voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2024-1-94-114voprecotest-4635Research ArticleВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИISSUES OF THEORYМикрооснования доминирования фундаментализма в экономической политике: есть ли антидот?Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9416-4086ПавловаН. С.PavlovaN. S.

Павлова Наталья Сергеевна, к. э. н., доцент кафедры конкурентной и промышленной политики экономического факультета, с. н. с. Центра исследований конкуренции и экономического регулирования

Москва

Moscow

pavl.ns@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-069XШаститкоА. Е.ShastitkoA. E.

Шаститко Андрей Евгеньевич, д. э. н., проф., завкафедрой конкурентной и промышленной политики экономического факультета, директор Центра исследований конкуренции и экономического регулирования

Москва

Moscow

saedd@mail.ruМосковский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова; Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФРоссияLomonosov Moscow State University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationRussian Federation2024070120240194114Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20242024Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/4635

Исследуются причины доминирования фундаментализма (в форме пигувианства или рыночного фундаментализма) над функционализмом (коузианством) в практике выработки решений в экономической политике, в частности, в области когнитивных искажений и поведенческих эффектов. Показано, как принятие решений с использованием автоматической когнитивной системы может приводить к выбору фундаменталистского варианта решения проблемы, даже если он не наиболее оптимальный, а также снижает эффективность функционализма, поскольку препятствует корректной идентификации самой проблемы, структурных альтернатив ее решения, выявлению и сопоставлению связанных с каждой из альтернатив эффектов. Исследуются микрооснования недостаточного спроса и предложения коузианского подхода. Исходя из идентифицированных проблем спроса и предложения на коузианство, в качестве одного из способов его продвижения предлагается рассмотреть первичную социализацию индивида в процессе обучения, формирования предметно критического мышления. Подчеркивается, что корректировка процесса социализации относится к долгосрочной стратегии

The article examines the possible reasons for the dominance of fundamentalism( in the form of Pigouvianism or market fundamentalism) over functionalism (Coasianism) in the practice of decision-making in economic policy. Continuing the study of the relationship between Coasianism, Pigouvianism and market fundamentalism, presented in previous works, the article focuses on finding the basis for the dominance of fundamentalism at the level of individual decisions and actions — in particular, in the field of cognitive bias and behavioral effects. Decision-making using an automatic cognitive system, subject to cognitive bias, as opposed to a reflective system, can lead to the choice of a fundamentalist solution to a problem where it is not the most efficient, and also reduces the efficiency of functionalism, since it prevents the correct identification of the problem itself, of the structural alternatives for its solution, as well as identifying and comparing the effects associatedwith each of the alternatives. The microfoundations of insufficient supply and demand of the Coasian approach are explored. Based on the identified problems of supply and demand for Coasianism, as one of the possible ways to promote it, it is proposed to consider the primary socialization of the individual in the learning process, the formation of substantive critical thinking. It is emphasized that adjustments to the socialization process are a matter of long-term strategy

когнитивные искажениякоузианствопигувианствоповеденческая экономикарыночный фундаментализмэкономическая политикаcognitive biasCoasian approachPigouvian approachbehavioraleconomicsmarket fundamentalismeconomic policyСтатья подготовлена в рамках выполнения научно-исследовательской работы государственного задания РАНХиГС.ReferencesАвтономов В. С. (1993). Человек в зеркале экономической теории (Очерк истории западной экономической мысли). М.: Наука. [Avtonomov V. S. (1993). A man in the mirror of economic theory (Essay on the history of western economic thought). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).]Avtonomov V. S. (1993). Man in the mirror of economic theory. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).Автономов В. С. (1998). Модель человека в экономической науке. СПб.: Экономическая школа. [Avtonomov V. S. (1998). The model of man in economic science. St. Petersburg: Economic School. (In Russian).]Avtonomov V. S. (1998). The model of man in economic science. St. Petersburg: Economic School. (In Russian).Аузан А. А., Мальцев А. А., Курдин А. А. (2023). Российское экономическое образование: образ ближайшего будущего // Вопросы экономики. № 10. С. 5—26. [Auzan A. A., Maltsev A. A., Kurdin A. A. (2023). Russian economic education: Image of the near future. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. 5—26. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-10-5-26.Auzan A. A., Maltsev A. A., Kurdin A. A. (2023). Russian economic education: image of the near future. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, pp. … (In Russian). https://doi.org/Гиринский А. А., Лепетюхина А. О., Пащенко Т. В. (2023). Концепция критического мышления: генезис понятия и актуальные проблемы применения в образовании // Мир психологии. № 3. С. 286—300. [Girinskiy A. A., Lepetiukhina A. O., Pashchenko T. V. (2023). The concept of critical thinking: The genesis of the concept and current problems of application in education. World of Рsychology, No. 3, pp. 286—300. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.51944/20738528_2023_3_286Siebert H. (2005). Cobra effect: how to avoid wrong paths in policy. Moscow: Novoye Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).Зиберт Х. (2005). Эффект кобры: как избежать заблуждений в политике / Пер. с нем. М.: Новое издательство. [Siebert H. (2005). Cobra effect: How to avoid wrong paths in policy. Moscow: Novoye Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).]Siegfried J. (ed.) (2011). Better living through economics. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).Зигфрид Дж. (ред.) (2011). Как экономическая наука помогает делать нашу жизнь лучше. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара. [Siegfried J. (ed.) (2011). Better living through economics. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).]Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2018). On current state of economics: subjective semi-sociological observations. (Working paper WP3/2018/03). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (In Russian).Капелюшников Р. И. (2018). О современном состоянии экономической науки: полусоциологические наблюдения (Препринт WP3/2018/03). М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ. [Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2018). On current state of economics: Subjective semi-sociological observations. (Working paper WP3/2018/03). Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).]Kobrinskiy N. E., Mayminas E. Z., Smirnov A. D. (1982). Economic cybernetics. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).Кобринский Н. Е., Майминас Е. З., Смирнов А. Д. (1982). Экономическая кибернетика. М.: Экономика. [Kobrinskiy N. E., Mayminas E. Z., Smirnov A. D. (1982). Economic cybernetics. Moscow: Ekonomika. (In Russian).]Coase R. (1993). The firm, the market, and the law. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).Корешникова Ю. Н., Фрумин И. Д., Пащенко Т. В. (2021). Организационные и педагогические условия формирования навыка критического мышления у студентов российских вузов // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. Т. 25, № 1. С. 5—17. [Koreshnikova Y. N., Froumin I. D., Pashchenko T. V. (2021). Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of critical thinking skills among Russian university students. University Management: Practice and Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 5—17. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.01.001Leijonhufvud A. (1993). Life Among the Econ. THESIS, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 277-287. (In Russian).Коуз Р. (1993). Фирма, рынок и право. М.: Дело. [Coase R. (1993). The firm, the market, and the law. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).]Maltsev A. A. (2023). Peter the Great and interdisciplinary synthesis. Moscow University Economics Bulletin, No. 2, pp. 3-19. (In Russian.) https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-1Лейонхуфвуд А. (1993). Жизнь среди эконов // THESIS. Т. 1, № 3. С. 277—287. [Leijonhufvud A. (1993). Life among the econ. THESIS, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 277—287. (In Russian).]Pavlova N. S. (2017). Behavioral aspects of regulator decisions. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7—18. (In Russian).Мальцев А. А. (2023). Петр I и междисциплинарный синтез // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6. Экономика. № 2. С. 3—19. [Maltsev A. A. (2023). Peter the Great and interdisciplinary synthesis. Moscow University Economic Bulletin, No. 2, pp. 3—19. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-2-1Tirole J. (2020). Economics for the common good. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).Павлова Н. С. (2017). Поведенческие аспекты действий регулятора // Научные исследования экономического факультета: Электронный журнал. Т. 9, № 1. С. 7—18. [Pavlova N. S. (2017). Behavioral aspects of regulator decisions. Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics: Electronic Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 7—18. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2017-9-1-7-18Tutov L. A., Shastitko A. E. (2017). The experience of the subject identification of New institutional economics. Voprosy Filosofii, No. 6, pp. 63-73. (In Russian).Тироль Ж. (2020). Экономика для общего блага. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара. [Tirole J. (2020). Economics for the common good. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).]Metalanguage within disciplinary discourse for scientific research programs: Invitation to a debate. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 96—115. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-96-115Тутов Л. А., Шаститко А. Е. (2017). Опыт предметной идентификации новой институциональной экономической теории // Вопросы философии. № 6. С. 63—73. [Tutov L. A., Shastitko A. E. (2017). The experience of the subject identification of New Institutional Economics. Voprosy Filosofii, No. 6, pp. 63—73. (In Russian).]Furubotn E., Richter R. (2005). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. St. Petersburg: St Petersburg University Publ. (In Russian).Тутов Л. А., Шаститко А. Е. (2021). Метаязык внутридисциплинарного дискурса для научно-исследовательских программ: приглашение к разговору // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 96—115. [Tutov L. A., Shastitko A. E. (2021). Metalanguage within disciplinary discourse for scientific research programs: Invitation to a debate. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 96—115. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-96-115Shastitko A. E. (2010). New institutional economics. 4th ed. Moscow: Teis. (In Russian).Фуруботн Э., Рихтер Р. (2005). Институты и экономическая теория. Достижения новой институциональной экономической теории. СПб.: Изд. дом Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета. [Furubotn E., Richter R. (2005). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the New institutional economics. St. Petersburg: St Petersburg University Publ. (In Russian).]Shastitko A. E. (2021). Pigouvianism vs. Coasianism: Who wins? Economics of Contemporary Russia, No. 3, pp. 49—57. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-3(94)-49-57Шаститко А. Е. (2010). Новая институциональная экономическая теория. 4-е изд. М.: Теис. [Shastitko A. E. (2010). New institutional economics. 4th ed. Moscow: Teis. (In Russian).]Shastitko A. E., Golovanova S. V. (2014). Competition issues regarding procurement of capital-intencive goods for a large buyer (lessons learned from one antitrust case). Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 1, pp. 67—89. (In Russian).Шаститко А. Е. (2021). Пигувианство против коузианства: кто кого? // Экономическая наука современной России. № 3. C. 49—57. [Shastitko A. E. (2021). Pigouvianism vs. Coasianism: Who wins? Economics of Contemporary Russia, No. 3, pp. 49—57. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-3(94)-49-57Shastitko A. E., Ionkina К. A. (2023). Institutional response after technological changes in telecommunications. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 50-67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-50-67Шаститко А. Е., Голованова С. В. (2014). Вопросы конкуренции в закупках капиталоемкой продукции крупным потребителем (уроки одного антимонопольного дела) // Экономическая политика. № 1. С. 67—89. [Shastitko A. E., Golovanova S. V. (2014). Competition issues regarding procurement of capital-intencive goods for a large buyer (lessons learned from one antitrust case). Ekonomicheskaya Politika, No. 1, pp. 67—89. (In Russian).]Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S. (2023). Pigouvian vs. Coasian approach: ideas, values, perspectives. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 23-46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-1-23-46Шаститко А. Е., Ионкина К. А. (2023). Институциональный ответ на технологические изменения в сфере телекоммуникаций // Вопросы экономики. № 5. С. 50—67. [Shastitko A. E., Ionkina К. A. (2023). Institutional response after technological changes in telecommunications. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 50—67. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-5-50-67Shastitko A. E., Shabalov I. P., Filippova I. N. (2018). Russian production of large-diameter pipes organization: the context, results, and prospects. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 435-464. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2018.306Шаститко А. Е., Павлова Н. С. (2022). Коузианство против пигувианства: идеи, ценности, перспективы // Вопросы экономики. № 1. С. 23—46. [Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S. (2022). Pigouvian vs. Coasian approach: Ideas, values, perspectives. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 23—46. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-1-23-46Shastitko A. E., Shabalov I. P., Filippova I. N. (2019). Informal institutions in contracting under conditions of fundamental changes (evidence from the large-diameter pipe industry). St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 484–512. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.401Шаститко А. Е., Шабалов И. П., Филиппова И. Н. (2018). Организация российского производства труб большого диаметра: контекст, результаты, перспективы // Российский журнал менеджмента. Т. 16, № 3. С. 435—464. [Shastitko A. E., Shabalov I. P., Filippova I. N. (2018). Russian production of large-diameter pipes organization: Тhe context, results, and prospects. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 435—464. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2018.306Eggertsson T. (2001). Economic behavior and institutions. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).Шаститко А. Е., Шабалов И. П., Филиппова И. Н. (2019). Неформальные институты контрактации на товарных рынках в условиях сжатия спроса (на примере отрасли по производству труб большого диаметра) // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия 5. Экономика. Т. 35, № 4. С. 484—512. [Shastitko A. E., Shabalov I. P., Filippova I. N. (2019). Informal institutions in contracting underconditions of fundamental changes (Evidence from the large-diameter pipe industry). St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 484—512. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.401Bugental D. B., Grusec J. E. (2006). Socialization processes. In: N. Eisenberg (ed.). Handbook of Child Psychology, 6th ed., Vol. 3: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development. New York: Wiley, pp. 366–428.Эггертссон Т. (2001). Экономическое поведение и институты. М.: Дело. [Eggertsson T. (2001). Economic behavior and institutions. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).]Cooper J. (2003). Behavioral economics and biased regulators. Mercatus on Policy Series working paper, George Mason University.Braman E. (2009). Law, politics, and perception: How policy preferences influence legal reasoning. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Cooper J., Kovacic W. (2012). Behavioral economics: implications for regulatory behavior. Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9180-1Bugental D. B., Grusec J. E. (2006). Socialization processes. In: N. Eisenberg (ed.). Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. New York: Wiley, pp. 366—428.Downs A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Cooper J. (2013). Behavioral economics and biased regulators. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University.Friedman J. (2005). Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance. Critical Review, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, pp. 1-58, https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810508443623Cooper J., Kovacic W. (2012). Behavioral economics: Implications for regulatory behavior. Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 41—58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9180-1Gerber A., Hoffman M., Morgan J., Raymond C. (2020). One in a million: field experiments on perceived closeness of the election and voter turnout. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 287-325. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180574Downs A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Heiner R. (1983). The origins of predictable behavior. American Economic Review, Vol. 73, pp. 560-595.Friedman J. (2005). Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance. Critical Review, Vol. 17, No. 1—2, pp. 1—58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810508443623Jones, P.E., Roelofsma P.H.M.P. (2000). The Potential for Social Contextual and Group Biases in Team Decision-Making: Biases, Conditions and Psychological Mechanisms. Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1129–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084914Gerber A., Hoffman M., Morgan J., Raymond C. (2020). One in a million: Field experiments on perceived closeness of the election and voter turnout. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 287—325. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180574Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Heiner R. (1983). The origins of predictable behavior. American Economic Review, Vol. 73, pp. 560—595.Kahneman D., Krueger A., Schkade D., Schwarz N., Stone A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, Vol. 312, No. 5782, pp. 1908–1910.Jones P. E., Roelofsma P. H. M. P. (2000). The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: Biases, conditions and psychologicalmechanisms. Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 1129—1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130050084914Katsoulacos Y. (2022). Why legal standards in antitrust enforcement in developing jurisdictions should differ from those in mature jurisdictions: A decision-theoretic approach. BRICS Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1-19.Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Kwak J. (2013). Cultural capture and the financial crisis. In: D. Carpenter, D. A. Moss (eds). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71–98.Kahneman D., Krueger A., Schkade D., Schwarz N., Stone A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science, Vol. 312, No. 5782, pp. 1908—1910. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129688Kunda Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, pp. 480–498.Katsoulacos Y. (2022). Why legal standards in antitrust enforcement in developing jurisdictions should differ from those in mature jurisdictions: A decision-theoretic approach. BRICS Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1—19. https://doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.3.e81036Lucas G., Tasić S. (2015). Behavioral Public Choice and the Law. West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 118, pp. 199-266.Kwak J. (2013). Cultural capture and the financial crisis. In: D. Carpenter, D. A. Moss (eds). Preventing regulatory capture: Special interest influence and how to limit it. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 71—98. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565875.008Menard C., Shabalov I., Shastitko A. (2021). Institutions to the rescue: Untangling industrial fragmentation, institutional misalignment, and political constraints in the Russian gas pipeline industry. Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 80, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102223Kunda Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 480—498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480North D. C. (1993). What do we mean by rationality. Public Choice, Vol. 77, pp. 159–162.Lucas G., Tasić S. (2015). Behavioral public choice and the law. West Virginia Law Review, Vol. 118, pp. 199—266.OECD (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/7a9638cb-en.Menard C., Shabalov I., Shastitko A. (2021). Institutions to the rescue: Untangling industrial fragmentation, institutional misalignment, and political constraints in the Russian gas pipeline industry. Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 80, pp. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102223Patt A., Zeckhauser R. (2000). Action bias and environmental decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 21, pp. 45–72.North D. C. (1993). What do we mean by rationality. Public Choice, Vol. 77, pp. 159—162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049229Persson E., Tinghög G. (2020). Opportunity cost neglect in public policy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 170, pp. 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.012OECD (2020). Regulatory impact assessment. OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7a9638cb-enSchmalensee R. (2012). “On a level with dentists?” Reflections on the evolution of industrial organization. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp.157-179.Patt A., Zeckhauser R. (2000). Action bias and environmental decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 21, pp. 45—72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026517309871Shastitko A., Golovanova S., Avdasheva S. (2014) Investigation of collusion in procurement of one Russian large buyer. World Competition, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 235-247.Persson E., Tinghög G. (2020). Opportunity cost neglect in public policy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 170, pp. 301—312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.012Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters, E., MacGregor D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D., Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420.Schmalensee R. (2012). “On a level with dentists?” Reflections on the evolution of industrialorganization. Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 157—179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9356-6Tasic S. (2011). Are Regulators Rational? Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 17, No.1, Article 3.Shastitko A., Golovanova S., Avdasheva S. (2014). Investigation of collusion in procurement of one Russian large buyer. World Competition, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 235—247. https://doi.org/10.54648/WOCO2014020Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London, Penguin Books.Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., MacGregor D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In: Т. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (eds.). Heuristics and biases: The psychologyof intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397—420. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.025Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., MacGregor D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In: Т. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (eds.). Heuristics and biases: The psychologyof intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397—420. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.025Tasic S. (2011). Are regulators rational? Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 17, No. 1, article 3. https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1248Tasic S. (2011). Are regulators rational? Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, Vol. 17, No. 1, article 3. https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1248Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin BooksThaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin Books

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.