voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-45-69voprecotest-3727Research ArticleВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИISSUES OF THEORYБудущее плюралистичной институциональной теорииThe future of pluralistic institutional theoryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-2725ФроловД. П.FrolovD. P.

Фролов Даниил Петрович, доктор экономических наук, профессор кафедры экономики и предпринимательства

Волгоград

Daniil P. Frolov

Volgograd

ecodev@mail.ruВолгоградский государственный технический университетРоссияVolgograd State Technical UniversityRussian Federation202207042022044569Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20222022Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/3727

В статье подвергаются критике устойчивые стереотипы о современном состоянии и логике развития институциональной экономики. Эти стереотипы основаны на недооценке роста ее внутреннего разнообразия, размывании методологических границ новой и оригинальной институциональных экономических теорий (НИЭТ и ОИЭТ), возникновении многочисленных альтернативных институционализмов. Анализ истории развития ОИЭТ и НИЭТ показывает, что их конкуренция прекратилась, сменившись методологическим обменом, а исследовательские программы становятся все более неоднородными и эклектичными. Большое значение приобретают альтернативные институционализмы — междисциплинарные течения, посвященные новым трендам в анализе институтов. Предлагается перейти от нарратива о борьбе НИЭТ и ОИЭТ к переосмыслению институциональной экономики как континуума коэволюционирующих и взаимодополняющих школ и подходов. Приводятся аргументы в пользу сценария формирования институциональной теории, базирующейся на эпистемологическом плюрализме, сочетании качественных и количественных методов, переходе к постдисциплинарности. Плюралистичная парадигма может стать адекватным ответом на вызов качественного роста институциональной сложности экономики.

The article criticizes the stereotypes about the current state of institutional economics and the logic of its development. These stereotypes are based on underestimating the growth of its internal diversity, blurring the methodological boundaries of new and original institutional economics (NIE and OIE), the emergence of numerous alternative institutionalisms. The history of OIE and NIE shows that their competition has been replaced by methodological exchange, and research programs are becoming more heterogeneous and eclectic. Alternative institutionalisms — interdisciplinary movements focused on new trends in the analysis of institutions — are of growing importance. The paper proposes to move from the narrative about the struggle between NIE and OIE to rethinking institutional economics as a continuum of co-evolving and complementary schools and approaches. The article makes the case for creating an institutional theory based on epistemological pluralism, a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, and the transition to postdisciplinarity. A pluralistic paradigm can be an adequate response to the challenge of increasing institutional complexity in modern economies.

 

институционализмновая институциональная экономическая теорияоригинальная институциональная экономическая теорияинститутыметодологияinstitutionalismnew institutional economicsoriginal institutional economicsinstitutionsmethodologyИсследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 21-18-00271ReferencesАвтономов В. С. (2013). Абстракция — мать порядка? (историко-методологические рассуждения о связи экономической науки и экономической политики) // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 4—23. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-4-4-23Avtonomov V. S. (2013). Abstraction as a mother of order? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 4—23. (In Russian).] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-4-4-23Вольчик В. В. (2020). Нарративы и понимание экономических институтов // Terra Economicus. Т. 18, № 2. С. 49—69.Volchik V. V. (2020). Narratives and understanding of economic institutions. Terra Economicus, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 49—69. (In Russian).Норт Д. (1997). Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги «Начала».North D. (1997). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Moscow: Nachala. (In Russian).Тамбовцев В. Л. (2020). Непродуктивность попыток методологического синтеза // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 3. С. 7—31.Tambovtsev V. L. (2020). Unproductivity of the methodological fusion’s attempts. Theoretical Economics, No. 3, pp. 7—31. (In Russian).Тамбовцев В. Л. (2021a). Возможна ли единая институциональная экономическая теория? // Вопросы экономики. № 1. С. 33—51. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-33-51Tambovtsev V. L. (2021a). Is unified institutional economics possible? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 1, pp. 33—51. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-33-51Тамбовцев В. Л. (2021b). Институционализмы в экономической науке: что стоит за их разнообразием? // Журнал институциональных исследований. Т. 13, № 1. С. 20—36. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.1.020-036Tambovtsev V. L. (2021b). Institutionalisms in economics: What are behinds their variety? Journal of Institutional Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 20—36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.1.020-036Тутов Л. А., Шаститко А. Е. (2021). Метаязык внутридисциплинарного дискурса для научно-исследовательских программ: приглашение к разговору // Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 96—115. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-96-115Tutov L. A., Shastitko A. E. (2021). Metalanguage within disciplinary discourse for scientific research programs: Invitation to a debate. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 4, pp. 96—115. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-4-96-115Фролов Д. П. (2020). Постинституционализм: за пределами институционального мейнстрима // Вопросы экономики. № 5. С. 107—140. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-5-107-140Frolov D. P. (2020). Postinstitutionalism: Beyond the institutional mainstream. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 107—140. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-5-107-140Ходжсон Дж. М. (2003). Экономическая теория и институты: Манифест современной институциональной экономической теории. М.: Дело.Hodgson G. M. (2003). Economics and institutions: A manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Moscow: Delo. (In Russian).Alston E., Law W., Murtazashvili I., Weiss M. (2022). Blockchain networks as constitutional and competitive polycentric orders. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100093XAlston E., Law W., Murtazashvili I., Weiss M. (2022). Blockchain networks as constitutional and competitive polycentric orders. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100093XAvtonomov V., Avtonomov Y. (2019). Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 179—194.Avtonomov V., Avtonomov Y. (2019). Four Methodenstreits between behavioral and mainstream economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 179—194.Bates R. H., Greif A., Levi M., Rosenthal J.-L., Weingast B. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Bates R. H., Greif A., Levi M., Rosenthal J.-L., Weingast B. R. (1998). Analytic narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Boldyrev I., Svetlova E. (eds.) (2016). Enacting dismal science: New perspectives on the performativity of economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Boldyrev I., Svetlova E. (eds.) (2016). Enacting dismal science: New perspectives on the performativity of economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Breit W., De Gregori T. R., Gruchy A. G., Hamilton D. (1976). Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists. A study in the social philosophy of economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 943—957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624. 1976.11503397Breit W., De Gregori T. R., Gruchy A. G., Hamilton D. (1976). Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists. A study in the social philosophy of economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 943—957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624. 1976.11503397Burns S., Fuller C. S. (2020). Institutions and entrepreneurship: Pushing the boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3—4, pp. 568—612. https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010080Burns S., Fuller C. S. (2020). Institutions and entrepreneurship: Pushing the boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3—4, pp. 568—612. https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010080Cardinale I. (2018). Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 132—155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0020Cardinale I. (2018). Beyond constraining and enabling: Toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 132—155. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0020Casas-Klett T., Li J. (2021). Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp. 1—17.Casas-Klett T., Li J. (2021). Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative as a narrative: Implications for institutional change and international firm strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, pp. 1—17.Cleaver F. D., de Koning J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1—18. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.605Cleaver F. D., de Koning J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1—18. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.605Coase R. H. (1984). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp. 229—231.Coase R. H. (1984). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 140, No. 1, pp. 229—231.Coase R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Coase R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Cornelissen J. P., Durand R., Fiss P. C., Lammers J. C., Vaara E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 10—27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381Cornelissen J. P., Durand R., Fiss P. C., Lammers J. C., Vaara E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 10—27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381Courvisanos J., Doughney J., Millmow A. (eds.) (2016). Reclaiming pluralism in economics. London, New York: Routledge.Courvisanos J., Doughney J., Millmow A. (eds.) (2016). Reclaiming pluralism in economics. London, New York: Routledge.D’Amico D., Martin A. (2022). Introduction to the symposium on institutional analysis, market processes, and interdisciplinary social science. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000941D’Amico D., Martin A. (2022). Introduction to the symposium on institutional analysis, market processes, and interdisciplinary social science. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000941Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 639—658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 639—658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200De Vries P. (2022). New institutional economics as situational logic. New York: Routledge [forthcoming].De Vries P. (2022). New institutional economics as situational logic. New York: Routledge [forthcoming].DiMaggio P. (1998). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 154, No. 4, pp. 696—705.DiMaggio P. (1998). The new institutionalisms: Avenues of collaboration. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 154, No. 4, pp. 696—705.Dopfer K., Foster J., Potts J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 263—279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0Dopfer K., Foster J., Potts J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 263—279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0Elsner W. (2010). The process and a simple logic of ‘meso’. Emergence and the co-evolution of institutions and group size. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 445—477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0158-4Elsner W. (2010). The process and a simple logic of ‘meso’. Emergence and the co-evolution of institutions and group size. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 445—477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-009-0158-4Frolov D. (2021). Blockchain and the institutional complexity: An extended institutional approach. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 21—36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000272Frolov D. (2021). Blockchain and the institutional complexity: An extended institutional approach. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 21—36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000272Frolov D. (2022). Crafting cognitive institutions for overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137422000030Frolov D. (2022). Crafting cognitive institutions for overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137422000030Gallagher S. (2020). Action and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Gallagher S. (2020). Action and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Gräbner C. (2015). Agent-based computational models — a formal heuristic for institutionalist pattern modelling? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 241—261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000193Gräbner C. (2015). Agent-based computational models — a formal heuristic for institutionalist pattern modelling? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 241—261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000193Gräbner C., Kapeller J. (2015). New perspectives on institutionalist pattern modeling: Systemism, complexity, and agent-based modeling. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 433—440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1042765Gräbner C., Kapeller J. (2015). New perspectives on institutionalist pattern modeling: Systemism, complexity, and agent-based modeling. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 433—440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1042765Gräbner C., Strunk B. (2020). Pluralism in economics: Its critiques and their lessons. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 311—329.Gräbner C., Strunk B. (2020). Pluralism in economics: Its critiques and their lessons. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 311—329.Grandori A. (2021). Pushing the boundaries of Williamson’s ‘science of economic organization’ — knowledge and pluralism challenges. Unpublished manuscript. https://extranet.sioe.org/uploads/sioe2021/grandori.pdfGrandori A. (2021). Pushing the boundaries of Williamson’s ‘science of economic organization’ — knowledge and pluralism challenges. Unpublished manuscript. https://extranet.sioe.org/uploads/sioe2021/grandori.pdfGreif A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Greif A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Greif A., Mokyr J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25—52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000370Greif A., Mokyr J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25—52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000370Haack P., Sieweke J., Wessel L. (eds.) (2020). Microfoundations of institutions. In 2 vols. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Haack P., Sieweke J., Wessel L. (eds.) (2020). Microfoundations of institutions. In 2 vols. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Hallett T., Hawbaker A. (2020). Bringing society back in again: The importance of social interaction in an inhabited institutionalism. In: P. Haack, J. Sieweke, L. Wessel (eds.). Microfoundations of institutions. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 317—336. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B024Hallett T., Hawbaker A. (2020). Bringing society back in again: The importance of social interaction in an inhabited institutionalism. In: P. Haack, J. Sieweke, L. Wessel (eds.). Microfoundations of institutions. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, pp. 317—336. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B024Hallett T., Ventresca M. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s “Patterns of industrial bureaucracy”. Theory and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 213—236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9003-zHallett T., Ventresca M. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s “Patterns of industrial bureaucracy”. Theory and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 213—236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9003-zHindriks F., Guala F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: A unified theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 459—480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000496Hindriks F., Guala F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: A unified theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 459—480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000496Hodgson G. (2014). On fuzzy frontiers and fragmented foundations: Some reflections on the original and new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 591—611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000307Hodgson G. (2014). On fuzzy frontiers and fragmented foundations: Some reflections on the original and new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 591—611. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000307Hodgson G. M. (2016). The future of work in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 197—216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1148469Hodgson G. M. (2016). The future of work in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 197—216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1148469Hodgson G. M., Samuels W. J., Tool M. R. (eds.) (1994). The Elgar companion to institutional and evolutionary economics. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Hodgson G. M., Samuels W. J., Tool M. R. (eds.) (1994). The Elgar companion to institutional and evolutionary economics. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Jacobsen M. H. (2019). Introduction: The coming of critical and cultural interactionisms. In: M. H. Jacobsen (ed.). Critical and cultural interactionism insights from sociology and criminology. New York: Routledge, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315141640-1Jacobsen M. H. (2019). Introduction: The coming of critical and cultural interactionisms. In: M. H. Jacobsen (ed.). Critical and cultural interactionism insights from sociology and criminology. New York: Routledge, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315141640-1Keen S. (2021). The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Globalizations, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 1149—1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807856Keen S. (2021). The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change. Globalizations, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 1149—1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807856Kesting S., Negru I., Silvestri P. (2020). Institutional analysis and the gift: An introduction to the symposium. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 665—674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000223Kesting S., Negru I., Silvestri P. (2020). Institutional analysis and the gift: An introduction to the symposium. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 665—674. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000223Klaes M. (2004). Evolutionary economics: In defence of ‘vagueness’. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 359—376. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178042000252992Klaes M. (2004). Evolutionary economics: In defence of ‘vagueness’. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 359—376. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178042000252992Klein P. A. (1989). Institutionalism confronts the 1990s. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 545—553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1989.11504920Klein P. A. (1989). Institutionalism confronts the 1990s. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 545—553. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1989.11504920Lari T. (2021). When does complementarity support pluralism about schools of economic thought? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 322—335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1945659Lari T. (2021). When does complementarity support pluralism about schools of economic thought? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 322—335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1945659Latour B. (2005). Re-assembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Latour B. (2005). Re-assembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Lawrence T., Suddaby R., Leca B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 52—58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222Lawrence T., Suddaby R., Leca B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 52—58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222Lawson T. (2015). Essays on the nature and state of modern economics. London; New York: Routledge.Lawson T. (2015). Essays on the nature and state of modern economics. London; New York: Routledge.Lok J. (2020). Theorizing the ‘I’ in institutional theory: Moving forward through theoretical fragmentation, not integration. In: A. D. Brown (ed.). The Oxford handbook of identities in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 732—749. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827115.013.16Lok J. (2020). Theorizing the ‘I’ in institutional theory: Moving forward through theoretical fragmentation, not integration. In: A. D. Brown (ed.). The Oxford handbook of identities in organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 732—749. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827115.013.16Lounsbury M., Anderson D. A., Spee P. (eds.) (2021). On practice and institution: Theorizing the interface. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X202070Lounsbury M., Anderson D. A., Spee P. (eds.) (2021). On practice and institution: Theorizing the interface. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X202070Ménard C. (2020). Please, open the windows! Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 427—428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000089Ménard C. (2020). Please, open the windows! Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 427—428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000089Ménard C., Shirley M. (2014). The future of new institutional economics: From early intuitions to a new paradigm? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 541—565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741400006XMénard C., Shirley M. (2014). The future of new institutional economics: From early intuitions to a new paradigm? Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 541—565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741400006XMénard C., Shirley M. M. (2018). Introduction. In: C. Ménard, M. M. Shirley (eds.). A research agenda for new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, рр. 1—5. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112512.00006Ménard C., Shirley M. M. (2018). Introduction. In: C. Ménard, M. M. Shirley (eds.). A research agenda for new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, рр. 1—5. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112512.00006Ménard C., Shirley M. M. (2022). Advanced introduction to new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarMénard C., Shirley M. M. (2022). Advanced introduction to new institutional economics. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarMokyr J. (2016). A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1wf4dftMokyr J. (2016). A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1wf4dftMorgan G., Campbell J. L., Crouch C., Pedersen O. K., Whitley R. (eds.) (2010). The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233762.001.0001Morgan G., Campbell J. L., Crouch C., Pedersen O. K., Whitley R. (eds.) (2010). The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199233762.001.0001Myrdal G. (1978). Institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 771—783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503577Myrdal G. (1978). Institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 771—783. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503577Nelson R. R., Dosi G., Helfat C., Pyka A., Saviotti P., Lee K., Dopfer K., Malerba F., Winter S. (2018). Modern evolutionary economics: An overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928Nelson R. R., Dosi G., Helfat C., Pyka A., Saviotti P., Lee K., Dopfer K., Malerba F., Winter S. (2018). Modern evolutionary economics: An overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661928Newen A., De Bruin L., Gallagher S. (2018). 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues. In: A. Newen, L. De Bruin, S. Gallagher (eds.). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4—18.Newen A., De Bruin L., Gallagher S. (2018). 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues. In: A. Newen, L. De Bruin, S. Gallagher (eds.). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4—18.Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Ostrom E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Panhans M. T., Schumacher R. (2021). Theory in closer contact with industrial life: American institutional economists on competition theory and policy. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 5, рр. 781—798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000357Panhans M. T., Schumacher R. (2021). Theory in closer contact with industrial life: American institutional economists on competition theory and policy. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 5, рр. 781—798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000357Petracca E., Gallagher S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 747—765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000144Petracca E., Gallagher S. (2020). Economic cognitive institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 747—765. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000144Poteete A., Janssen M., Ostrom E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Poteete A., Janssen M., Ostrom E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Pratt M. G., Sonenshein S., Feldman M. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 211—238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466Pratt M. G., Sonenshein S., Feldman M. S. (2022). Moving beyond templates: A bricolage approach to conducting trustworthy qualitative research. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 211—238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120927466Reinert E. S. (2007). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable.Reinert E. S. (2007). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable.Rodrik D. (2015). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. Oxford: WW Norton & Company.Rodrik D. (2015). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. Oxford: WW Norton & Company.Rosenbaum E. (2021). Mental models and institutional inertia. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100059XRosenbaum E. (2021). Mental models and institutional inertia. Journal of Institutional Economics, [forthcoming]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413742100059XRutherford M. (1994). Institutions in economics: The old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Rutherford M. (1994). Institutions in economics: The old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Samuels W. J. (ed.) (1988). Institutional economics. Vol. I-III. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Samuels W. J. (ed.) (1988). Institutional economics. Vol. I-III. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Samuels W. J. (1995). The present state of institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 569—590. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035331Samuels W. J. (1995). The present state of institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 569—590. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035331Schmidt V. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1—25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021XSchmidt V. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1—25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021XSchmidt V. A. (2019). Where might the next generation of progressive ideas and programmes come from? Contemporary discontents, future possibilities for Europe. In: P. Diamond (ed.). The crisis of globalization: Democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London: I. B. Tauris, рр. 167—186.Schmidt V. A. (2019). Where might the next generation of progressive ideas and programmes come from? Contemporary discontents, future possibilities for Europe. In: P. Diamond (ed.). The crisis of globalization: Democracy, capitalism and inequality in the twenty-first century. London: I. B. Tauris, рр. 167—186.Seckler D. (1975). Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists: A study in the social philosophy of economics. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.Seckler D. (1975). Thorstein Veblen and the institutionalists: A study in the social philosophy of economics. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.Seligson D., McCants A. (2021). Coevolving institutions and the paradox of informal constraints. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 359—378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000600Seligson D., McCants A. (2021). Coevolving institutions and the paradox of informal constraints. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 359—378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000600Shiller R. J. (2019). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189970Shiller R. J. (2019). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189970Shirley M. (2020). How should economists analyze institutions? Comments on David Skarbek, ‘Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis’. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 429—431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000053Shirley M. (2020). How should economists analyze institutions? Comments on David Skarbek, ‘Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis’. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 429—431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000053Sindzingre A. N. (2021). Concept and causation: Issues in the modelling of institutions. Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 194—213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2016.1263230Sindzingre A. N. (2021). Concept and causation: Issues in the modelling of institutions. Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 194—213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2016.1263230Skarbek D. (2020). Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 409—422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741900078XSkarbek D. (2020). Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 409—422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741900078XStanfield J. R. (1999). The scope, method, and significance of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 231—255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506154Stanfield J. R. (1999). The scope, method, and significance of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 231—255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1999.11506154Stilwell F. (2019). From economics to political economy: Contradictions, challenge, and change. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 35—62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12259Stilwell F. (2019). From economics to political economy: Contradictions, challenge, and change. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 35—62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12259Storm S. (2021). Cordon of conformity: Why DSGE models are not the future of macroeconomics. International Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 77—98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1929582Storm S. (2021). Cordon of conformity: Why DSGE models are not the future of macroeconomics. International Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 77—98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2021.1929582Teorell J., Coppedge M., Lindberg S., Skaaning S.-E. (2019). Measuring polyarchy across the globe, 1900—2017. Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 71—95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9268-zTeorell J., Coppedge M., Lindberg S., Skaaning S.-E. (2019). Measuring polyarchy across the globe, 1900—2017. Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 71—95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9268-zThomson J. (2017). Resisting gendered change: Feminist institutionalism and critical actors. International Political Science Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 178—191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116677844Thomson J. (2017). Resisting gendered change: Feminist institutionalism and critical actors. International Political Science Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 178—191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116677844Tool M. R. (ed.) (1988). Evolutionary economics. Vol. I-II. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Tool M. R. (ed.) (1988). Evolutionary economics. Vol. I-II. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Tool M. R. (ed.) (1993). Institutional economics: Тheory, method, policy. Boston; Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Tool M. R. (ed.) (1993). Institutional economics: Тheory, method, policy. Boston; Dordrecht; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Vandenberg P. (2002). North’s institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 217—235. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.2.217Vandenberg P. (2002). North’s institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 217—235. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/26.2.217Voigt S. (2013). How (not) to measure institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1—26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137412000148Voigt S. (2013). How (not) to measure institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1—26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137412000148Voigt S. (2019). Institutional economics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573719Voigt S. (2019). Institutional economics. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573719Waller W. (2020). The Journal of Economic Issues in the calculable future of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 329—333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1743140Waller W. (2020). The Journal of Economic Issues in the calculable future of original institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 329—333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1743140Whalen C. J. (2020). Post-Keynesian institutionalism: Рast, present, and future. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 71—92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-019-00150-4Whalen C. J. (2020). Post-Keynesian institutionalism: Рast, present, and future. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 71—92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-019-00150-4Whalen C. J. (2022). Storytelling and institutional change: The power and pitfalls of economic narratives. In: C. J. Whalen (ed.). Institutional economics perspectives and methods in pursuit of a better world. New York: Routledge, pp. 247—270. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003160434-13Whalen C. J. (2022). Storytelling and institutional change: The power and pitfalls of economic narratives. In: C. J. Whalen (ed.). Institutional economics perspectives and methods in pursuit of a better world. New York: Routledge, pp. 247—270. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003160434-13Wilber C. K., Harrison R. S. (1978). The methodological basis of institutional economics: Pattern model, storytelling, and holism. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 61—89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503505Wilber C. K., Harrison R. S. (1978). The methodological basis of institutional economics: Pattern model, storytelling, and holism. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 61—89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1978.11503505Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.Williamson O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: The Free Press.Williamson O. E. (1996). Economic evolution: An enquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics. Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1791—1793. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235224Williamson O. E. (1996). Economic evolution: An enquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics. Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1791—1793. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235224Williamson O. E. (2008). Foreword. In: E. Brousseau, J.-M. Glachant (eds.). New institutional economics: A guidebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xxiii- xxxvii.Williamson O. E. (2008). Foreword. In: E. Brousseau, J.-M. Glachant (eds.). New institutional economics: A guidebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xxiii- xxxvii.Wisman J. D., Rozansky J. (1991). The methodology of institutionalism revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 709—737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1991.11505198Wisman J. D., Rozansky J. (1991). The methodology of institutionalism revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 709—737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1991.11505198

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.