voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2020-2-101-124voprecotest-2666Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА ПРЕДПРИЯТИЙENTERPRISE ECONOMICSОценка рыночного отбора в России: когда размер (фирмы) имеет значениеMeasuring the strength of market selection in Russia: When the (firm) size mattershttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9469-0510СавинИ. В.SavinIvan V.

Савин Иван Валерьевич, PhD, н. с. Института экологических наук и технологий UAB (Барселона, Испания), проф. кафедры эконометрики и статистики УрФУ

Екатеринбург

Yekaterinburg

ivan.savin@urfu.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-8434МариевО. С.MarievOleg S.

Мариев Олег Святославович, к. э. н., доцент, заведующий кафедрой эконометрики и статистики УрФУ

Екатеринбург

Yekaterinburg

o.s.mariev@urfu.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2193-1619ПушкаревА. А.PushkarevAndrey A.

Пушкарев Андрей Александрович, старший преподаватель кафедры эконометрики и статистики УрФУ

Екатеринбург

Yekaterinburg

a.a.pushkarev@urfu.ruАвтономный университет Барселоны UAB; Уральский федеральный университетРоссияUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain); Ural Federal UniversityRussian FederationУральский федеральный университетРоссияUral Federal UniversityRussian Federation20200702202002101124Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20202020Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2666

В статье оценивается эффективность конкурентного отбора на основе данных по промышленным предприятиям России за 2006—2017 гг. и проводится сравнение с результатами для ряда зарубежных стран. С этой целью осуществлена декомпозиция агрегированной производительности труда на уровне отрасли, чтобы определить вклад перераспределения долей фирм на рынке от менее к более производительным компаниям, а также дана непосредственная эконометрическая оценка взаимосвязи производительности компаний и роста их выручки. Полученные результаты свидетельствуют о небольшом значении рыночного отбора в России. Если измерять производительность компаний через производительность труда, то оценки по России ниже, чем по другим странам ОЭСР, а оценки на основе общей факторной производительности в целом сопоставимы. Для малых и средних предприятий роль конкурентного отбора выше, что указывает на необходимость стимулировать конкуренцию, особенно среди крупных компаний.

In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of market selection based on data of Russian manufacturing firms from 2006 to 2017 and compare our results with those for foreign countries. To do this, we decompose the labor productivity at the industry level to determine the contribution from the redistribution of market shares from less to more productive companies. We also conduct a direct econometric assessment of the relationship between firm productivity and revenue growth. The results obtained indicate a moderate role of market selection in Russia. If we measure the firm productivity by estimating the value added per employee (labour productivity), then estimates for Russia are lower than for other OECD countries, while estimates based on total factor productivity are generally comparable. We also find that the role of market selection is higher for small and medium-sized enterprizes, which indicates the need to stimulate competition especially among large firms.

размер фирмыконкуренцияпроизводительность трудамалые и средние предприятияfirm sizecompetitionlabor productivitysmall and medium-sized enterprisesИсследование поддержано грантом Президента Российской Федерации для молодых докторов наук МД-3196.2019.6.ReferencesБирюков А. (2004). Развитие малого и среднего бизнеса — локомотив экономики (опыт Тайваня) // Вопросы экономики. № 9. С. 123—129. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2004-9-123-129Biryukov A. (2004). Development of small and medium business — the locomotive of the economy (The case of Taiwan). Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 123—129. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2004-9-123-129Виленский А. (2011). Парадокс поддержки малого бизнеса: предварительные итоги кризиса // Вопросы экономики. № 6. С. 149—155. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-6-149-155Vilensky A. (2011). The paradox of small business support: Preliminary outcomes of the crisis. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 6, pp. 149—155. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2011-6-149-155Воскобойников И., Гимпельсон В. (2015). Рост производительности труда, структурные сдвиги и неформальная занятость в российской экономике // Вопросы экономики. № 11. С. 30—61. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-30-61Voskoboynikov I., Gimpelson V. (2015). Productivity growth, structural change and informality: The case of Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 30—61. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-30-61Гимпельсон В., Жихарева О., Капелюшников Р. (2014). Движение рабочих мест: что говорит российская статистика // Вопросы экономики. № 7. С. 93—126. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-93-126Gimpelson V., Zhikhareva O., Kapeliushnikov R. (2014). Job turnover: What the russian statistics tells us. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 7 pp. 93—126. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-93-126Медовников Д., Оганесян Т., Розмирович С. (2016). Кандидаты в чемпионы: средние быстрорастущие компании и программы их поддержки // Вопросы экономики. № 9. С. 50—66. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-9-50-66Medovnikov D., Oganesyan T., Rozmirovich S. (2016). Сandidates for the championship: Medium-sized high growth companies and state-run programs for their support. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 9, pp. 50—66. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-9-50-66Савин И. В., Мариев О. С., Пушкарев А. А. (2019). Выживает сильнейший? Измерение конкурентного отбора на примере Уральского федерального округа // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. Т. 23. № 1. С. 90—117. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2019-23-1-90-117Savin I., Mariev O., Pushkarev A. (2019). Survival of the fittest? Measuring the strength of market selection on the example of the Urals Federal District. HSE Economic Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 90—117. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2019-23-1-90-117Чигрин А. Д. (2018). Малый бизнес и конкурентоспособность России — нетрадиционная трактовка // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 3 (39). С. 110—127. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-39-3-5Chigrin A. D. (2018). Small business and the competitiveness of Russia: An unconventional view. Zhournal Novoi Ekonomicheskoi Associacii, No. 3 (39), pp. 110—127. (In Russian). http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-39-3-5Acemoglu D., Akcigit U., Bloom N., Kerr W. R. (2013). Innovation, reallocation and growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 18993. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18993Acemoglu D., Akcigit U., Bloom N., Kerr W. R. (2013). Innovation, reallocation and growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 18993. https://doi.org/10.3386/w18993Acs Z. J., Preston L. (1997). Small and medium-sized enterprises, technology, and globalization: Introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy. Small Business Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007945327618Acs Z. J., Preston L. (1997). Small and medium-sized enterprises, technology, and globalization: Introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy. Small Business Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 1—6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007945327618Baily M. N., Hulten C., Campbell D., Bresnahan T., Caves R. E. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 23, pp. 187—267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534764Baily M. N., Hulten C., Campbell D., Bresnahan T., Caves R. E. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 23, pp. 187—267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534764Baldwin J. R., Gu W. (2006). Plant turnover and productivity growth in Canadian manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 417—465. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj017Baldwin J. R., Gu W. (2006). Plant turnover and productivity growth in Canadian manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 417—465. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj017Bartelsman E., Scarpetta S., Schivardi F. (2005). Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: Evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 365—391. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth057Bartelsman E., Scarpetta S., Schivardi F. (2005). Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: Evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 365—391. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth057Bottazzi G., Dosi G., Jacoby N., Secchi A., Tamagni F. (2010). Corporate performances and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 1953—1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq063Bottazzi G., Dosi G., Jacoby N., Secchi A., Tamagni F. (2010). Corporate performances and market selection: Some comparative evidence. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 1953—1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq063Bottazzi G., Secchi A., Tamagni F. (2014). Financial constraints and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 99—116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9465-5Bottazzi G., Secchi A., Tamagni F. (2014). Financial constraints and firm dynamics. Small Business Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 99—116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9465-5Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. (2003). Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 793—808. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815736Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. (2003). Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 793—808. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815736Brown J. D., Crespi G.A., Iacovone L., Marcolin L. (2018). Decomposing firm-level productivity growth and assessing its determinants: evidence from the Americas. Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1571—1606. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0450-2_ch5Brown J. D., Crespi G.A., Iacovone L., Marcolin L. (2018). Decomposing firm-level productivity growth and assessing its determinants: evidence from the Americas. Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 1571—1606. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0450-2_ch5Cantner U., Savin I., Vannuccini S. (2019). Replicator dynamics in value chains: Explaining some puzzles of market selection. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 589—611. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty060Cantner U., Savin I., Vannuccini S. (2019). Replicator dynamics in value chains: Explaining some puzzles of market selection. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 589—611. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty060Carpenter R. E., Petersen B. C. (2002). Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance? Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 298—309. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317411541Carpenter R. E., Petersen B. C. (2002). Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance? Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 298—309. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317411541d’Andria D., Savin I. (2018). A win-win-win? Motivating innovation in a knowledge economy with tax incentives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 127, pp. 38—56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.030d’Andria D., Savin I. (2018). A win-win-win? Motivating innovation in a knowledge economy with tax incentives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 127, pp. 38—56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.030Disney R., Haskel J., Heden Y. (2003). Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 91—112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00193Disney R., Haskel J., Heden Y. (2003). Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 91—112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00193Dosi G., Grazzi M. (2006). Technologies as problem-solving procedures and technologies as input—output relations: Some perspectives on the theory of production. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 173—202. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj010Dosi G., Grazzi M. (2006). Technologies as problem-solving procedures and technologies as input—output relations: Some perspectives on the theory of production. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 173—202. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtj010Dosi G., Moschella D., Pugliese E., Tamagni F. (2015). Productivity, market selection, and corporate growth: Comparative evidence across US and Europe. Small Business Economics, Vol. 45, pp. 643—672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9655-zDosi G., Moschella D., Pugliese E., Tamagni F. (2015). Productivity, market selection, and corporate growth: Comparative evidence across US and Europe. Small Business Economics, Vol. 45, pp. 643—672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9655-zDosi G., Luna I., Mathew N., Netto E. Y. H., Savin I., Yu X. (2017) Productivity, market selection and corporate growth: Comparative evidence from BRIC nations. Proceedings of the 5 th CONCORDi conference in Seville, September.Dosi G., Luna I., Mathew N., Netto E. Y. H., Savin I., Yu X. (2017) Productivity, market selection and corporate growth: Comparative evidence from BRIC nations. Proceedings of the 5 th CONCORDi conference in Seville, September.Foster L., Haltiwanger J., Krizan C. J. (2001). New Developments in Productivity Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Foster L., Haltiwanger J., Krizan C. J. (2001). New Developments in Productivity Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Gould S. J. (1975). Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. New York: W.W. Norton.Gould S. J. (1975). Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. New York: W.W. Norton.Griliches Z., Regev H. (1995). Firm productivity in Israeli industry 1979—1988. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 175—203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01601-UGriliches Z., Regev H. (1995). Firm productivity in Israeli industry 1979—1988. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 175—203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01601-UHollenstein H. (2005). Determinants of international activities: Are SMEs different? Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 431—450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6455-xHollenstein H. (2005). Determinants of international activities: Are SMEs different? Small Business Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 431—450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-6455-xHopenhayn H. A. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 1127—1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951541Hopenhayn H. A. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 1127—1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951541Jovanovic B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 649—670. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912606Jovanovic B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 649—670. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912606Melitz M. J., Polanec S. (2015). Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 362—375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12088Melitz M. J., Polanec S. (2015). Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 362—375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12088Metcalfe J. S. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London, New York: Routledge.Metcalfe J. S. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London, New York: Routledge.Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Okawa Y., Sanghi A. (2018). Potential Growth: Outlook and Options for the Russian Federation. World Bank Group Policy Research working paper, No. WPS 8663. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8663Okawa Y., Sanghi A. (2018). Potential Growth: Outlook and Options for the Russian Federation. World Bank Group Policy Research working paper, No. WPS 8663. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8663Olley G. S., Pakes A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 1263—297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831Olley G. S., Pakes A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 1263—297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831Ortega-Argils R., Vivarelli M., Voigt P. (2009). R&D in SMEs: A paradox? Small Business Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 3—11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9187-5Ortega-Argils R., Vivarelli M., Voigt P. (2009). R&D in SMEs: A paradox? Small Business Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 3—11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9187-5Silverberg G., Dosi G., Orsenigo L. (1988). Innovation, diversity and diffusion: A self-organisation model. Economic Journal, Vol. 98, No. 393, pp. 1032—1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233718Silverberg G., Dosi G., Orsenigo L. (1988). Innovation, diversity and diffusion: A self-organisation model. Economic Journal, Vol. 98, No. 393, pp. 1032—1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233718Van Beveren I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 98—128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.xVan Beveren I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 98—128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.xvan den Bergh J. C. J. M., Savin I., Drews S. (2019). Evolution of opinions in the growth-vs-environment debate: Extended replicator dynamics. Futures, Vol. 109, pp. 84—100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.024van den Bergh J. C. J. M., Savin I., Drews S. (2019). Evolution of opinions in the growth-vs-environment debate: Extended replicator dynamics. Futures, Vol. 109, pp. 84—100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.024Yu X., Dosi G., Grazzi, M., Lei J. (2017). Inside the virtous circle between productivity, profitability, investment and corporate growth: An anatomy of Chinese industrialization. Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1020—1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.006Yu X., Dosi G., Grazzi, M., Lei J. (2017). Inside the virtous circle between productivity, profitability, investment and corporate growth: An anatomy of Chinese industrialization. Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1020—1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.006

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.