voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2023-11-5-27voprecotest-4478Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА ОТРАСЛЕВЫХ РЫНКОВINDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONСовокупная факторная производительность российских компаний: оценки, тренды и факторы динамикиTotal factor productivity of Russian companies: Assessments, trends, and dynamic factorshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4285-9115АбрамовА. Е.AbramovA. E.

Абрамов Александр Евгеньевич, к. э. н., завлабораторией анализа институтов и финансовых рынков Института прикладных экономических исследований (ИПЭИ) 

Москва

Moscow

abramov-ae@ranepa.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2459-5614ДжаохадзеЕ. Д.DzhaokhadzeE. D.

Джаохадзе Елена Джурховна, м. н. с. лаборатории анализа институтов и финансовых рынков ИПЭИ 

Москва

Moscow

dzhaokhadze-ed@ranepa.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2242-9994РадыгинА. Д.RadyginA. D.

Радыгин Александр Дмитриевич, д. э. н., проф., директор ИПЭИ, член совета директоров Института Гайдара

Moscow

arad@ranepa.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0144-1820ЧерноваМ. И.ChernovaM. I.

Чернова Мария Игоревна, к. э. н., с. н. с. лаборатории анализа институтов и финансовых рынков

Moscow

chernova-mi@ranepa.ruРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской ФедерацииРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationRussian FederationРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; Институт экономической политики имени Е. Т. ГайдараРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Gaidar Institute for Economic PolicyRussian Federation202308112023011527Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20232023Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/4478

В статье анализируется совокупная факторная производительность (СФП) российских компаний в 2012–2020 гг. в восьми отраслях: сельском хозяйстве, добыче, обработке, энергетике, водоснабжении, торговле, транспортировке, информации и связи. За рассматриваемый период времени наблюдалась тенденция снижения средневзвешенной СФП российских компаний накопленным итогом. При этом в сельском хозяйстве, добыче, торговле, информации и связи, где рост инвестиций сопровождался усилением внутриотраслевой конкуренции, СФП росла, а в отраслях, где указанного сочетания динамики инвестиций и конкуренции не наблюдалось, СФП снижалась. Почти во всех отраслях, за исключением информации и связи, СФП частных компаний не была выше, чем в компаниях с государственным участием (КГУ) с прямым государственным владением. Более того, в добывающей отрасли указанные КГУ имели более высокую СФП, чем частные организации. Однако на уровне средних и малых компаний СФП частных компаний оказалась более высокой во всех отраслях, за исключением сельского хозяйства и добычи, где устойчивых различий в СФП частных компаний и КГУ не наблюдалось. Также выявлено, что СФП частных компаний и КГУ с прямым государственным владением уступала производительности КГУ с косвенным государственным владением за исключением добычи, где указанные различия были незначимы.

The article presents the results of the analysis of total factor productivity( TFP) of Russian companies across eight industries — agriculture, extraction, processing, energy, water supply, trade, transportation, and information and communication — during the period of 2012 to 2020. Over this timeframe, there was an observable trend of decreasing TFP among Russian companies cumulatively. Sector-specific analysis reveals an upward TFP trend in agriculture, extraction, and trade sectors, while in information and communication, the metric remained virtually unchanged. Almost across all sectors, except for information and communication, private companies exhibited lower TFP compared to stateowned enterprises (SOEs) with direct government ownership. Furthermore, in the extraction sector, SOEs demonstrated higher TFP than private organizations. However, the TFP of medium and small private companies proved to be higher across all sectors, excluding agriculture and extraction. Additionally, it was found that both private companies and SOEs with direct government ownership lagged behind the productivity of SOEs with indirect government ownership, except for the extraction sector, where these distinctions were negligible

совокупная факторная производительностьгосударственная собственностьотраслевые различиячастные компаниикомпании с государственным участиемКГУКГУ с прямым государственным владениемКГУ с косвенным государственным владениемtotal factor productivitystate ownershipsectoral disparitiesprivate companiesstate-owned enterprisesSOEs with direct state ownershipSOEs with indirect state ownershipReferencesАбрамов А. Е., Радыгин А. Д., Чернова М. И., Энтов Р. М. (2017). Государственная собственность и характеристики эффективности // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 5–37. [Abramov A. E., Radygin A. D., Chernova M. I., Entov R. M. (2017). State ownership and performance characteristics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 5–37. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-4-5-37Абрамов А. Е., Радыгин А. Д., Чернова М. И., Энтов Р. М. (2017). Государственная собственность и характеристики эффективности // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 5–37. [Abramov A. E., Radygin A. D., Chernova M. I., Entov R. M. (2017). State ownership and performance characteristics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 5–37. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-4-5-37Бессонов В. А. (2004). О динамике совокупной факторной производительности в российской переходной экономике // Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики. № 4. С. 542–587. [Bessonov V. A. (2004). On the dynamics of aggregate factor productivity in the Russian transition economy. Economicheski jurnal Vishei shkoli economiki, No. 4, pp. 542–587. (In Russian).].Бессонов В. А. (2004). О динамике совокупной факторной производительности в российской переходной экономике // Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики. № 4. С. 542–587. [Bessonov V. A. (2004). On the dynamics of aggregate factor productivity in the Russian transition economy. Economicheski jurnal Vishei shkoli economiki, No. 4, pp. 542–587. (In Russian).].Бессонова Е., Гончар К. (2022). Могут ли рост конкуренции и жесткие бюджетные ограничения снизить потери эффективности государственных предприятий? // Деньги и кредит. № 3. С. 22–53. [Bessonova E., Gonchar K. (2022). Can increased competition and tight budget constraints reduce the efficiency losses of state-owned enterprises? Dengi i kredit, No. 3, pp. 22–53. (In Russian).]Бессонова Е., Гончар К. (2022). Могут ли рост конкуренции и жесткие бюджетные ограничения снизить потери эффективности государственных предприятий? // Деньги и кредит. № 3. С. 22–53. [Bessonova E., Gonchar K. (2022). Can increased competition and tight budget constraints reduce the efficiency losses of state-owned enterprises? Dengi i kredit, No. 3, pp. 22–53. (In Russian).]Бессонова Е. (2018) Анализ динамики совокупной производительности факторов на российских предприятиях (2009–2015 гг.) // Вопросы экономики. № 7. С. 96–118. [Bessonova E. (2018). Analysis of Russian firms’ TFP growth in 2009–2015. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 96–118. (In Russian)] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-96-118Бессонова Е. (2018) Анализ динамики совокупной производительности факторов на российских предприятиях (2009–2015 гг.) // Вопросы экономики. № 7. С. 96–118. [Bessonova E. (2018). Analysis of Russian firms’ TFP growth in 2009–2015. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 96–118. (In Russian)] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-96-118Бессонова Е. (2007) Оценка эффективности производства российских промышленных предприятий // Прикладная эконометрика. №. 2. С. 13–35. [Bessonova E. (2007). Evaluation of the production efficiency of Russian industrial enterprises. Prikladnai econometrika, No. 2, pp. 13-35. (In Russian).]Бессонова Е. (2007) Оценка эффективности производства российских промышленных предприятий // Прикладная эконометрика. №. 2. С. 13–35. [Bessonova E. (2007). Evaluation of the production efficiency of Russian industrial enterprises. Prikladnai econometrika, No. 2, pp. 13-35. (In Russian).]Воскобойников И. Б., Баранов Э. Ф., Бобылева К. В., Капелюшников Р. И., Пионтковский Д. И., Толоконников А. В., Роскин А. А. (2020). Источники роста производительности труда после шоков 1998 и 2008 годов в России в контексте перспектив восстановления экономики после кризиса COVID-19. М.: Издательский дом ВШЭ. [Voskoboinikov I. B., Baranov E. F., Bobileva K. V., Kapelushnikov R. I., Piontkovskii D. I., Roskin A. A. (2020). Sources of labor productivity growth after the shocks of 1998 and 2008 in Russia in the context of prospects for economic recovery after the COVID-19 crisis. Moscow, Izdatelskii dom VSHE. (In Russian).]Воскобойников И. Б., Баранов Э. Ф., Бобылева К. В., Капелюшников Р. И., Пионтковский Д. И., Толоконников А. В., Роскин А. А. (2020). Источники роста производительности труда после шоков 1998 и 2008 годов в России в контексте перспектив восстановления экономики после кризиса COVID-19. М.: Издательский дом ВШЭ. [Voskoboinikov I. B., Baranov E. F., Bobileva K. V., Kapelushnikov R. I., Piontkovskii D. I., Roskin A. A. (2020). Sources of labor productivity growth after the shocks of 1998 and 2008 in Russia in the context of prospects for economic recovery after the COVID-19 crisis. Moscow, Izdatelskii dom VSHE. (In Russian).]Ayyagari M., Demirgüç-Kunt A., Maksimovic V. (2011). Firm innovation in emerging markets: The role of finance, governance, and competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1545-1580.Ayyagari M., Demirgüç-Kunt A., Maksimovic V. (2011). Firm innovation in emerging markets: The role of finance, governance, and competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 1545-1580.Bagdadioglu N., Price C.M.W., Weyman-Jones T.G. (1996). Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: a non-parametric model of the Turkish experience. Energy economics, Vol. 18, No. 1-2, pp. 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938396Bagdadioglu N., Price C.M.W., Weyman-Jones T.G. (1996). Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: a non-parametric model of the Turkish experience. Energy economics, Vol. 18, No. 1-2, pp. 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938396Bah E.H., Fang L. (2015). Impact of the business environment on output and productivity in Africa. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 114, pp. 159-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884563Bah E.H., Fang L. (2015). Impact of the business environment on output and productivity in Africa. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 114, pp. 159-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884563Bartelsman E., Haltiwanger J., Scarpetta S. (2013). Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American economic review, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 305-34.Bartelsman E., Haltiwanger J., Scarpetta S. (2013). Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American economic review, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 305-34.Bogart D., Chaudhary L. (2015). Off the rails: Is state ownership bad for productivity? Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 997-1013.Bogart D., Chaudhary L. (2015). Off the rails: Is state ownership bad for productivity? Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 997-1013.Bogetic Z., Olusi. O. (2013) Drivers of firm-level productivity in Russia's manufacturing sector. World Bank policy research working paper, No. 6572.Bogetic Z., Olusi. O. (2013) Drivers of firm-level productivity in Russia's manufacturing sector. World Bank policy research working paper, No. 6572.Borghi E., Del Bo C., Florio M. (2016). Institutions and firms' productivity: evidence from electricity distribution in the EU. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 170-196.Borghi E., Del Bo C., Florio M. (2016). Institutions and firms' productivity: evidence from electricity distribution in the EU. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 170-196.Bournakis I., Mallick S. (2018). TFP estimation at firm level: The fiscal aspect of productivity convergence in the UK. Economic Modelling, Vol. 70, pp. 579-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.021Bournakis I., Mallick S. (2018). TFP estimation at firm level: The fiscal aspect of productivity convergence in the UK. Economic Modelling, Vol. 70, pp. 579-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.021Brouwer P., De Kok J., Fris P. (2005). Can firm age account for productivity differences? EIM SCALES- paper N200421, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.Brouwer P., De Kok J., Fris P. (2005). Can firm age account for productivity differences? EIM SCALES- paper N200421, Zoetermeer, Netherlands.Brown J.D., Earle J.S., Telegdy A. (2006). The productivity effects of privatization: Longitudinal estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine. Journal of political economy, Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 61-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499547Brown J.D., Earle J.S., Telegdy A. (2006). The productivity effects of privatization: Longitudinal estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine. Journal of political economy, Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 61-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499547Castelnovo P., Del Bo C.F., Florio M. (2019). Quality of institutions and productivity of State-Invested Enterprises: International evidence from major telecom companies. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 58, pp. 102-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.10.005Castelnovo P., Del Bo C.F., Florio M. (2019). Quality of institutions and productivity of State-Invested Enterprises: International evidence from major telecom companies. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 58, pp. 102-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.10.005Cullmann A., von Hirschhausen C. (2008). Efficiency analysis of East European electricity distribution in transition: legacy of the past? Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0075-1Cullmann A., von Hirschhausen C. (2008). Efficiency analysis of East European electricity distribution in transition: legacy of the past? Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-007-0075-1Dhawan R. (2001). Firm size and productivity differential: theory and evidence from a panel of US firms. Journal of economic behavior & organization, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 269-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00139-6Dhawan R. (2001). Firm size and productivity differential: theory and evidence from a panel of US firms. Journal of economic behavior & organization, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 269-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00139-6Di Bella G., Dynnikova O., Slavov M.S.T. (2019). The Russian State’s Size and its Footprint: Have They Increased? International Monetary Fund, Working Paper, WP/19/53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781498302791.001Di Bella G., Dynnikova O., Slavov M.S.T. (2019). The Russian State’s Size and its Footprint: Have They Increased? International Monetary Fund, Working Paper, WP/19/53. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781498302791.001Dollar D., Hallward-Driemeier M., Mengistae T. (2005). Investment climate and firm performance in developing economies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431262Dollar D., Hallward-Driemeier M., Mengistae T. (2005). Investment climate and firm performance in developing economies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/431262Driffield N.L., Mickiewicz T., Temouri Y. (2013). Institutional reforms, productivity and profitability: from rents to competition? Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 583-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.08.001Driffield N.L., Mickiewicz T., Temouri Y. (2013). Institutional reforms, productivity and profitability: from rents to competition? Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 583-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.08.001Entov R. M, Lugovoy O. V. (2013). Growth trends in Russia after 1998. In book The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Entov R. M, Lugovoy O. V. (2013). Growth trends in Russia after 1998. In book The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Griliches Z. (1994). Poductivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint. American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 1–23.Griliches Z. (1994). Poductivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint. American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 1–23.Hulten C.R. (2001). Total factor productivity: a short biography. In New developments in productivity analysis. University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-54.Hulten C.R. (2001). Total factor productivity: a short biography. In New developments in productivity analysis. University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-54.Isik I. (2007). Bank ownership and productivity developments: evidence from Turkey. Studies in Economics and Finance, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 115-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10867370710756174Isik I. (2007). Bank ownership and productivity developments: evidence from Turkey. Studies in Economics and Finance, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 115-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10867370710756174Jorgenson D.W., Vu K.M. (2013). The Emergence of the New Economic Order: Growth in the G7 and the G20. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 389-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.03.001Jorgenson D.W., Vu K.M. (2013). The Emergence of the New Economic Order: Growth in the G7 and the G20. Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 389-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.03.001Jorgenson D.W, Griliches Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. The review of economic studies, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 249-283.Jorgenson D.W, Griliches Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. The review of economic studies, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 249-283.Kuboniwa M. (2011). Russian Growth Path and TFP Changes in Light of the Estimation of Production Function using Quarterly Data. Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 311-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2011.595269Kuboniwa M. (2011). Russian Growth Path and TFP Changes in Light of the Estimation of Production Function using Quarterly Data. Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 311-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2011.595269Kumbhakar S.C., Hjalmarsson L. (1998). Relative performance of public and private ownership under yardstick competition: electricity retail distribution. European Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 97-122.Kumbhakar S.C., Hjalmarsson L. (1998). Relative performance of public and private ownership under yardstick competition: electricity retail distribution. European Economic Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 97-122.Lee H., Lee K. (2022). Institutions matter differently depending on the ownership types of firms: Interacting effects on firm productivity in China. The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 67, No. 04, pp. 1185-1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217590818500224Lee H., Lee K. (2022). Institutions matter differently depending on the ownership types of firms: Interacting effects on firm productivity in China. The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 67, No. 04, pp. 1185-1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217590818500224Levinsohn J., Petrin A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246Levinsohn J., Petrin A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00246Lipsey R. G., Carlaw K. (2000). What Does Total Factor Productivity Measure? International Productivity Monitor, 2000, Vol. 1, pp. 31-40.Lipsey R. G., Carlaw K. (2000). What Does Total Factor Productivity Measure? International Productivity Monitor, 2000, Vol. 1, pp. 31-40.Nguyen T.V., Ho B. D., Le C.Q., Nguyen H.V. (2016). Strategic and transactional costs of corruption: perspectives from Vietnamese firms. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9609-7Nguyen T.V., Ho B. D., Le C.Q., Nguyen H.V. (2016). Strategic and transactional costs of corruption: perspectives from Vietnamese firms. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9609-7Nieto M.J., Santamaria L. (2010). Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of small business management, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 44-69.Nieto M.J., Santamaria L. (2010). Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of small business management, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 44-69.Olley G. S., Pakes A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 6, P. 1263.Olley G. S., Pakes A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 6, P. 1263.Van Ark B., Ozyildirim A., Bhide P., Crofoot E., Erumban A., Levanon G. (2015). Prioritizing productivity to drive growth, competitiveness, and profitability. The Conference Board.Van Ark B., Ozyildirim A., Bhide P., Crofoot E., Erumban A., Levanon G. (2015). Prioritizing productivity to drive growth, competitiveness, and profitability. The Conference Board.Van Beveren I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of economic surveys, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 98-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1004429Van Beveren I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of economic surveys, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 98-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1004429Voskoboynikov I. B. (2017) Sources of long run economic growth in Russia before and after the global financial crisis. Russian Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 348-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070227Voskoboynikov I. B. (2017) Sources of long run economic growth in Russia before and after the global financial crisis. Russian Journal of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 348-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070227Wooldridge J.M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics letters, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 112-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026Wooldridge J.M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics letters, Vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 112-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.