voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2020-9-94-119voprecotest-3037Research ArticleИСТОРИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ МЫСЛИHISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHTПроблемы и перспективы развития истории экономической мысли: взгляд российских и зарубежных ученыхWhither history of economic thought: A perspective from Russian and international scholarshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-5120МальцевА. А.MaltsevA. A.

Мальцев Александр Андреевич, д. э. н., доцент, вед. н. с. ИЭ УрО РАН (Екатеринбург, Россия); докторант Университета Пикардии имени Жюля Верна (Амьен, Франция)

SPIN-код: 5002-0128

Alexander A. Maltsev

almalzev@mail.ruИнститут экономики УрО РАН; Университет Пикардии имени Жюля ВернаРоссияInstitute of Economics, RAS (Ural Branch) (Ekaterinburg, Russia); University of Picardie Jules Verne (Amiens, France)Russian Federation2020040920200994119Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20202020Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/3037

На основе результатов опроса 53 российских и 170 зарубежных специалистов рассматриваются проблемы и перспективы развития истории экономической мысли (ИЭМ). Проведенное исследование показало, что расширение набора исследовательских методов, сдвиг в сторону изучения истории экономической науки XX в. в сочетании со сближением ИЭМ с другими социальными науками повысили ее привлекательность среди молодых исследователей. Это снимает остроту проблемы старения кадров и позволяет с относительным оптимизмом смотреть в будущее ИЭМ, постепенно превращающуюся в исследовательскую площадку, которая объединяет исследователей, представляющих широкий спектр дисциплин. На фоне выделенных тенденций анализируются теоретико-методологические и институциональные особенности российского сообщества историков экономической мысли. Проведенный анализ позволяет говорить, что российские ученые в области ИЭМ имеют гораздо больше общего, чем различного, с представителями соответствующего международного сообщества.

The article examines the problems and prospects of the history of economic thought (HET) based on a survey of 53 Russian and 170 international scholars. It has been demonstrated that the expansion of the range of historiographic methods, growing interest of the HET community towards the history of the 20th century economics as well as growing cooperation of historians of economic thought with the scholars from different social sciences and humanities have increased the attractiveness of the HET field among young researchers. These developments help to reduce the problem of the HET community’s aging and allows to look ahead to the future of the HET in a positive way. Against the background of these trends, theoretical, methodological and institutional features of the Russian community of historians of economic thought are analyzed. The analysis reveals that the members of the Russian community have more in common with their international colleagues than fundamental differences.

история экономических ученийэкономическая методологиясоциология экономической наукиhistory of economic thoughtmethodologysociology of economicsСтатья подготовлена при поддержке гранта Президента РФ № МД-59.2019.6.The article was prepared with the support of the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation for the Young Scholars (Research Project No. MD-59.2019.6).ReferencesАвтономов В. С. (2013). Владимир Автономов: Учителя // Поколения ВШЭ. Учителя об учителях. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ. С. 80—84.Avtonomov V. S. (2013). Vladimir Avtonomov: Teachers. In: HSE generations. Teachers about teachers. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 80—84. (In Russian).Ананьин О. И. (2013). Олег Ананьин: Учителя // Поколения ВШЭ. Учителя об учителях. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ. C. 253—259.Ananyin O. I. (2013). Oleg Ananyin: Teachers. In: HSE generations. Teachers about teachers. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 253—259. (In Russian).Баженов Г. А., Мальцев А. А. (2018). Современные гетеродоксальные направления экономической теории в контексте трансформации мейнстрима // Общество и экономика. № 1. С. 5—21.Bazhenov G. A., Maltsev A. A. (2018). Modern heterodox approaches in the context of the transformation of mainstream economics . Obshchestvo i Еkonomika, No. 1, pp. 5—21. (In Russian).Болдырев И. (2019). История современной экономической науки // Postnauka.ru, 11 ноября. https://postnauka.ru/video/103535Boldyrev I. (2019). History of modern economics. Postnauka.ru, November 11. (In Russian). https://postnauka.ru/video/103535Жамин В. А., Кузьминов Я. И. (1989). Историко-экономическая наука в СССР: история, современное положение, проблемы перестройки // Жамин В. А., Баранов А. А., Кузьминов Я. И. и др. (ред.). Истоки: вопросы истории народного хозяйства и экономической мысли. Вып. 1. М.: Экономика. C. 6—24.Zhamin V. A., Kuzminov Y. I. (1989). Economic historical science in the USSR: History, current situation, problems of perestroika. In: V. A. Zhamin, A. A. Baranov, Y. I. Kuzminov et al. (eds.). Origins: Questions of the history of the national economy and economic thought, Iss. 1. Moscow: Ekonomika, pp. 6—24. (In Russian).Кузьминов Я. И. (1998). Возвращение к «Истокам». О теоретическом запасе сообщества российских экономистов // Кузьминов Я. И., Автономов В. С., Ананьин О. И. (ред.). Истоки: вопросы истории народного хозяйства и экономической мысли. Вып. 3. М.: ГУ ВШЭ. С. 3—22.Kuzminov Y. I. (1998). Back to the “Origins”. On the theoretical stock of the community of Russian economists. In: Y. I. Kuzminov, V. S. Avtonomov, O. I. Ananyin (eds.). Origins: Questions of the history of the national economy and economic thought, Iss. 3. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 3—22. (In Russian).Макашева Н. А. (2007). Экономическая наука в России в период трансформации (конец 1980-х — начало 1990-х гг.): революция и рост научного знания // Кузьминов Я. И., Автономов В. С., Ананьин О. И. (ред.). Истоки: из опыта изучения экономики как структуры и процесса. М.: Изд. дом ГУ ВШЭ. С. 400—428.Makasheva N. A. (2007). Economics in Russia during the transformation period (late 1980s — early 1990s): Revolution and the growth of scientific knowledge. In: Y. I. Kuzminov, V. S. Avtonomov, O. I. Ananyin (eds.). Origins: From the experience of studying economics as a structure and process. Moscow: HSE Publ., pp. 400—428. (In Russian).Мальцев А. А. (2015). История экономических учений, Quo vadis? // Вопросы экономики. № 3. С. 126—150. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-3-126-150Maltsev A. (2015). History of economic thought, Quo vadis? Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 3, pp. 126—150. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-3-126-150Мальцев А. (2016). Российское сообщество экономистов: особенности и перспективы // Вопросы экономики. № 11. С. 135—158. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-135-158Maltsev A. (2016). Russian community of economists: Main features and perspectives. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 135—158. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-135-158Мальцев А. А. (2018). Гетеродоксальная экономическая теория: текущее состояние и пути дальнейшего развития // Экономическая политика. Т. 13, № 2. С. 148—169. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-2-08Maltsev A. A. (2018). Heterodox economic theory: Сurrent status and ways of further development. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 148—169. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2018-2-08Мальцев А. А., Баженов Г. А. (2016). Теоретико-методологическая архитектура российского сообщества академических экономистов // Известия УрГЭУ. № 6. С. 13—22.Maltsev A. A., Bazhenov G. A. (2016). Theoretical and methodological architecture of the Russian society of academic economists. Izvestiya UrGЕU, No. 6, 13—22. (In Russian).Мальцев А. А., Неновски Н. Н. (2019). О Первой октябрьской Международной конференции по проблемам теоретической экономики // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 4. С. 261—264.Maltsev A. A., Nenovsky N. N. (2019). About the First October international conference on theoretical economics. Journal of the New Economic Association, Vol. 4, pp. 261—264. (In Russian).Черкасов П. П. (2016). ИМЭМО: очерк истории. М.: Весь мир. [Cherkasov P. P. (2016). IMEMO: An outline of history. Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russian).Черкасов П. П. (2016). ИМЭМО: очерк истории. М.: Весь мир. [Cherkasov P. P. (2016). IMEMO: An outline of history. Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russian).Anderson R. G. (2019). Introduction. In: R. A. Cord, R. G. Anderson, W. A. Barnett (eds.). Paul Samuelson: Master of modern economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56812-0Anderson R. G. (2019). Introduction. In: R. A. Cord, R. G. Anderson, W. A. Barnett (eds.). Paul Samuelson: Master of modern economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56812-0Baccini A. (2020). A bibliometric portrait of contemporary history of economic thought. In: M. C. Marcuzzo, G. Deleplace, P. Paesani (eds.). New perspectives on political economy and its history. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39—63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42925-6Baccini A. (2020). A bibliometric portrait of contemporary history of economic thought. In: M. C. Marcuzzo, G. Deleplace, P. Paesani (eds.). New perspectives on political economy and its history. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39—63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42925-6Backhouse R. E. (2002). The future of the history of economic thought in Britain. History of Political Economy, Vol. 34, Annual Supplement, pp. 79—97. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-Suppl_1-79Backhouse R. E. (2002). The future of the history of economic thought in Britain. History of Political Economy, Vol. 34, Annual Supplement, pp. 79—97. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-Suppl_1-79Backhouse R.E., Fontaine P. (2014). Contested identities. In: R. E. Backhouse, P. Fontaine (eds.). A historiography of the modern social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183—210. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139794817Backhouse R.E., Fontaine P. (2014). Contested identities. In: R. E. Backhouse, P. Fontaine (eds.). A historiography of the modern social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183—210. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139794817Balabkins N. (2005). Russian economic thought and its debilitating legacy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 207—214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500114277Balabkins N. (2005). Russian economic thought and its debilitating legacy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 207—214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570500114277Bianchi A.-M. (2018). Challenges of doing research in the history of economic thought: a Latin American perspective. Estudos Econômicos, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 215—228. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614821ambBianchi A.-M. (2018). Challenges of doing research in the history of economic thought: a Latin American perspective. Estudos Econômicos, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 215—228. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614821ambBiddle J. E. (2003). Research styles in the history of economic thought. In: W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, J. B. Davis (eds.). A companion to the history of economic thought. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999059Biddle J. E. (2003). Research styles in the history of economic thought. In: W. J. Samuels, J. E. Biddle, J. B. Davis (eds.). A companion to the history of economic thought. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999059Blaug M. (1997). Economic theory in retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Blaug M. (1997). Economic theory in retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bögenhold D. (2020). History of economic thought as an analytic tool: Why past intellectual ideas must be acknowledged as lighthouses for the future. International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 26, pp. 73—87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-020-09775-3Bögenhold D. (2020). History of economic thought as an analytic tool: Why past intellectual ideas must be acknowledged as lighthouses for the future. International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 26, pp. 73—87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-020-09775-3Boldyrev I. (2017). The Origins: “History of economics” and history of economics in Russia. History of Economics Playground Redux, December 4. https://historyofeconomics.wordpress.com/Boldyrev I. (2017). The Origins: “History of economics” and history of economics in Russia. History of Economics Playground Redux, December 4. https://historyofeconomics.wordpress.com/Boldyrev I., Kirtchik O. (2017). The cultures of mathematical economics in the postwar Soviet Union: More than a method, less than a discipline. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, Vol. 63, pp. 1—10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.011Boldyrev I., Kirtchik O. (2017). The cultures of mathematical economics in the postwar Soviet Union: More than a method, less than a discipline. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, Vol. 63, pp. 1—10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.011Chassonnery-Zaïgouche C., Herfeld C., Pinzón-Fuchs E. (2018). New scope, new sources, new methods? An essay on contemporary scholarship in history of economic thought journals, 2016—2017. CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2018-07.Chassonnery-Zaïgouche C., Herfeld C., Pinzón-Fuchs E. (2018). New scope, new sources, new methods? An essay on contemporary scholarship in history of economic thought journals, 2016—2017. CHOPE Working Paper, No. 2018-07.Cherrier B. (2015). Is there a quantitative turn in the history of economics (and how not to screw it up)? Beatrice Cherrier’s blog, June 23. https://beatricecherrier.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/is-there-a-quantitative-turn-in-the-history-of-economics-and-how-not-to-screw-it-up/Cherrier B. (2015). Is there a quantitative turn in the history of economics (and how not to screw it up)? Beatrice Cherrier’s blog, June 23. https://beatricecherrier.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/is-there-a-quantitative-turn-in-the-history-of-economics-and-how-not-to-screw-it-up/Cherrier B., Svorenčík A. (2018). The quantitative turn in the history of economics: Рromises, perils and challenges. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 367—377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529217Cherrier B., Svorenčík A. (2018). The quantitative turn in the history of economics: Рromises, perils and challenges. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 367—377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529217Coats A. W. B. (2014). Research priorities in the history of economics. In: R. E. Backhouse, B. Caldwell (eds.). The historiography of economics: British and American economic essays. The collected papers of A. W. Coats, Vol. III. London, New York: Routledge. P. 167—175. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796573Coats A. W. B. (2014). Research priorities in the history of economics. In: R. E. Backhouse, B. Caldwell (eds.). The historiography of economics: British and American economic essays. The collected papers of A. W. Coats, Vol. III. London, New York: Routledge. P. 167—175. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796573Cohen J. S. (1978). The achievements of economic history: Тhe Marxist school. The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 29—57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002205070008815XCohen J. S. (1978). The achievements of economic history: Тhe Marxist school. The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 29—57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002205070008815XColander D. (2007). The making of an economist, redux. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Colander D. (2007). The making of an economist, redux. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Duarte P. G., Hurtado J. (2019). JHET interview series: An editorial introduction. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, pp. 593—598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837219000403Duarte P. G., Hurtado J. (2019). JHET interview series: An editorial introduction. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, pp. 593—598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837219000403Edwards J. (2020). Fifty years of HOPE: Changing priorities in the historiography of economics. History of Political Economy, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1—46. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8009485Edwards J. (2020). Fifty years of HOPE: Changing priorities in the historiography of economics. History of Political Economy, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1—46. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8009485Edwards J., Giraud Y., Schinckus C. (2018). A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 283—290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529133Edwards J., Giraud Y., Schinckus C. (2018). A quantitative turn in the historiography of economics? Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 283—290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1529133Emmett R. (2009). Frank Knight and the Chicago school in American economics. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881743Emmett R. (2009). Frank Knight and the Chicago school in American economics. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881743Flatau P., Leeson R. (2001). Ray Petridis, HETSA and the revival of the history of economic thought. History of Economic Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2001.11733354Flatau P., Leeson R. (2001). Ray Petridis, HETSA and the revival of the history of economic thought. History of Economic Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10370196.2001.11733354Frey B. S., Humbert S., Schneider F. (2010). What is economics? Attitudes and views of German economists. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 317—332. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492610Frey B. S., Humbert S., Schneider F. (2010). What is economics? Attitudes and views of German economists. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 317—332. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1492610Gingras Y., Schinckus C. (2012). The institutionalization of econophysics in the shadow of physics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 109—130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837212000041Gingras Y., Schinckus C. (2012). The institutionalization of econophysics in the shadow of physics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 109—130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837212000041Giraud Y. (2019). Fife decades of HOPE. History of Political Economy, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 601—669. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7685173Giraud Y. (2019). Fife decades of HOPE. History of Political Economy, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 601—669. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7685173Goodspeed T. B. (2012). Rethinking the Keynesian revolution: Keynes, Hayek, and the Wicksell connection. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199846658.001.0001Goodspeed T. B. (2012). Rethinking the Keynesian revolution: Keynes, Hayek, and the Wicksell connection. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199846658.001.0001Guizzo D. (2020). Why does the history of thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics? Review of Keynesian Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 119—137. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09Guizzo D. (2020). Why does the history of thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics? Review of Keynesian Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 119—137. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09Heilbroner R.L. (1980). Modern economics as a chapter in the history of economic thought. Challenge, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 20—24. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.1980.11470575Heilbroner R.L. (1980). Modern economics as a chapter in the history of economic thought. Challenge, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 20—24. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.1980.11470575Kurz H. D. (2006). Whither the history of economic thought? Going nowhere rather slowly? The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 463—488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560601063929Kurz H. D. (2006). Whither the history of economic thought? Going nowhere rather slowly? The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 463—488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672560601063929Libman A., Zweynert J. (2014). Ceremonial science: The state of Russian economics seen through the lens of the work of “Doctor of science” candidates. Economic Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 360—378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2013.11.001Libman A., Zweynert J. (2014). Ceremonial science: The state of Russian economics seen through the lens of the work of “Doctor of science” candidates. Economic Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 360—378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2013.11.001Lodewijks J. (2001). Row Weintraub’s contribution to the history of economics. In: S. G. Medema, W. J. Samuels (eds.). Historians of economics and economic thought. The construction of disciplinary memory. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, pp. 320—334.Lodewijks J. (2001). Row Weintraub’s contribution to the history of economics. In: S. G. Medema, W. J. Samuels (eds.). Historians of economics and economic thought. The construction of disciplinary memory. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, pp. 320—334.Maas H. (2013). A 2 X 2 = 4 hobby horse: Mark Blaug on rational and historical reconstructions. In: M. Boumans, M. Klaes (eds.). Mark Blaug: Rebel with many causes. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 125—146.Maas H. (2013). A 2 X 2 = 4 hobby horse: Mark Blaug on rational and historical reconstructions. In: M. Boumans, M. Klaes (eds.). Mark Blaug: Rebel with many causes. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 125—146.Maas H. (2018). The method of the witness seminar. History of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 571—577. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7023506Maas H. (2018). The method of the witness seminar. History of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 571—577. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7023506Marcuzzo M. C., Zacchia G. (2016). Is history of economics what historians of economic thought do? A quantitative investigation. History of Economic Ideas, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 29—46. http://dx.medra.org/10.19272/201606103002Marcuzzo M. C., Zacchia G. (2016). Is history of economics what historians of economic thought do? A quantitative investigation. History of Economic Ideas, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 29—46. http://dx.medra.org/10.19272/201606103002Negishi T. (1992). Comment. History of Political Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 227—229. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-24-1-227Negishi T. (1992). Comment. History of Political Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 227—229. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-24-1-227Osipian A. L. (2004). Teaching economics in the former Soviet Union: New curriculum, old instruction? Paper presented at the International conference “75 years of development research” at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, May. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500029.pdfOsipian A. L. (2004). Teaching economics in the former Soviet Union: New curriculum, old instruction? Paper presented at the International conference “75 years of development research” at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, May. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500029.pdfPatinkin D. (1992). Comment. History of Political Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 230—233. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-24-1-230Patinkin D. (1992). Comment. History of Political Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 230—233. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-24-1-230Reinert S.A. (2018). Historical political economy. In: I. Cardinale, R. Scazzieri (eds.). The Palgrave handbook of political economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133—171. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44254-3Reinert S.A. (2018). Historical political economy. In: I. Cardinale, R. Scazzieri (eds.). The Palgrave handbook of political economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 133—171. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44254-3Rosselli A. (2013). Economic history and history of economics: In praise of an old relationship. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 865—881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2013.838979Rosselli A. (2013). Economic history and history of economics: In praise of an old relationship. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 865—881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2013.838979Samuels W. J., Johnson K. D., Johnson M. (2004). What the authors of history of economic thought textbooks say about the history of economic thought. In: W. J. Samuels, W. Henderson, K. D. Johnson, M. Johnson. Essays in the history of economics. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 187—271. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799987Samuels W. J., Johnson K. D., Johnson M. (2004). What the authors of history of economic thought textbooks say about the history of economic thought. In: W. J. Samuels, W. Henderson, K. D. Johnson, M. Johnson. Essays in the history of economics. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 187—271. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799987Schabas M. (1992). Breaking away: History of economics as history of science. History of Political Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 187—203. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-24-1-187Schabas M. (1992). Breaking away: History of economics as history of science. History of Political Economy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 187—203. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-24-1-187Schabas M. (2002). Coming together: History of economics as history of science. History of Political Economy, Vol. 34, Supplement, pp. 208—225. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-Suppl_1-208Schabas M. (2002). Coming together: History of economics as history of science. History of Political Economy, Vol. 34, Supplement, pp. 208—225. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-Suppl_1-208Shiller R. J. (2010). How should the financial crisis change how we teach economics? The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 403—409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2010.510409Shiller R. J. (2010). How should the financial crisis change how we teach economics? The Journal of Economic Education, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 403—409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2010.510409Shirokorad L.D., Zweynert J. (2012). Izrail G. Blyumin — the fate of a Soviet historian of economic thought under Stalin. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 653—677. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2011.565353Shirokorad L.D., Zweynert J. (2012). Izrail G. Blyumin — the fate of a Soviet historian of economic thought under Stalin. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 653—677. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2011.565353Simon T. W. (1990). Artificial methodology meets philosophy. In: D. Partridge, Y. Wilks (eds.). The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 155—165.Simon T. W. (1990). Artificial methodology meets philosophy. In: D. Partridge, Y. Wilks (eds.). The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 155—165.Stigler G.J. (1969). Does economics have a useful past? History of Political Economy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 217—230. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1-2-217Stigler G.J. (1969). Does economics have a useful past? History of Political Economy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 217—230. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1-2-217Svorenčík A. (2014). MIT’s rise to prominence: Outline of a collective biography. History of Political Economy, Vol. 46, Supplement 1, pp. 109—133. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2716136Svorenčík A. (2014). MIT’s rise to prominence: Outline of a collective biography. History of Political Economy, Vol. 46, Supplement 1, pp. 109—133. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2716136Svorenčík A., Maas H. (ed.). (2016). The making of experimental economics: Witness seminar of the emergence of a field. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20952-4Svorenčík A., Maas H. (ed.). (2016). The making of experimental economics: Witness seminar of the emergence of a field. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20952-4Trautwein H.-M. (2017). The last generalists. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 1134—1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2017.1378694Trautwein H.-M. (2017). The last generalists. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 1134—1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2017.1378694van Dalen H. (2019). Values of economists’ matter in the art and science of economics. Kyklos, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 472—499. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12208van Dalen H. (2019). Values of economists’ matter in the art and science of economics. Kyklos, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 472—499. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12208Warsh D. (2011). Past and present. Economic Principals, January 10. http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2011.01.10/1220.htmlWarsh D. (2011). Past and present. Economic Principals, January 10. http://www.economicprincipals.com/issues/2011.01.10/1220.htmlWasmer E., Mayer T. (2009). Y-a-t-il du consensus entre économistes en France? MPRA Paper, No. 18584. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18584/Wasmer E., Mayer T. (2009). Y-a-t-il du consensus entre économistes en France? MPRA Paper, No. 18584. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18584/Weintraub E. R. (2002). Will economics ever have a past again? History of Political Economy, Vol. 3, Annual Supplement, pp. 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-Suppl_1-1Weintraub E. R. (2002). Will economics ever have a past again? History of Political Economy, Vol. 3, Annual Supplement, pp. 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-Suppl_1-1Weintraub E. R. (2007). Economic science wars. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 267—282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710701514679Weintraub E. R. (2007). Economic science wars. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 267—282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427710701514679Weintraub E. R. (2019). Introduction. In: E. R. Weintraub, T. Düppe (ed.). A contemporary historiography of economics. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 1—7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169194Weintraub E. R. (2019). Introduction. In: E. R. Weintraub, T. Düppe (ed.). A contemporary historiography of economics. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 1—7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169194Winch D. (2017). Intellectual history and the history of economic thought: A personal account. Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, Vol. 6, No. 12, Item 6, Section 3, pp. 3—18.Winch D. (2017). Intellectual history and the history of economic thought: A personal account. Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, Vol. 6, No. 12, Item 6, Section 3, pp. 3—18.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.