voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-63-82voprecotest-25Research ArticleРЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКАREGIONAL ECONOMYСудьбы российских регионов-доноровThe trajectories of donor regions in RussiaЮшковА. О.YushkovA.

M.Sc. (Econ.), н.  с. Международного центра социально-экономических исследований (МЦСЭИ) «Леонтьевский центр» (Санкт-Петербург)

yushkov@leontief.ruОдингН. Ю.OdingN.

к.  э.  н., руководитель исследовательского отдела МЦСЭИ «Леонтьевский центр»

oding@leontief.ruСавулькинЛ. И.SavulkinL.

к.  г.  н., с.  н.  с. МЦСЭИ «Леонтьевский центр»

savul@leontief.ruМеждународный центр социально-экономических исследований (МЦСЭИ) «Леонтьевский центр»РоссияInternational Centre for Social and Economic Research “Leontief Centre”Russian Federation201720092017096382Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20172017Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/25

В статье представлена динамика налоговых поступлений и межбюджетных трансфертов в 27 российских регионах-донорах, составляющих основу бюджетной системы страны. Представлена новая классификация регионов-донора, в рамках которой отдельно изучена группа регионов, утративших статус доноров в течение последнего десятилетия. Рассматриваются возможные пути увеличения финансовой самостоятельности регионов и возвращения регионам с высоким налоговым потенциалом статуса донора за счет перераспределения отдельных налогов между уровнями бюджетной системы.

The article cosiders the dynamics of tax revenues and intergovernmental transfers in 27 Russian donor regions, which form the basis of the country’s budget system. A new classification of donor regions is presented, within which a group of regions that have lost their ‘donor’ status during the last decade has been studied separately. The paper also discusses the possible ways of increasing the financial autonomy of the regions and redistribution of taxes between federal and regional levels of the budget system in order to increase the number of donor regions.

регионы-донорыналоговые поступлениямежбюджетные трансфертыбюджетный федерализмdonor regionstax revenuesintergovernmental transfersfiscal federalismReferencesКузнецова О. (1999). Баланс финансовых потоков между центром и регионами // Федеральный бюджет и регионы. Опыт анализа финансовых потоков / Под ред. А. Лаврова. М.: Диалог-МГУ. С. 12-34Kuznetsova O. (1999). Balance of financial flows between the center and the regions. In: A. Lavrov (ed.). The federal budget and the regions. Experience in analyzing financial flows. Moscow: Dialog-MGU, pp. 12—34. (In Russian).Поварова А. (2014). Взаимоотношения металлургических комбинатов с бюджетом: долги растут, налоги падают // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. № 6. C. 159-182Povarova A. (2014). Relationship between metallurgical works and the budget: debt increases, taxes decline. Ekonomicheskiye i ¬Sotsialnyye Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz, No. 6, pp. 159—182. (In Russian).Ambrosanio M., Bordignon M. (2006). Normative versus positive theories of revenue assignments in federations. In: E. Ahmad, G. Brosio (eds.). Handbook of fiscal federalism. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 306-338.Ambrosanio M., Bordignon M. (2006). Normative versus positive theories of revenue assignments in federations. In: E. Ahmad, G. Brosio (eds.). Handbook of fiscal federalism. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 306-338.Baskaran T., Feld L., Necker S. (2017). Depressing dependence? Transfers and economic growth in the German states, 1975-2005. Regional Studies, Published online: Jan. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255318.Baskaran T., Feld L., Necker S. (2017). Depressing dependence? Transfers and economic growth in the German states, 1975-2005. Regional Studies, Published online: Jan. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255318.Bauer A. et al. (2016). Natural resource revenue sharing. New York: Natural Resource Governance Institute.Bauer A. et al. (2016). Natural resource revenue sharing. New York: Natural Resource Governance Institute.Béland D., Lecours A. (2010). Federalism and fiscal policy: The politics of equalization in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 569-596.Béland D., Lecours A. (2010). Federalism and fiscal policy: The politics of equalization in Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 569-596.Béland D., Lecours A. (2016). Canada’s equalization policy in comparative perspective (IRPP Insight No. 9). Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Béland D., Lecours A. (2016). Canada’s equalization policy in comparative perspective (IRPP Insight No. 9). Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Bird R. (2010). Subnational taxation in developing countries. A review of the literature. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5450.Bird R. (2010). Subnational taxation in developing countries. A review of the literature. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5450.Bird R., Smart M. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 899-912.Bird R., Smart M. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 899-912.Boadway R. (2004). The theory and practice of equalization. CESIfo Economic Studies, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 211-254.Boadway R. (2004). The theory and practice of equalization. CESIfo Economic Studies, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 211-254.Bucovetsky S., Smart M. (2006). The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 119-144.Bucovetsky S., Smart M. (2006). The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 119-144.Freinkman L., Kholodilin K., Thiessen U. (2011). Incentive effects of fiscal equalization. Eastern European Economics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 5-29.Freinkman L., Kholodilin K., Thiessen U. (2011). Incentive effects of fiscal equalization. Eastern European Economics, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 5-29.Silva E. (2017). Tax competition and federal equalization schemes with decentralized leadership. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 24, pp. 164-178.Silva E. (2017). Tax competition and federal equalization schemes with decentralized leadership. International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 24, pp. 164-178.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.