voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-140-147voprecotest-354Research ArticleНАУЧНЫЕ СООБЩЕНИЯRESEARCH NOTESЭра Азии на фоне евро-атлантической цивилизации?An Asian era with the Euro-Atlantic civilization as a background?КолодкоГ. В.KolodkoG. W.

проф., директор TIGER — Transformation, Integration and Globalization Economic Research, Университет Козьминского (Варшава, Польша)

kolodko@tiger.edu.plTIGER - Transformation, Integration and Globalization Economic Research, Университет КозьминскогоПольшаTIGER - Transformation, Integration and Globalization Economic Research, Kozminski UniversityPoland201720102017010140147Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20172017Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/354

В течение многих лет утверждалось, что в мире наступает век Азии, а позиции Европы и Соединенных Штатов будут ослабевать. Главным фактором этих тектонических сдвигов в относительной экономической мощи и соответствующей геополитической ситуации выступает почти 40-летний рост китайской экономики. Важны достижения и других быстрорастущих стран Юго-Восточной Азии, особенно Индии. Для проверки справедливости этих утверждений проанализированы различные аспекты противостояния Китая и Европы и Северной Америки. Эра доминирования Азии не наступает, но позиции Востока относительно усиливаются за счет ослабления позиций Запада. Как следствие, возникает новая многополярная структура сил в глобальной экономике, в которой не будет одного лидера.

For years, the view has been repeated that Asia’s age is coming, and thus the position of both Europe and the United States is declining. The main factor behind these tectonic shifts in relative economic power and the associated geopolitical situation is the nearly four decades of rapid growth of Chinese economy. The achievements of other Southeast Asian countries, especially India, with robust growth are also meaningful with this regard. The article verifies these views and analyzes the different aspects of China’s confrontation with Europe and North America. The Asian dominance era is not coming, yet a relatively stronger position of the East at the cost of a weakening position of the West is emerging. Hence, a new multi-polar arrangement of forces in the global economy, without a hegemon, is being created.

экономический ростглобализацияэкономическая мощьгеополитическая ситуациядоминирование АзииКитайЕвропаСШАeconomic growthglobalizationeconomic powergeopolitical situationAsian dominanceChinaEuropeUnited StatesReferencesHalper S. (2010). The Beijing consensus: How China’s authoritarian model will dominate the twentyfirst century. New York: Basic BooksHalper S. (2010). The Beijing consensus: How China’s authoritarian model will dominate the twentyfirst century. New York: Basic BooksKolodko G. W. (1999). Transition to a market economy and sustained growth. Implications for the post-Washington consensus. Communist and PostCommunist Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 233-261.Kolodko G. W. (1999). Transition to a market economy and sustained growth. Implications for the post-Washington consensus. Communist and PostCommunist Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 233-261.Kolodko G. W. (2011). Truth, errors, and lies: Politics and economics in a volatile world. New York: Columbia University Press.Kolodko G. W. (2011). Truth, errors, and lies: Politics and economics in a volatile world. New York: Columbia University Press.Kolodko G. W. (2014). Whither the world: The political economy of the future. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Kolodko G. W. (2014). Whither the world: The political economy of the future. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Kupchan Ch. A. (2012). No one’s world. The West, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. New York: Oxford University Press.Kupchan Ch. A. (2012). No one’s world. The West, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. New York: Oxford University Press.Lin J. Y. (2011). Demystifying the Chinese economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Lin J. Y. (2011). Demystifying the Chinese economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Lin J. Y. (2013). Against the consensus. Reflections on the Great Recession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Lin J. Y. (2013). Against the consensus. Reflections on the Great Recession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.McGregor J. (2012). No ancient wisdom, no followers: The challenges of Chinese authoritarian capitalism. Westport, CT: Prospecta Press.McGregor J. (2012). No ancient wisdom, no followers: The challenges of Chinese authoritarian capitalism. Westport, CT: Prospecta Press.Mishra P. (2012). From the ruins of empire: The revolt against the West and the remaking of Asia. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Mishra P. (2012). From the ruins of empire: The revolt against the West and the remaking of Asia. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Spence M. (2011). The next convergence. The future of economic growth in a multispeed world. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Spence M. (2011). The next convergence. The future of economic growth in a multispeed world. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Stiglitz J. E. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the postWashington consensus (WIDER Annual Lecture 2). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.Stiglitz J. E. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the postWashington consensus (WIDER Annual Lecture 2). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.Subramanian A., Kessler M. (2012). The Renminbi bloc is here: Asia down, rest of the world to go? (Working Paper No. 12-19). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Subramanian A., Kessler M. (2012). The Renminbi bloc is here: Asia down, rest of the world to go? (Working Paper No. 12-19). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Vohra R. (1999). China’s path to modernization: A historical review from 1800 to the present. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Vohra R. (1999). China’s path to modernization: A historical review from 1800 to the present. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Williamson J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In: J. Williamson (ed.). Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Williamson J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In: J. Williamson (ed.). Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.