to Improve Economic Behaviour // The Guardian. 9 September.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wintour P. (2010). David Cameron’s ‘Nudge Unit’ Aims to Improve Economic Behaviour // The Guardian. 9 September.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wright D. J., Ginsburg D. H. (2012). Behavioral Law and Economics: Its Origins, Its Fatal Flaws, and Its Implications for Liberty // Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 106, No 3. P. 1—106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wright D. J., Ginsburg D. H. (2012). Behavioral Law and Economics: Its Origins, Its Fatal Flaws, and Its Implications for Liberty // Northwestern University Law Review. Vol. 106, No 3. P. 1—106.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
