voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2022-11-90-116voprecotest-3698Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА ОТРАСЛЕВЫХ РЫНКОВINDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONВлияние отраслевых кластеров на результативность деятельности российских частных компаний: межотраслевой анализImpact of industry clusters on the performance of Russian private companies: Inter-industry analysishttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-8018ЗюзинА. В.ZyuzinA. V.

Зюзин Александр Владимирович , аспирант 

Москва

Alexander V. Zyuzin

Moscow

mr.a.zyuzin@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-3207ДемидоваО. А.DemidovaO. A.

Демидова Ольга Анатольевна, доктор экономических наук, доцент департамента прикладной экономики 

Москва

Olga A. Demidova

Moscow

demidova@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияHSE UniversityRussian Federation20220211202201190116Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20222022Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/3698

Изучается устойчивость влияния агломерационных экстерналий на результативность деятельности российских частных предприятий реального сектора в 2011—2018 гг. Агломерационные эффекты измеряются посредством оценки степени концентрации отрасли при помощи индекса Эллисона—Глейзера (высокая концентрация означает, что предприятия отрасли сосредоточены в одном или нескольких регионах). Эффект для предприятий измерялся через воздействие на валовую прибыль. Устойчивость эффекта концентрации проверялась при помощи линейных регрессионных моделей с учетом принадлежности предприятия к географическому кластеру для каждой из шести основных укрупненных групп отраслей предприятий: сельскохозяйственные отрасли, добыча полезных ископаемых, обрабатывающие отрасли, транспорт, информационные технологии и телекоммуникации, услуги. Устойчивые положительные агломерационные эффекты были найдены для сельскохозяйственных, добывающих и транспортных отраслей. Стабильно отрицательное воздействие повышенная степень концентрации отрасли оказывала на предприятия сферы услуг и обрабатывающей промышленности. Для предприятий сектора высоких технологий, входящих в отраслевой кластер, выяснилось, что повышение степени концентрации ведет к снижению результативности деятельности, а для компаний, располагающихся вне кластера, эффект концентрации 

This paper discovers the sustainability of agglomeration externalities and robustness issues for Russian private real sector companies between 2011 to 2018. Agglomeration effects are measured with the Ellison—Glaeser index (industry is supposed to be clustered in certain region(s) if the EG value is high). Firms’ sales margin was chosen as the main performance characteristic (dependent variable). The sample was divided into six aggregated groups (agriculture, mining, manufacturing, transport, IT, services). For each of them, sustainability and robustness of the concentration effect were checked using OLS estimates obtained for each year. Companies, located in and out of the cluster were studied separately. Strong, sustainable, and positive concentration effects were found for the agricultural, mining and transport industries. Sustainable negative agglomeration effects appear for the manufacturing and service industries. For IT companies located inside the industry cluster the agglomeration effect appeared to be negative and for those outside it — positive.

агломерацияотраслевой кластериндекс локализации Эллисона—Глейзерароссийские предприятияagglomerationindustry clusterEllison—Glaeser localization indexRussian enterprisesНИУ "Высшая Школа Экономики"ReferencesЗюзин А. В., Демидова О. А., Долгопятова Т. Г. (2020). Локализация и диверсификация российской экономики: региональные и отраслевые особенности // Пространственная экономика. Т. 16, № 2. С. 39—69. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.2.039-069Zyuzin A. V., Demidova O. A., Dolgopyatova T. G. (2020). Localization and diversification of Russian economy: Regions’ and industries’ peculiarities. Spatial Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 39—69. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2020.2.039-069Михайлова Т. Н. (2016). Трансформация географии промышленности Российской Федерации // Российское предпринимательство. Т. 17, № 3. С. 351—358. https://doi.org/10.18334/rp.17.3.2223Mikhailova T. N. (2016). Transformation of the industrial geography of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 351—358. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18334/rp.17.3.2223Aleksandrova E., Behrens K., Kuznetsova M. (2019). Manufacturing (Co) agglomeration in a transition country: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1—41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12436Aleksandrova E., Behrens K., Kuznetsova M. (2019). Manufacturing (Co) agglomeration in a transition country: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1—41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12436Audretsch D. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 18—29. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18 Audretsch D., Stephan P. (1996). Company-scientist location links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 641—652.Audretsch D. (1998). Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 18—29. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18 Audretsch D., Stephan P. (1996). Company-scientist location links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 641—652.Baptista R., Swann P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 525—540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1Baptista R., Swann P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp. 525—540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1Beaudry C., Breschi S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 325—342. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10438590290020197Beaudry C., Breschi S. (2003). Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 325—342. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10438590290020197Beaudry C., Schiffauerova A. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 318—337. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010Beaudry C., Schiffauerova A. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 318—337. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010Bell G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 287—295. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.448Bell G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 287—295. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.448Bessonova E., Gonchar K. (2017). Incentives to innovate in response to competition: The role of agency costs. Economic Systems, Vol. 41, pp. 26—40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.09.002Bessonova E., Gonchar K. (2017). Incentives to innovate in response to competition: The role of agency costs. Economic Systems, Vol. 41, pp. 26—40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.09.002Cassey A., Smith B. (2014). Simulating confidence for the Ellison—Glaeser index. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 81, pp. 85—103. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jue.2014.02.005Cassey A., Smith B. (2014). Simulating confidence for the Ellison—Glaeser index. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 81, pp. 85—103. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jue.2014.02.005Ciccone A. (2002). Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review, Vol. 46, pp. 213—227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00099-4Ciccone A. (2002). Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review, Vol. 46, pp. 213—227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00099-4Ciccone A., Hall R. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 54—70.Ciccone A., Hall R. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 54—70.Cohen J. P., Morrison Paul C. J. (2009). Agglomeration, productivity and regional growth: Production theory approaches. In: R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (eds.). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 101—117. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848445987.00013Cohen J. P., Morrison Paul C. J. (2009). Agglomeration, productivity and regional growth: Production theory approaches. In: R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (eds.). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 101—117. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848445987.00013Davidson N., Mariev O. (2015). The impact of spatial concentration on enterprise performance. Economy of Region, No. 4, pp. 95—105. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-4-8Davidson N., Mariev O. (2015). The impact of spatial concentration on enterprise performance. Economy of Region, No. 4, pp. 95—105. https://doi.org/10.17059/2015-4-8Ellison G., Glaeser E. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 5, pp. 889—927. https://doi.org/10.1086/262098Ellison G., Glaeser E. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, No. 5, pp. 889—927. https://doi.org/10.1086/262098Feser E. J. (2000). On the Ellison—Glaeser geographic concentration index. Unpublished manuscript.Feser E. J. (2000). On the Ellison—Glaeser geographic concentration index. Unpublished manuscript.Fischer M., Scherngell T., Jansenberger E. (2006). The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe: Evidence from a spatial interaction modeling perspective. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 38, pp. 288—309. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2006.00687.xFischer M., Scherngell T., Jansenberger E. (2006). The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe: Evidence from a spatial interaction modeling perspective. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 38, pp. 288—309. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.2006.00687.xGonchar K. (2010). Urban agglomeration effects and company productivity in Russia: Empirical evidence based on manufacturing industry survey. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK, June 17—19.Gonchar K. (2010). Urban agglomeration effects and company productivity in Russia: Empirical evidence based on manufacturing industry survey. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK, June 17—19.Hervas-Oliver J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll F., Alvarado R., Estelles-Miguel S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: Who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 338—349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1297895Hervas-Oliver J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll F., Alvarado R., Estelles-Miguel S. (2018). Agglomerations and firm performance: Who benefits and how much? Regional Studies, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 338—349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1297895Holmes T. (1999). Localization of industry and vertical disintegration. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 314—325. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465399558102Holmes T. (1999). Localization of industry and vertical disintegration. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 314—325. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465399558102Huang Y., Hong T., Ma T. (2020). Urban network externalities, agglomeration economies and urban economic growth. International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, Vol. 107, pp. 1—15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102882Huang Y., Hong T., Ma T. (2020). Urban network externalities, agglomeration economies and urban economic growth. International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, Vol. 107, pp. 1—15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102882Jacobs J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Jacobs J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Ketels C., Protsiv S. (2021). Cluster presence and economic performance: A new look based on European data. Regional Studies, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 208—220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1792435Ketels C., Protsiv S. (2021). Cluster presence and economic performance: A new look based on European data. Regional Studies, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 208—220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1792435Knoben J., Arikan A.T., van Oort F., Raspe O. (2016). Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 132—153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15602898Knoben J., Arikan A.T., van Oort F., Raspe O. (2016). Agglomeration and firm performance: One firm’s medicine is another firm’s poison. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 132—153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15602898Li D., Lu Y., Wu M. (2012). Industrial agglomeration and firm size: Evidence from China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 42, pp. 135—143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.07.003Li D., Lu Y., Wu M. (2012). Industrial agglomeration and firm size: Evidence from China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 42, pp. 135—143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.07.003Lu Y., Tao Z., Yu L. (2012). Agglomeration and markup. MPRA Paper, No. 38974. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2065303Lu Y., Tao Z., Yu L. (2012). Agglomeration and markup. MPRA Paper, No. 38974. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2065303Malmberg A., Malmberg B., Lundequist P. (2000). Agglomeration and firm performance: Economies of scale, localization, and urbanization among Swedish export firms. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 305—321. https://doi.org/10.1068/a31202Malmberg A., Malmberg B., Lundequist P. (2000). Agglomeration and firm performance: Economies of scale, localization, and urbanization among Swedish export firms. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 305—321. https://doi.org/10.1068/a31202Marshall A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan and Co.Marshall A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan and Co.Martin P., Mayer T., Mayneris F. (2011). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 182—195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002Martin P., Mayer T., Mayneris F. (2011). Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 182—195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002McCann P., van Oort F. (2019). Theories of agglomeration and regional economic growth: A historical review. In: R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (eds.). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 6—23. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970020McCann P., van Oort F. (2019). Theories of agglomeration and regional economic growth: A historical review. In: R. Capello, P. Nijkamp (eds.). Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 6—23. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970020Quigley J. M. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 127—138. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.2.127Quigley J. M. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 127—138. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.2.127Rosenthal S. S., Strange W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: J. V. Henderson, J. Thisse (eds.). Handbook of regional and urban economics: Cities and geography, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2119—2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3Rosenthal S. S., Strange W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: J. V. Henderson, J. Thisse (eds.). Handbook of regional and urban economics: Cities and geography, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2119—2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3Rosenthal S. S., Strange W. C. (2006). The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies. In: R. J. Arnott, D. P. McMillen (eds.). A companion to urban economics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 7—23. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996225.Rosenthal S. S., Strange W. C. (2006). The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies. In: R. J. Arnott, D. P. McMillen (eds.). A companion to urban economics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 7—23. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996225.Skhvediani A., Sosnovskikh S. (2020). What agglomeration externalities impact the development of the hi-tech industry sector? Evidence from the Russian regions. International Journal of Technology, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1091—1102. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i6.4423Skhvediani A., Sosnovskikh S. (2020). What agglomeration externalities impact the development of the hi-tech industry sector? Evidence from the Russian regions. International Journal of Technology, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 1091—1102. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i6.4423Zyuzin A. (2021). Cross-industry analysis of Russian enterprise performance: Do concentration and diversification matter? Economic Policy, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 42—83. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-4-42-83Zyuzin A. (2021). Cross-industry analysis of Russian enterprise performance: Do concentration and diversification matter? Economic Policy, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 42—83. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-4-42-83

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.