voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-98-134voprecotest-27Research ArticleВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИISSUES OF THEORYНаучные исследования в повседневной жизниOn everyday academic researchТирольЖ.TiroleJ.

председатель совета директоров Тулузской школы экономики, директор Института экономики промышленности (Тулуза, Франция)

jean.tirole@tse-fr.euТулузская школа экономики; Институт экономики промышленностиФранцияToulouse School of EconomicsFrance2017200920170998134Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20172017Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/27

Публикуемый материал - четвертая глава книги «Экономика общего блага», в которой обсуждается характер экономики как науки и исследовательской практики в ее теоретическом и эмпирическом аспектах. Рассматриваются процессы моделирования, эмпирической проверки моделей и оценки качества исследований. Анализируются особенности экономического познания и роль математики в экономических исследованиях, в том числе на примере актуальных исследований в теории игр и теории информации.

In the fourth chapter of the book “The economy of the common good”, the nature of economics as a science and research practices in their theoretical and empirical aspects are discussed. The author considers the processes of modeling, empirical verification of models and evaluation of research quality. In addition, the features of economic cognition and the role of mathematics in economic research are analyzed, including the example of relevant research in game theory and information theory.

экономические моделиэкономическое познаниеоценка качества исследованийeconomic modelseconomic knowledgeestimation of research qualityReferencesAngrist J., Evans W. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply. Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 450-477.Angrist J., Evans W. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply. Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 450-477.Banerjee A., Duflo E. (2012). Repenser la pauvreté. Paris: Seuil.Banerjee A., Duflo E. (2012). Repenser la pauvreté. Paris: Seuil.Berlin I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox. An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Berlin I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox. An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Dasgupta P. (2002). Modern economics and its critics. In: U. Mäki (ed.). Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Dasgupta P. (2002). Modern economics and its critics. In: U. Mäki (ed.). Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Falk A., Tirole J. (2016). Narratives, imperatives and moral reasoning. Unpublished manuscript.Falk A., Tirole J. (2016). Narratives, imperatives and moral reasoning. Unpublished manuscript.Fehr E., Falk A. (1999). Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete contract market. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 106-134.Fehr E., Falk A. (1999). Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete contract market. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, No. 1, pp. 106-134.Fishman R., Kariv S., Markovits D. (2009). Exposure to ideology and distributional preferences. Unpublished manuscript.Fishman R., Kariv S., Markovits D. (2009). Exposure to ideology and distributional preferences. Unpublished manuscript.Frey B., Meier S. (2005). Selfish and indoctrinated economists? European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 165-171.Frey B., Meier S. (2005). Selfish and indoctrinated economists? European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 165-171.Gollier Ch. (2012). Pricing the planet’s future? The economics of discounting in an uncertain world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Gollier Ch. (2012). Pricing the planet’s future? The economics of discounting in an uncertain world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Levitt S., List J. (2009). Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 1-18.Levitt S., List J. (2009). Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 1-18.Palacios-Huerta I. (2003). Professionals play Minimax. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 395-415.Palacios-Huerta I. (2003). Professionals play Minimax. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 395-415.Rodrik D. (2007). Why we use math in economics. Dani Rodrik’s Webblog, September 4. http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/09/why-we-use-math.htmlRodrik D. (2007). Why we use math in economics. Dani Rodrik’s Webblog, September 4. http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/09/why-we-use-math.htmlRodrik D. (2015). Economics rules. The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. New York: Norton.Rodrik D. (2015). Economics rules. The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. New York: Norton.Solow R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65-94.Solow R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65-94.Tetlock Ph. (2005). Expert political judgement. How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Tetlock Ph. (2005). Expert political judgement. How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Tetlock Ph., Gardner D. (2015). Superforcasting: The art and science of prediction New York: Crown.Tetlock Ph., Gardner D. (2015). Superforcasting: The art and science of prediction New York: Crown.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.