<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-135-149</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-2978</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>РАЗМЫШЛЕНИЯ НАД КНИГОЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REFLECTIONS ON THE BOOK</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Необычный социолог Джеффри Ингем и два незнакомых знаменитых экономиста (О книге Дж. Ингема «Money. Ideology, history, politics»)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>An unusual sociologist Geoffrey Ingham, and two unknown famous economists (On the book “Money. Ideology, history, politics” by G. Ingham)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ефимов</surname><given-names>В. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yefimov</surname><given-names>V. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Eфимов Владимир Максович, д. э. н.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vladimir M. Yefimov</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">vladimir.yefimov@wanadoo.fr</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Независимый исследователь</institution><country>Франция</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Independent researcher</institution><country>France</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2978">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2978</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются эпизоды трехвекового противостояния счетно-долговой институциональной теории и товарной теории денег. Первая обсуждается редко, ей, в частности, посвящена книга Дж. Ингема. Товарная теория денег продолжает доминировать в университетских учебниках. В статье на примере судьбы двух книг Дж. М. Кейнса и Й. Шумпетера анализируется, чем это обусловлено. Показана связь двух теорий денег с противоположными методологическими подходами: априорно-абстрактным, основанным на предпосылках, и историко-экспериментальным, основанным на фактах. Первый был обозначен Дж. С. Миллем, когда только началась институционализация профессии академического экономиста, и продолжает доминировать в этой профессии до сих пор. Второй получил развитие в немецкой историко-этической школе, возглавляемой Г. Шмоллером, и в сообществе американского исходного институционализма, наиболее последовательными представителями которого были Дж. Коммонс и его ученики.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with the episodes in the three-century confrontation between the account-debt institutional and the commodity theory of money. The former is rarely discussed; and the ideas of G. Ingham can be considered as a such modern episode. The commodity theory of money continues to dominate in university textbooks. The article analyzes the fate of two books by J. M. Keynes and J. Schumpeter as an example. It shows the connection of the two theories of money with two opposite methodological approaches, namely, a priori-abstract, based on assumptions, and historical-experimental, based on facts. The first of these was clearly identified by J. S. Mill at the beginning of the institutionalization of the academic/university economist profession and continues to dominate this profession to this day. The second was developed in the German historico-ethical school headed by G. Schmoller and in the community of American original institutionalism, the most consistent representatives of which were J. Commons and his students.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>деньги</kwd><kwd>счетно-долговая институциональная теория денег</kwd><kwd>товарная теория денег</kwd><kwd>Дж. Ингем</kwd><kwd>Дж. М. Кейнс</kwd><kwd>Й. Шумпетер</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>money</kwd><kwd>account-debt institutional theory of money</kwd><kwd>commodity theory of money</kwd><kwd>G. Ingham</kwd><kwd>J. M. Keynes</kwd><kwd>J. Schumpeter</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аммус С. (2019). Краткая история денег, или Все, что нужно знать о биткоине. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ammous S. (2019). A brief history of money, or Everything you need to know about bitcoin. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белянова А.М., Гудкова Т.В. (2013). Наследие Й. Шумпетера и проблемы экономического развития России // Вестник Московского университета, серия Экономика. Т. 6, № 2. С. 85—112.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belyanova A.M., Gudkova T. V. (2013). J. Schumpeter’s legacy and problems of economic development in Russia. Bulletin of the Moscow University, Economics series, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 85—112. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гребер Д. (2015). Долг: первые 5000 лет истории. М.: Ад. Маргинем Пресс.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graeber D. (2015). Debt: The first 5000 years of history. Moscow: Ad. Marginem Press. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Джевонс У. С. (2011). Основы науки. Трактат о логике и научном методе. М.: Книжный дом «Либроком».</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jevons W. S. (2011). Foundations of the science. A treatise on logic and scientific method. Moscow: Book house “Librokom”. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2015). К реформе экономического образования // Эксперт Урал. № 17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2015). To the reform of economic education. Expert Ural, No. 17. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2016a). Экономическая наука под вопросом: иная методология, история и исследовательские практики. М.: Курс, ИНФРА-М.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2016a). Economic science in question: Other methodology, history and research practices. Moscow: Kurs, INFRA-M. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2016b). Прошлое и будущее экономической науки с точки зрения прагма тистской философии // Журнал экономической теории. № 3. С. 50—63.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2016b). Past and future of economic science from the point of view of pragmatist philosophy. Journal of Economic Theory, No. 3, pp. 50—63. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. (2017). Конец алхимии финансов и суверенные деньги (О книгах М. Кинга «Конец алхимии: деньги, банковское дело и будущее глобальной экономики» и Й. Хубера «Суверенные деньги. За пределами банковского резервирования») // Вопросы экономики. № 12. С. 131—141. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-12-131-141</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. (2017). The end of alchemy of finance and sovereign money (On the books by M. King “The end of alchemy: Money, banking and the future of the global economy” and by J. Huber “Sovereign money. Beyond reserve banking”). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 131—141. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-12-131-141</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2018a). Деньги и делиберация при капитализме и социализме // Экономическая теория: триумф или кризис? XVII Ежегодная международная конференция из цикла «Леонтьевские чтения» / Под ред. А. П. Заостровцева. СПб.: Леонтьевский центр. С. 149—169</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2018a). Money and deliberation under capitalism and socialism. In: A. P. Zaostrovtsev (ed.). Economic theory: Triumph or crisis? XVII Annual international conference from the series “Leontief readings”. St. Petersburg: Leontief Centre, pp. 149—169. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2018b). О двух типах социальных порядков. Часть 1 // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 1. С. 7—25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2018b). On two types of social orders. Part 1. Journal of Theoretical Economics, No. 1, pp. 7—25. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2018c). О двух типах социальных порядков. Часть 2-1 // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 2. С. 28—46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2018c). On two types of social orders. Part 2-1. Journal of Theoretical Economics, No. 2, pp. 28—46. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2019). О двух типах социальных порядков. Часть 2-2 // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 1. С. 7—23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2019). On two types of social orders. Part 2-2. Journal of Theoretical Economics, No. 1, P. 7—23. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефимов В. М. (2020). О политическом завещании Сталина // Journal of Economic Regulation. Т. 11, № 1. С. 6—35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yefimov V. M. (2020). On the political testament of Stalin. Journal of Economic Regulation, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 6—35. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Локк Дж. (1988). Сочинения: в 3-х т. М.: Мысль.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Locke J. (1988). Works, in three vols. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Майровски Ф. (2012). Физика и «маржиналистская революция» // Terra Economicus. Т. 10. № 1. С. 100—116.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirowski F. (2012). Physics and the “marginalist revolution”. Terra Economicus, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 100—116. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маклеод Г. Д. (1865). Основания политической экономии. СПб.: Издание Николая Тиблена.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mcleod H. D. (1865). Elements of political economy. St. Petersburg: Edition By Nikolai Tiblen. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартин Ф. (2017). Money. Неофициальная биография денег. М.: Синдбад.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martin F. (2017). Money. The unauthorized biography of money. Moscow: Sindbad. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милль Дж. С. (2011). Система логики силлогистической и индуктивной. М.: Ленанд.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mill J. S. (2011). System of syllogistic and inductive logic. Moscow: Lenand. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милль Дж. С. (2012). Об определении предмета политической экономии и о методе исследования, свойственной ей // Философия экономики. Антология / Под ред. Д. Хаусмана. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара. С. 55—76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mill J. S. (2012). On the definition of the subject of political economy and the method of research peculiar to it. In: D. Hausman (ed.). Philosophy of economics. An anthology. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ., pp. 55—76. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Резерфорд М. (2012a). Висконсинский институционализм: Джон Р. Коммонс и его студенты // Terra Economicus. Т. 10, № 2. С. 32—53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rutherford M. (2012a). Wisconsin institutionalism: John R. Commons and his students. Terra Economicus, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 32—53. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Резерфорд М. (2012b). Полевые, тайные и включенные наблюдатели в американской экономике труда: 1900—1930 годы // Terra Economicus. Т. 10, № 4. С. 91—106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rutherford M. (2012b). Field, secret and participant observers in the American labour economy: 1900—1930. Terra Economicus, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 91—106. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скидельски Р. (2005). Джон Мейнард Кейнс 1883—1946. Экономист—философ—государственный деятель. Т. 1. М.: Московcкая школа политических исследований.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skidelsky R. (2005). John Maynard Keynes 1883—1946. Economist-philosopherstatesman, Vol. 1. Moscow: Moscow school of political research. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Усанов П. В. (2020). Будущее денег: как свободные рынки победят государство. СПб.: Страта.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Usanov P. V. (2020). The future of money: How free markets will defeat the state. St. Petersburg: Strata. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Флигстин Н. (2013). Архитектура рынков. Экономическая социология капиталистических обществ XXI века. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fligstein N. (2013). Architecture of markets. Economic sociology of capitalist societies of the XXI century. Moscow: HSE Publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фридман М. (2006). Капитализм и свобода. М.: Новое издательство.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman M. (2006). Capitalism and freedom. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фридмен М. (1994). Методология позитивной экономической науки // THESIS. № 4. С. 20—52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Friedman M. (1994). Methodology of positive economic science. THESIS, No. 4, pp. 20—52. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. (1982). Теория экономического развития. М.: Прогресс.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. (1982). Theory of economic development. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. (2004). История экономического анализа: в 3-х т. СПб.: Экономическая школа.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. (2004). History of economic analysis. In 3 vols. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya Shkola. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. (2011). Десять великих экономистов от Маркса до Кейнса. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. (2011). Ten great economists from Marx to Keynes. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coats A. W. (1993). The sociology and professionalization of economics. British and American economic essays. London; New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coats A. W. (1993). The sociology and professionalization of economics. British and American economic essays. London; New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Commons J. R. (1990). Institutional economics. Its place in political economy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Commons J. R. (1990). Institutional economics. Its place in political economy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ebner A. (2000). Schumpeter and the “Schmollerprogramm”: Integrating theory and history in the analysis of economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 355—372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050020</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ebner A. (2000). Schumpeter and the “Schmollerprogramm”: Integrating theory and history in the analysis of economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 355—372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050020</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hayek F. A. (1931). Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J. M. Keynes. Economica, No. 33, pp. 270—295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548035</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hayek F. A. (1931). Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J. M. Keynes. Economica, No. 33, pp. 270—295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548035</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hayek F. A. (1932). Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J. M. Keynes (continued). Economica, No. 35, pp. 22—44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548974</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hayek F. A. (1932). Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J. M. Keynes (continued). Economica, No. 35, pp. 22—44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548974</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hodgson G. M. (2001). How economics forgot history. London; New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hodgson G. M. (2001). How economics forgot history. London; New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ingham G. (2004). The nature of money. Cambridge: Polity Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ingham G. (2004). The nature of money. Cambridge: Polity Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ingham G. (2020). Money. Ideology, history, politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ingham G. (2020). Money. Ideology, history, politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keynes J. M. (1931). The pure theory of money. A reply to Dr. Hayek. Economica, No. 34, pp. 387—397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549192</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keynes J. M. (1931). The pure theory of money. A reply to Dr. Hayek. Economica, No. 34, pp. 387—397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549192</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keynes J. M. (2013). A treatise on money, in two vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keynes J. M. (2013). A treatise on money, in two vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">King M. (2016). The end of alchemy: Money, banking and the future of the global economy. London: Little, Brown Book Group.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">King M. (2016). The end of alchemy: Money, banking and the future of the global economy. London: Little, Brown Book Group.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knapp G. F. (1924). The state theory of money. London: Macmillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knapp G. F. (1924). The state theory of money. London: Macmillan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakomski-Laguerre О. (2016). Joseph Schumpeter’s credit view of money: A contribution to a “monetary analysis” of capitalism. History of Political Economy, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 489—514. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3638655</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakomski-Laguerre О. (2016). Joseph Schumpeter’s credit view of money: A contribution to a “monetary analysis” of capitalism. History of Political Economy, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 489—514. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-3638655</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Macleod H. D. (1855). The theory and practice of banking, Vol. 1. London: Longmans.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Macleod H. D. (1855). The theory and practice of banking, Vol. 1. London: Longmans.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Macleod H. D. (1866). The Theory and practice of banking, Vol. 2. London: Longmans.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Macleod H. D. (1866). The Theory and practice of banking, Vol. 2. London: Longmans.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mirowski P. (1984). Physics and the “marginalist revolution”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 361—379. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035556</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mirowski P. (1984). Physics and the “marginalist revolution”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 361—379. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035556</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raushenbush P. A., Raushenbush E. B. (1979). Our “U.C.” story (1930—1967). Madison, WI: Raushenbush and Raushenbush.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raushenbush P. A., Raushenbush E. B. (1979). Our “U.C.” story (1930—1967). Madison, WI: Raushenbush and Raushenbush.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rutherford M. (2011). The institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918—1947: Science and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rutherford M. (2011). The institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918—1947: Science and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ryan-Collins J., Greenham T., Werner R., Jackson A. (2012). Where does money come from? London: The New Economics Foundation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ryan-Collins J., Greenham T., Werner R., Jackson A. (2012). Where does money come from? London: The New Economics Foundation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. A. (1926). Gustav v. Schmoller und die Probleme von heute. Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkwirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche, Vol. 50, pp. 1—52.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. (1926). Gustav v. Schmoller und die Probleme von heute. Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkwirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche, Vol. 50, pp. 1—52.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. A. (1930). Mitchell’s business cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 150—172. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882530</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. (1930). Mitchell’s business cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 150—172. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882530</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. A. (1970). Das Wesen des Geldes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &amp; Ruprecht.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. (1970). Das Wesen des Geldes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &amp; Ruprecht.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. A. (1996). Trattato della moneta: Capitoli inediti. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. (1996). Trattato della moneta: Capitoli inediti. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. A. (2005). Théorie de la monnaie et de la banque. Paris: L’Harmattan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. (2005). Théorie de la monnaie et de la banque. Paris: L’Harmattan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. A. (2014). A treatise on money. Aalten: Wordbridge Publishing.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. (2014). A treatise on money. Aalten: Wordbridge Publishing.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steuart J. (1767). An inquiry into the principles of political economy. London: A. Miller and T. Cadell.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Steuart J. (1767). An inquiry into the principles of political economy. London: A. Miller and T. Cadell.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waterman A. M. C. (2004). Political economy and christian theology since the enlightenment. Essays in intellectual history. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waterman A. M. C. (2004). Political economy and christian theology since the enlightenment. Essays in intellectual history. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
