voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2018-4-129-148voprecotest-397Research ArticleОТЕЧЕСТВЕННАЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ МЫСЛЬ: ПРОШЛОЕ И НАСТОЯЩЕЕRUSSIAN ECONOMIC THOUGHT: PAST AND PRESENTДиаспора экономистов и российская экономическая наука: в поисках точек соприкосновенияDiaspora of economists and Russian economics: In search of common groundМальцевА. А.MaltsevA. A.

д. э. н., доцент кафедры мировой экономики Уральского государственного экономического университета (Екатеринбург)

almalzev@mail.ruУральский государственный экономический университетРоссияUral State University of EconomicsRussian Federation20182004201804129148Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20182018Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/397

В статье анализируются итоги проведенного в 2017 г. опроса 77 представителей российской диаспоры академических экономистов на предмет выявления различий в теоретических воззрениях между ее участниками и отечественными специалистами. Анализ показал, что имеющиеся расхождения в теоретико-методологических представлениях нельзя считать главной помехой для укрепления сотрудничества между двумя научными сообществами. Углублению участия российской диаспоры в академической жизни РФ препятствуют сохраняющийся скепсис части отечественных экономистов в отношении идей, поступающих в академическую среду «извне», а также забюрократизированность российской научно-образовательной сферы.

The article summarizes the results of a survey of 77 representatives of the Russian diaspora of academic economists (RDAE) carried out in the summer of 2017. Its main purpose was to find out the differences in theoretical views between RDAE members and Russian economists. The analysis has shown that the existing theoretical and methodological discrepancies are not the main obstacle for strengthening the cooperation between the two scientific communities. A key factor constraining the deepening of RDAE’s participation in the Russian academic life is the continuing skepticism of some of the Russian economists concerning the ideas coming from “outside”, as well as the bureaucratization of the Russian scientific and educational sphere.

мейнстримроссийская диаспора экономистовроссийская экономическая наукасоциология наукисоциология экономической наукиmainstreamRussian diaspora of economistsRussian economic sciencesociology of sciencesociology of economicsReferencesБаженов Г. А., Мальцев А. А. (2018). Современные гетеродоксальные направления экономической теории в контексте трансформации мейнстрима // Общество и экономика. № 1. С. 5-21Bazhenov G. A., Maltsev A. A. (2018). Modern heterodox directions of economic theory in the context of transformation of mainstream. Obshchestvo i Ekonomika, No. 1, pp. 5—21. (In Russian).Болдырев И. (2015). Академические барьеры: проблема изоляции академических сообществ в России // Окна роста. № 5. С. 1-2Boldyrev I. (2015). Academic barriers: The problem of isolation of the academic communities in Russia. Okna Rosta, No. 5, pp. 1—2. (In Russian).Григорьев Л. (2017). Два дискурса в российской экономической науке // Вопросы экономики. № 9. С. 135-159Grigoryev L. (2017). Two discourses in Russian economic science. Voprosy Еkonomiki, No. 9, pp. 135—159. (In Russian).Иванов И. С. (ред.). (2015). Развитие сотрудничества с русскоязычной научной диаспорой: опыт, проблемы, перспективы. М.: СпецкнигаIvanov I. S (ed.). (2015). Development of cooperation with the Russian-speaking scientific diaspora: Experience, problems, prospects. Moscow: Special book. (In Russian).Кузнецов А. (2013). Организационные меры для повышения эффективности научных исследований в России // Вопросы экономики. № 3. С. 83-93Kuznetsov A. Organizational measures for the growth of research efficiency in Russia. Voprosy Еkonomiki, No. 3, pp. 83—93. (In Russian).Мальцев А. (2016). Российское сообщество экономистов: особенности и перспективы // Вопросы экономики. № 11. С. 135-158Maltsev A. (2016). Russian community of economists: main features and perspectives. Voprosy Еkonomiki, No. 11, pp. 135—158. (In Russian).Мальцев А. А. (2018). Гетеродоксальная экономическая теория: текущее состояние и пути дальнейшего развития // Экономическая политика, [в печати]Maltsev A. A. (2018). Heterodox economics: current state and ways of further development. Ekonomicheskaya politika, [forthcoming]. (In Russian).Медведев Ю. (2009). Возвращенцы и невозвращенцы // Российская газета. 23 октябряMedvedev Yu. (2009). Returnees and non-returnees. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, October 23. (In Russian).Никитский клуб (2009). Научная диаспора и российская наука: в поисках взаимопонимания Вып. 38. М.: ММВБNikitskiy klub (2009). Scientific diaspora and Russian science: in search of mutual understanding, Issue 38. Moscow: MICEX. (In Russian).Попов Д. С., Творогова С. В., Федюкин И. И., Фрумин И. Д. (2011). Российская диаспора в области социальных и экономических наук: проблемы и перспективы сотрудничества // Мир России. № 1. С. 51- 71Popov D. S., Tvorogova S. V., Fedyukin I. I., Frumin I. D. (2011). Russian diaspora in the field of social and economic sciences: Problems and prospects of cooperation. Mir Rossii, No. 1, pp. 51—71. (In Russian).Радаев В. В. (2013). Российская социология в поисках новой идентичности // Социологические исследования. № 7. С. 4-18Radaev V. V. (2013). Russian sociology in search for its identity. Soziologicheskie Issledovanija, No. 7, pp. 4—18. (In Russian).Рубинштейн А. Я., Бураков Н. А., Славинская О. А. (2017). Сообщество экономистов и российские журналы (социологические измерения VS библиометрии). М.: ИЭ РАНRubinshtein A. Ya., Burakov N. A., Slavinskaya O. A. (2017). Community of economists and Russian journals (sociological measurements vs. bibliometrics). Moscow: IE RAS. (In Russian).Соколов М. М., Титаев К. Д. (2013). Провинциальная и туземная наука // Антропологический форум. № 19. С. 239-275Sokolov M. M., Titaev K. D. (2013). Provincial and indigenous science. Antropologicheskiy Forum, No. 19, pp. 239—275. (In Russian).Сонин К. И. (2011). Предисловие к русскому изданию // Скидельски Р. Кейнс: возвращение мастера. М.: Юнайтед Пресс, 2011Sonin K. I. (2011). Preface to the Russian edition. In: Skidelsky R. Keynes: The return of the master. Moscow: United Press, 2011. (In Russian).Aslanbeigui N., Oakes G. (2009). The provocative Joan Robinson: The making of a Cambridge economist. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.Aslanbeigui N., Oakes G. (2009). The provocative Joan Robinson: The making of a Cambridge economist. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.Backhouse R. E. (2010). Economics. In: Backhouse R. E., Fontaine P. (eds.). The history of the social sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Backhouse R. E. (2010). Economics. In: Backhouse R. E., Fontaine P. (eds.). The history of the social sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Barber W. J. (1996). Postwar changes in American graduate education in economics. In: A. B. Coats (ed.). The post-1945 internationalization of economics. London; Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Barber W. J. (1996). Postwar changes in American graduate education in economics. In: A. B. Coats (ed.). The post-1945 internationalization of economics. London; Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Boldyrev I., Kirtchik O. (2017). The сultures of mathematical economics in the postwar Soviet Union: More than a method, less than a discipline. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A. Vol. 63, pp. 1-10.Boldyrev I., Kirtchik O. (2017). The сultures of mathematical economics in the postwar Soviet Union: More than a method, less than a discipline. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A. Vol. 63, pp. 1-10.Cao C. (2008). China’s brain drain at the high end: Why government policies have failed to attract first-rate academics to return. Asian Population Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 331-345.Cao C. (2008). China’s brain drain at the high end: Why government policies have failed to attract first-rate academics to return. Asian Population Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 331-345.Caplan B. (1997). The critics of Keynesianism: A survey. Economic Notes, No. 76.Caplan B. (1997). The critics of Keynesianism: A survey. Economic Notes, No. 76.Choi Y. B. (1996). The americanization of economics in Korea. In: A. W. Coats (ed.). The post-1945 internationalization of economics. London; Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Choi Y. B. (1996). The americanization of economics in Korea. In: A. W. Coats (ed.). The post-1945 internationalization of economics. London; Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Cohn S. (2016). Western neoclassical vs Marxist economics in the PRC after Mao. Another kind of revolution? In: M. Warner (ed.). The diffusion of Western economic ideas in East Asia. London, New York: Routledge.Cohn S. (2016). Western neoclassical vs Marxist economics in the PRC after Mao. Another kind of revolution? In: M. Warner (ed.). The diffusion of Western economic ideas in East Asia. London, New York: Routledge.Cohn S.M. (2017). Competing economic paradigms in China: The co-evolution of economic events, economic theory and economics education, 1976-2016. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.Cohn S.M. (2017). Competing economic paradigms in China: The co-evolution of economic events, economic theory and economics education, 1976-2016. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.Colander D., Holt R.P.F., Rosser J.B. (2007). Live and dead issues in the methodology of economics. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 303-312.Colander D., Holt R.P.F., Rosser J.B. (2007). Live and dead issues in the methodology of economics. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 303-312.Colander D. (2007). Pluralism and heterodox economics: Suggestions for an “inside the mainstream” heterodoxy. Middlebury College Economics Discussion Paper, No. 07-24.Colander D. (2007). Pluralism and heterodox economics: Suggestions for an “inside the mainstream” heterodoxy. Middlebury College Economics Discussion Paper, No. 07-24.Colander D., Holt R., Rosser J. B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 485-499.Colander D., Holt R., Rosser J. B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 485-499.Emmett R. B. (2016). Economics. In: G. M. Montgomery, M. A. Largent (eds.). A companion to the history of American science. Malden; Oxford: Wiley.Emmett R. B. (2016). Economics. In: G. M. Montgomery, M. A. Largent (eds.). A companion to the history of American science. Malden; Oxford: Wiley.Fleck C. (2011). A transatlantic history of the social sciences robber barons, the Third Reich and the invention of empirical social research. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Fleck C. (2011). A transatlantic history of the social sciences robber barons, the Third Reich and the invention of empirical social research. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Hagemann H. (2011). European émigrés and the ‘Americanization’ of economics. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 643-671.Hagemann H. (2011). European émigrés and the ‘Americanization’ of economics. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 643-671.Hannas W. S., Mulvenon J., Puglisi A. B. (2013). Chinese industrial espionage: Technology acquisition and military modernisation. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.Hannas W. S., Mulvenon J., Puglisi A. B. (2013). Chinese industrial espionage: Technology acquisition and military modernisation. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.Hao X., Yan K., Guo S., Wang M. (2017). Chinese returnees’ motivation, post-return dtatus and impact of return: A systematic review. Asian and Pacific Academic Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 143-157.Hao X., Yan K., Guo S., Wang M. (2017). Chinese returnees’ motivation, post-return dtatus and impact of return: A systematic review. Asian and Pacific Academic Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 143-157.Kirtchik O. (2012). Limits and strategies for the internationalization of Russian economic science: Sociological interpretation of bibliometric data. Laboratorium, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 19-44.Kirtchik O. (2012). Limits and strategies for the internationalization of Russian economic science: Sociological interpretation of bibliometric data. Laboratorium, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 19-44.Krohn C.-P. (1993). Intellectuals in exile: Refugee scholars and the New School for Social Research. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Krohn C.-P. (1993). Intellectuals in exile: Refugee scholars and the New School for Social Research. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Libman A., Zweynert J. (2014). Ceremonial science: The state of Russian economics seen through the lens of the work of ‘Doctor of Science’ candidates. Economic Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 360-378.Libman A., Zweynert J. (2014). Ceremonial science: The state of Russian economics seen through the lens of the work of ‘Doctor of Science’ candidates. Economic Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 360-378.Lin J. Y. (2007). Creating a market-oriented research and education institution in a transition economy. The experience of the China centre for economic research at Peking University. In: F. Bourguignon, Y. Elkana, B. Pleskovic (eds.). Capacity building in economics education and research. Washington, DC: World Bank.Lin J. Y. (2007). Creating a market-oriented research and education institution in a transition economy. The experience of the China centre for economic research at Peking University. In: F. Bourguignon, Y. Elkana, B. Pleskovic (eds.). Capacity building in economics education and research. Washington, DC: World Bank.Lyon J. K. (1980). Bertolt Brecht in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Lyon J. K. (1980). Bertolt Brecht in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Petr J. L. (1998). The social conscience of an American economist: Alvin S. Johnson as advocate/reformer. In: M. Rutherford (ed.). The economic mind in America: Essays in the history of American economics. London; New York: Routledge.Petr J. L. (1998). The social conscience of an American economist: Alvin S. Johnson as advocate/reformer. In: M. Rutherford (ed.). The economic mind in America: Essays in the history of American economics. London; New York: Routledge.Romero J. (2013). Where are the women? Econ Focus, Second Quarter, p. 12.Romero J. (2013). Where are the women? Econ Focus, Second Quarter, p. 12.Rosser J.B. Jr., Holt R., Colander D. (eds.). (2010). European economics at a crossroads. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.Rosser J.B. Jr., Holt R., Colander D. (eds.). (2010). European economics at a crossroads. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.Rutherford M. (2011). The institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918-1947: Science and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Rutherford M. (2011). The institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918-1947: Science and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Samuelson P. (1988). The passing of the guard in economics. Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 319-329.Samuelson P. (1988). The passing of the guard in economics. Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 319-329.Samuelson P. (2007). An interview with Paul A. Samuelson. In: P. A. Samuelson, W. A. Barnett (eds.). Inside the economist’s mind: Conversations with eminent economists. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Samuelson P. (2007). An interview with Paul A. Samuelson. In: P. A. Samuelson, W. A. Barnett (eds.). Inside the economist’s mind: Conversations with eminent economists. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Scherer F.M. (2000). The emigration of German-speaking economists after 1933. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 614-626.Scherer F.M. (2000). The emigration of German-speaking economists after 1933. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 614-626.Vaughn K. I. (1994). Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Vaughn K. I. (1994). Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.