voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2017-3-58-76voprecotest-286Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА ТРУДА И СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ СФЕРЫLABOR AND SOCIAL ECONOMICSСовременный университет как драйвер экономическогороста: модели и миссииModern university as an economic growth driver: Models & missionsКарповА. О.KarpovA.

д.филос. н., к.ф.-м. н., главный научный сотрудник Московского государственного технического университета имени Н.  Э. Баумана (Москва)

a.o.karpov@gmail.comМосковский государственный технический университет имени Н. Э. БауманаРоссияBauman Moscow State Technical UniversityRussian Federation201720032017035876Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20172017Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/286

В статье анализируется современный университет как драйвер экономического роста в рамках концепции университета 3.0 (образование, научные исследования, коммерциализация знаний). Показано, каким образом университет 3.0 становится основой глобальной конкурентоспособности национальных экономик и наднациональных объединений, а его предпринимательская экосистема формирует новые, быстрорастущие отрасли, перспективные технологические рынки, лидирующие административно-территориальные пространства.

The paper considers the modern university as an economic growth driver within the University 3.0 concept (education, research, and commercialization of knowledge). It demonstrates how the University 3.0 is becoming the basis for global competitiveness of national economies and international alliances, and how its business ecosystem generates new fast-growing industries, advanced technology markets and cost-efficient administrative territories.

университет 3.0экономика образованияНИОКРкоммерциализация знанийинновациипредпринимательствосетиuniversity 3.0economics of educationresearch and developmentcommercializationinnovationentrepreneurshipnetworksReferencesПлатова И., Жабенко И. (2016). Время торопит: В городе на Неве развивают Университет 4.0. В чем его отличие от других вузов // Поиск. № 30-31. С. 8-9Platova I., Zhabenko I. Time is essential: In the city on the Nеva the University 4.0 is being developed. What is the difference compared with other universities? Poisk, No. 30—31, рр. 8—9. (In Russian).Ицковиц Г. (2010). На пути к Сколково // Ицковиц Г. Тройная спираль. Университеты - предприятия - государство. Инновации в действии. Томск: Изд-во Томского гос. ун-та управления и радиоэлектроники. С. 17-24Etzkowitz G. (2010). On the way towards Skolkovo. In: Etzkowitz G. Triple helix: Universities—companies—state. Innovation in action. Tomsk: Tomsk State University of Management and Radio Electronics Publ., pp. 17—24. (In Russian).Карпов А. (2012a). Инжиниринговая платформа для трансфера технологий // Вопросы экономики. № 7. С. 47-65Karpov A. (2012a). Engineering platform for the transfer of technologies. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7, pp. 47—65. (In Russian).Карпов А. О. (2012b). Локус научной одаренности: программа «Шаг в будущее» // Вестник Российской академии наук. Т. 82. № 8. С. 725-731Karpov A. O. (2012b). Locus of scientific talent: “Step into the future” programme. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, Vol. 82, No. 8, pp. 725—731. (In Russian).Карпов А. О. (2013a). Открытые инновации и высшее образование // Высшее образование в России. № 3. С. 37-44Karpov A. O. (2013a). Open innovations and higher education. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, No. 3, pp. 37—44. (In ¬Russian).Карпов А. О. (2013b). Социальные парадигмы и парадигмально-дифференцированная система образования // Вопросы философии. № 3. С. 22-32Karpov A.O. (2013b). Social paradigms and a paradigm-differentiated system of education. Voprosy Filosofii, No. 3, pp. 22—32. (In Russian).Карпов А. О. (2014a). «Товаризация» образования против общества знаний // Вестник Российской академии наук. Т. 84. № 5. С. 434-440Karpov A. O. (2014a). “Commoditization” of education against knowledge society. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, Vol. 84, No. 5, pp. 434—440. (In Russian).Карпов А. О. (2014b). Современный университет: среда, партнерства, инновации // Alma Mater. Вестник Высшей школы. № 8. С. 8-12Karpov A O. (2014b). Modern university: environment, partnership, innovations. Alma Mater. Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly, No. 8, pp. 8—12. (In Russian).Карпов А. О. (2015а). Образование для общества знаний: генезис и социальные вызовы // Общественные науки и современность. № 5. С. 86-101Karpov A.  O. (2015а). Education for knowledge society: Genesis and social challenges. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, No. 5. рр. 86—101 (In Russian).Карпов А. О. (2015b). Основные теоретические понятия общества знаний // Вестник Российской академии наук. № 9. С. 812-820Karpov A. O. (2015b). Basic theoretical concepts of knowledge society. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, No. 9, pp. 812—820. (In Russian).Мониторинг (2016). Мониторинг эффективности инновационной деятельности университетов России. СПб.: Университет ИТМО; РВКMonitoring (2016). Efficiency monitoring of innovation activity in Russian Universities. St. Petersburg: University ITMO; RVK. (In Russian).Национальный доклад (2015). Национальный доклад об инновациях в России 2015. М.: Минэкономразвития России; Открытое правительство; РВКNational report (2015). National report on innovations in Russia 2015. Moscow: Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation; Open Government; RVK. (In Russian).Скотт Р. (2009). Инновационная стратегия Великобритании // Форсайт. Т. 3. № 4. С. 16-21Scott R. (2009). Innovative strategy in the Great Britain. Foresight, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 16—21. (In Russian).Соснова А. (2013). На своей поляне. В России есть место для инноваций // Поиск. № 26. С. 5Sosnova A. (2013). At its own place. There is room for innovations in Russia. Poisk, No. 26, p. 5. (In Russian).Титов В. В. (1999). Трансфер технологий: Учебное пособие. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУЭФTitov V.  V. (1999). Technology transfer: A textbook. St. Petersburg: UNECON Publ. (In Russian).Троу М. (1972). Социология образования // Американская социология. Перспективы, проблемы, методы / Под ред Г. В. Осипова. М.: Прогресс. С. 174-187Trow M. (1972). Sociology of education. In: G. V. Osipov (ed.). American sociology: Prospects, problems, methods. Moscow: Progress, pp. 174—187. (In Russian).Чесбро Г. (2007). Открытые инновации. М.: ПоколениеChesbrough H. (2007). Open innovation. Moscow: Pokolenie. (In Russian).Anderson R. (2010). The ‘Idea of a University’ today. History & Policy: [online serial], March 1, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-idea-of-a- university-todayAnderson R. (2010). The ‘Idea of a University’ today. History & Policy: [online serial], March 1, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-idea-of-a- university-todayAndrew J. P., De Rocco E. S., Taylor A. (2009). The innovation imperative in manufacturing: How the United States can restore its edge. Boston: BCG. Bell D. (2008). The axial age of technology foreword: 1999 // Bell D. (ed.). The coming of postindustrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N. Y.: Basic Books, pp. ix-lxxxvi.Andrew J. P., De Rocco E. S., Taylor A. (2009). The innovation imperative in manufacturing: How the United States can restore its edge. Boston: BCG. Bell D. (2008). The axial age of technology foreword: 1999 // Bell D. (ed.). The coming of postindustrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N. Y.: Basic Books, pp. ix-lxxxvi.Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 46, No. 3/4, pp. 201-234.Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 46, No. 3/4, pp. 201-234.Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 41-69.Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 41-69.Cole J.R. (2010). The great American university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable nation role, why it must be protected. N. Y.: Public Affairs.Cole J.R. (2010). The great American university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable nation role, why it must be protected. N. Y.: Public Affairs.Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. (eds.) (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with global innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO.Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. (eds.) (2016). The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with global innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO.EUA (2003). Response to the communication from the Commission “The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge”. Brussels: European University Association.EUA (2003). Response to the communication from the Commission “The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge”. Brussels: European University Association.EUA (2007). Creativity in higher education: Report on the EUA Creative Project 2006-2007. Brussels: European University Association.EUA (2007). Creativity in higher education: Report on the EUA Creative Project 2006-2007. Brussels: European University Association.Curley M., Formica P. (2013a). University ecosystems design creative spaces for idea generation and start-up experimentation. In: M. Curley, P. Formica (eds.). The experimental nature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. N. Y.: Springer, pp. 13-23.Curley M., Formica P. (2013a). University ecosystems design creative spaces for idea generation and start-up experimentation. In: M. Curley, P. Formica (eds.). The experimental nature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. N. Y.: Springer, pp. 13-23.Curley M., Formica Р. (2013b). Introduction. In: M. Curley, P. Formica (eds.). The experimental nature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. N. Y.: Springer, pp. 1-12.Curley M., Formica Р. (2013b). Introduction. In: M. Curley, P. Formica (eds.). The experimental nature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. N. Y.: Springer, pp. 1-12.CEC (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.CEC (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.CEC (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.CEC (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Drucker P. F. (2008). Concept of the corporation. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publ.Drucker P. F. (2008). Concept of the corporation. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publ.Drucker P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing society. L.: Heinemann.Drucker P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing society. L.: Heinemann.Etzkowitz H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. N.Y. and London: Routledge.Etzkowitz H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. N.Y. and London: Routledge.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1995). The Triple Helix: University-industry-govern-ment relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, Vol. 14, No. 1. Р. 14-19.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1995). The Triple Helix: University-industry-govern-ment relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, Vol. 14, No. 1. Р. 14-19.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 109-123.Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 109-123.Ferlie E., Musselin C., Andresani G. (2009). The governance of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1-20.Ferlie E., Musselin C., Andresani G. (2009). The governance of higher education systems: A public management perspective. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 1-20.Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Greenaway D., Haynes M. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans. Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 485, pp. 150-166.Greenaway D., Haynes M. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans. Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 485, pp. 150-166.Hammershoj L. G. (2009). Creativity as a question of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 545-557.Hammershoj L. G. (2009). Creativity as a question of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 545-557.Lane J. E. (2013). Higher education system 3.0: Adding value to states and institutions. In: J. E. Lane, D. B. Johnstone (eds.). Higher education system 3.0: Harnessing systemness, delivering performance. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 3-26.Lane J. E. (2013). Higher education system 3.0: Adding value to states and institutions. In: J. E. Lane, D. B. Johnstone (eds.). Higher education system 3.0: Harnessing systemness, delivering performance. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 3-26.Machlup F. (2014). Knowledge: Its creation, distribution and economic significance. Vol. I: Knowledge and knowledge production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Machlup F. (2014). Knowledge: Its creation, distribution and economic significance. Vol. I: Knowledge and knowledge production. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Machlup F., Kronwinkler T. (1975). Workers who produce knowledge: A steady increase, 1900 to 1970. Review of World Economics, Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. 752-759.Machlup F., Kronwinkler T. (1975). Workers who produce knowledge: A steady increase, 1900 to 1970. Review of World Economics, Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. 752-759.Martin P., Morris R., Rogers A., Kilgallon S. (2010). What are creative spaces? In: P. Martin (ed.). Making space for creativity. Brighton: University of Brighton, pp. 23-26.Martin P., Morris R., Rogers A., Kilgallon S. (2010). What are creative spaces? In: P. Martin (ed.). Making space for creativity. Brighton: University of Brighton, pp. 23-26.Paradeise C., Reale E., Goastellec G. A. (2009a). Comporative approach to higher educations reform in Western European countries. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 197-226.Paradeise C., Reale E., Goastellec G. A. (2009a). Comporative approach to higher educations reform in Western European countries. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 197-226.Paradeise C., Reale E., Goastellec G., Bleiklie I. (2009b). Universities Steering between Stories and History. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 227-290.Paradeise C., Reale E., Goastellec G., Bleiklie I. (2009b). Universities Steering between Stories and History. In: C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, E. Ferlie (eds.). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 227-290.Pollеt C., Bouckaert G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Pollеt C., Bouckaert G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Thursby J., Kemp S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 109-124.Thursby J., Kemp S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 109-124.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.