voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2022-7-104-122voprecotest-3911Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ИСТОРИЯ И ИСТОРИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ МЫСЛИECONOMIC HISTORY AND HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHTТри источника и три героя маржиналистской революцииThree sources and three heroes of the Marginal Revolutionhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8169-729XАвтономовВ. С.AvtonomovV. S.

Автономов Владимир Сергеевич, чл.-корр. РАН, д. э. н., заслуженный профессор, руководитель Центра истории и методологии экономической науки; завcектором

Москва

Vladimir S. Avtonomov

Moscow

vavtonomov@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»; Национальный исследовательский институт мировой экономики и международных отношений имени Е. М. Примакова РАНРоссияHSE University; Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation20220207202207104122Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20222022Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/3911

Статья посвящена 150-летней годовщине маржиналистской революции. Рассматриваются идейные традиции, сформировавшие контекст для работ У. С. Джевонса, К. Менгера и Л. Вальраса. Британская эмпиристскоутилитаристская традиция, вдохновившая Джевонса, немецкая субъективистская традиция, достигшая кульминации в работе Менгера, и французская картезианская традиция, черты которой заметны в творчестве Вальраса, породили схожие теории ценности и цены, основанные на предельной полезности. Все три способствовали возникновению строгой экономической теории. Но формы, которые приняли эти теории, а также виды политики, которые рекомендовали их создатели, были очень различными, и эти различия во многом можно объяснить специфическими национальными источниками.

The article is devoted to the 150th anniversary of Marginal Revolution and deals with “patristic legacies” leading to the works of William Stanley Jevons, Carl Menger and Léon Walras. The British empiricist-utilitarian tradition which inspired Jevons, the German subjectivist tradition culminating in the work of Menger, and the French Cartesian tradition, the traits of which can be easily seen in Walras, happened to give birth to similar theories of value and price based on marginal utility. All three also contributed to the creation of exact economic science. But the forms their theories took, as well as the policies they recommended, were very different and this difference could be explained by the different, nationally specific sources of their thought.

история экономической наукимаржиналистская революцияфилософия и экономическая наукаhistory of economicsMarginal Revolutionphilosophy and economicsReferencesАвтономов В. С. и др. (ред.) (2015). Истоки: качественные сдвиги в экономической реальности и экономической науке. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ.Avtonomov V. S. et al. (eds.) (2015). The sources: Qualitative changes in economic reality and economic science. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).Блауг М. (1994). Экономическая мысль в ретроспективе. М.: Дело.Blaug M. (1994). Economics in retrospect. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).Вальрас Л. (2000). Элементы чистой политической экономии, или Теория общественного богатства. М.: Изограф.Walras L. (2000). Les eléments d’ économie politique pure. Moscow: Izograf. (In Russan).Джевонс У. С. (2021). Теория политической экономии. Челябинск: Социум.Jevons W. S. (2021). The theory of political economy. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium. (In Russian).Менгер К. (2005). Избранные работы. М.: Территория будущего.Menger C. (2005). Selected works. Moscow: Territoria Budushchego. (In Russian).Чаплыгина И. Г. (2020). Камерализм и философия естественного права // Terra Economicus. Т. 18, № 4. С. 97—110. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-4-97-110Chaplygina I. G. (2020). Cameralism and the tradition of natural law. Terra Economicus, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 97—110. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-4-97-110Шумпетер Й. (2001). История экономического анализа. Т. 3. СПб.: Экономическая школа.Schumpeter J. (2001). A history of economic analysis, Vol. 3. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya Shkola. (In Russian).Шумпетер Й. (2011). Десять великих экономистов от Маркса до Кейнса. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.Schumpeter J. (2011). Ten great economists from Marx till Keynes. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).Baranzini R., Allisson F. (2016). Lausanne school. In: H. Kurz, G. Faccarello (eds.). Handbook on the history of economic analysis, Vol. II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, рр. 281—294.Baranzini R., Allisson F. (2016). Lausanne school. In: H. Kurz, G. Faccarello (eds.). Handbook on the history of economic analysis, Vol. II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, рр. 281—294.Blaug M. (1973). Was there a Marginal Revolution? In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, , рр. 3—14.Blaug M. (1973). Was there a Marginal Revolution? In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, , рр. 3—14.Collison Black R. D. (1973). W. S. Jevons and the foundation of modern economics. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, рр. 98—112.Collison Black R. D. (1973). W. S. Jevons and the foundation of modern economics. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, рр. 98—112.Collison Black R. D., Coats A. W., Goodwin C. D. W. (eds.) (1973). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press.Collison Black R. D., Coats A. W., Goodwin C. D. W. (eds.) (1973). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press.Colm S.-C. (1993). L é on Walras’ correspondence and related papers: The birth of mathematical economics. In: J. Cunningham Wood (ed.). Léon Walras: Critical assesssments, Vol. 1. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 81—93.Colm S.-C. (1993). L é on Walras’ correspondence and related papers: The birth of mathematical economics. In: J. Cunningham Wood (ed.). Léon Walras: Critical assesssments, Vol. 1. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 81—93.Fourcade M. (2009). Economists and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Fourcade M. (2009). Economists and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Frey B., Eichenberger R. (1993). American and European economics and economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 185—193. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.4.185Frey B., Eichenberger R. (1993). American and European economics and economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 185—193. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.4.185Howey R. S. (1973). The origins of Marginalism. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 15—36.Howey R. S. (1973). The origins of Marginalism. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 15—36.Hufeland G. (1807). Neue Grundlegung der Staatswirtschaftskunst. Giessen und Wetzlar: Tasché & Müller.Hufeland G. (1807). Neue Grundlegung der Staatswirtschaftskunst. Giessen und Wetzlar: Tasché & Müller.Hutcheson F. (1971). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue. Hildesheim: Georg Ohlms Verlagsbuchhandlung.Hutcheson F. (1971). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue. Hildesheim: Georg Ohlms Verlagsbuchhandlung.Hutchison T. W. (1973). The “Marginal Revolution” and the decline and fall of English classical political economy. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 176—202.Hutchison T. W. (1973). The “Marginal Revolution” and the decline and fall of English classical political economy. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 176—202.Jaffé W. (1973). L éon Walras’s role in the “Marginal Revolution”. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 113—139.Jaffé W. (1973). L éon Walras’s role in the “Marginal Revolution”. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 113—139.Jevons W. S. (1882). The state in relation to labour. London: Macmillan.Jevons W. S. (1882). The state in relation to labour. London: Macmillan.Kauder E. (1957). Intellectual and political roots of the older Austrian school. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie. Bd. 17, H. 4, pp. 411—425.Kauder E. (1957). Intellectual and political roots of the older Austrian school. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie. Bd. 17, H. 4, pp. 411—425.Kirzner I. (1990). Liberalism and the Austrian school. In: B. Caldwell (ed.). Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham and London: Duke University Press, рр. 93—106.Kirzner I. (1990). Liberalism and the Austrian school. In: B. Caldwell (ed.). Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham and London: Duke University Press, рр. 93—106.Kurz H. (2016). German and Austrian schools. In: H. Kurz, G. Faccarello (eds.). Handbook on the history of economic analysis, Vol. II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 252—273.Kurz H. (2016). German and Austrian schools. In: H. Kurz, G. Faccarello (eds.). Handbook on the history of economic analysis, Vol. II. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 252—273.Maas H. (2005). William Stanley Jevons and the making of modern economics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Maas H. (2005). William Stanley Jevons and the making of modern economics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Milford K. (1997). Hufeland als Vorläufer von Menger und Hayek. In: B. P. Priddat (Hrsg.). Wert, Meinung, Bedeutung: die Tradition der subjektiven Wertlehre in der deutschen Nationalökonomie vor Menger. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, S. 89—160.Milford K. (1997). Hufeland als Vorläufer von Menger und Hayek. In: B. P. Priddat (Hrsg.). Wert, Meinung, Bedeutung: die Tradition der subjektiven Wertlehre in der deutschen Nationalökonomie vor Menger. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, S. 89—160.Mosselmans B. (2007). William Stanley Jevons and the cutting edge of economics. London and New York: Routledge.Mosselmans B. (2007). William Stanley Jevons and the cutting edge of economics. London and New York: Routledge.Perlman M., McCann C. R. Jr. (1998). The pillars of economic understanding: Ideas and traditions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Perlman M., McCann C. R. Jr. (1998). The pillars of economic understanding: Ideas and traditions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Pribram K. (1983). A history of economic reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Pribram K. (1983). A history of economic reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Shackle G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics & economics: A critique of economic doctrines. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Shackle G. L. S. (1972). Epistemics & economics: A critique of economic doctrines. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Silverman P. (1990). The cameralist roots of Menger’s achievements. In: B. Caldwell (ed.). Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 69—92.Silverman P. (1990). The cameralist roots of Menger’s achievements. In: B. Caldwell (ed.). Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 69—92.Stigler G. (1965). Essays in the history of economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Stigler G. (1965). Essays in the history of economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Streissler E. (1973). To what extent was the Austrian school Marginalist? In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 160—175.Streissler E. (1973). To what extent was the Austrian school Marginalist? In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 160—175.Streissler E. (1977). Carl Menger, der deutsche Nationalökonom. In: B. P. Priddat (Hrsg.). Wert, Meinung, Bedeutung: Die Tradition der subjektiven Wertlehre in der deutschen Nationalökonomie vor Menger. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, S. 33—88.Streissler E. (1977). Carl Menger, der deutsche Nationalökonom. In: B. P. Priddat (Hrsg.). Wert, Meinung, Bedeutung: Die Tradition der subjektiven Wertlehre in der deutschen Nationalökonomie vor Menger. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, S. 33—88.Streissler E. (1990). The influence of German economics on the work of Menger and Marshall. In: B. Caldwell (ed.). Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 31—68.Streissler E. (1990). The influence of German economics on the work of Menger and Marshall. In: B. Caldwell (ed.). Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 31—68.Tarascio V. J. (1993). Leon Walras: On the occasion of the publication of his correspondence and related papers. In: J. Cunningham Wood (ed.). Léon Walras: Critical assessments, Vol. I. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 63—80.Tarascio V. J. (1993). Leon Walras: On the occasion of the publication of his correspondence and related papers. In: J. Cunningham Wood (ed.). Léon Walras: Critical assessments, Vol. I. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 63—80.Winch D. (1973). Marginalism and the boundaries of economic science. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 59—77.Winch D. (1973). Marginalism and the boundaries of economic science. In: R. D. Collison Black, A. W. Coats, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.). The Marginal Revolution in economics: Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 59—77.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.