<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2019-9-112-122</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-2400</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>НАУЧНЫЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH NOTES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Хайп вокруг (не)денежной (не)теории</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Hype around (non)monetary (non)theory</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-5403</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Моисеев</surname><given-names>С.  Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Moiseev</surname><given-names>Sergey  R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Моисеев Сергей Рустамович - д. э. н., советник первого заместителя Председателя Банка России</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">msr@mail.cbr.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Банк России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>The Bank of Russia</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>112</fpage><lpage>122</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2400">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2400</self-uri><abstract><p>В 2019 г. на политический олимп ворвалась доктрина, называемая «современной денежной теорией», или «современной теорией денег» (Modern Monetary Theory, ММТ). Политические, научные и финансовые круги в США, Великобритании, Австралии активно обсуждают то, что ранее казалось немыслимым: бюджетный дефицит не имеет значения, денежный станок способен покрыть разницу между госрасходами и налогами, не вызывая инфляцию, и другие известные идеи, представшие в новом свете. Острую критику ММТ озвучили экономисты разного толка — от К. Рогоффа и Л. Саммерса из Гарвардского университета до П. Кругмана из Городского университета Нью-Йорка. Все они утверждают, что под новой теорией скрывается простой левый популизм. Представители ММТ полагают, что после победы их сторонников на предстоящих выборах в США в истории экономической науки и в политике будет открыта новая страница.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In 2019 the doctrine, called “Modern Monetary Theory” (MMT), broke into the political Olympus. Political, academic and financial circles in the USA, the United Kingdom and Australia are actively discussing what was previously unthinkable: the budget deficit does not matter, the money printing is able to close the gap between government spending and taxes without inflation pressuring and other well-known ideas presented in a new light. The strict criticism of MMT was voiced by the economists of all kinds, from Kenneth Rogoff and Lawrence Summers from Harvard University to Paul Krugman from the City University of New York. All of them claim that under the mask of a new theory simple left populism is hidden. Representatives of MMT believe that when their supporters win in the upcoming elections in the USA, they will open a new page in the history of economics and politics.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>современная денежная теория</kwd><kwd>денежно-кредитная политика</kwd><kwd>налогово-бюджетная политика</kwd><kwd>центральный банк</kwd><kwd>макроэкономика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>modern monetary theory</kwd><kwd>monetary policy</kwd><kwd>fiscal policy</kwd><kwd>central bank</kwd><kwd>macroeconomics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Connors L., Mitchell W. (2017). Framing Modern Monetary Theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 239—259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2016.1262746</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Connors L., Mitchell W. (2017). Framing Modern Monetary Theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 239—259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2016.1262746</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coy P., Dmitrieva K., Boesler M. (2019). Warren Buffett hates it. AOC is for it. A beginner’s guide to Modern Monetary Theory. Bloomberg Businessweek, 21 March.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coy P., Dmitrieva K., Boesler M. (2019). Warren Buffett hates it. AOC is for it. A beginner’s guide to Modern Monetary Theory. Bloomberg Businessweek, 21 March.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dalio R. (2018). Principles for navigating big debt crises. Westport: Bridgewater.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dalio R. (2018). Principles for navigating big debt crises. Westport: Bridgewater.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">IGM (2019). Modern Monetary Theory. University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 13.03. http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/modern-monetary-theory</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">IGM (2019). Modern Monetary Theory. University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 13.03. http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/modern-monetary-theory</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">IMF (2019). Transcript of International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde’s opening press conference, 2019 Spring Meetings. 11 April. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2019/04/11/tr041119-transcript-managing-director-christine-lagarde-press-conference-2019-spring-meetings</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">IMF (2019). Transcript of International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde’s opening press conference, 2019 Spring Meetings. 11 April. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2019/04/11/tr041119-transcript-managing-director-christine-lagarde-press-conference-2019-spring-meetings</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knapp G. (1905). Staatliche Theorie des Geldes. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knapp G. (1905). Staatliche Theorie des Geldes. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krugman P. (2019a). Running on MMT (Wonkish). The New York Times, 25 February.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman P. (2019a). Running on MMT (Wonkish). The New York Times, 25 February.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krugman P. (2019b). What’s wrong with functional finance? (Wonkish). The New York Times, 12 February.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman P. (2019b). What’s wrong with functional finance? (Wonkish). The New York Times, 12 February.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Minsky H. (1965). The role of employment policy. In: M. S. Gordon (ed.). Poverty in America: Proceedings of a national conference held at the University of California, Berkeley, Feb. 26—28. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 175—200.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minsky H. (1965). The role of employment policy. In: M. S. Gordon (ed.). Poverty in America: Proceedings of a national conference held at the University of California, Berkeley, Feb. 26—28. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 175—200.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mitchell W. (1998). The buffer stock employment model and the NAIRU: The path to full employment. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 547—555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506063</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mitchell W. (1998). The buffer stock employment model and the NAIRU: The path to full employment. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 547—555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506063</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mitchell W., Wray R., Watts M. (2019). Macroeconomics. London: Macmillan Education.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mitchell W., Wray R., Watts M. (2019). Macroeconomics. London: Macmillan Education.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nesiba R. (2013). Do institutionalists and post-Keynesians share a common approach to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)? European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 44—60. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2013.01.05</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nesiba R. (2013). Do institutionalists and post-Keynesians share a common approach to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)? European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 44—60. https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2013.01.05</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Praet P. (2019). Twitter Q&amp;A with Peter Praet. European Central Bank, 12.03. https://twitter.com/i/moments/1105523805248778246</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Praet P. (2019). Twitter Q&amp;A with Peter Praet. European Central Bank, 12.03. https://twitter.com/i/moments/1105523805248778246</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rogoff K. (2019). Modern monetary nonsense. Project Syndicate, March 4. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/federal-reserve-modern-monetary-theory-dangers-by-kenneth-rogoff-2019-03</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rogoff K. (2019). Modern monetary nonsense. Project Syndicate, March 4. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/federal-reserve-modern-monetary-theory-dangers-by-kenneth-rogoff-2019-03</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samuelson P. (1990). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samuelson P. (1990). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stone J. (2015). Plough quantitative easing cash into building homes and infrastructure, says Jeremy Corbyn. The Independent, 9 July.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stone J. (2015). Plough quantitative easing cash into building homes and infrastructure, says Jeremy Corbyn. The Independent, 9 July.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tcherneva P. (2002). Monopoly money: The state as a price setter. Oeconomicus, Vol. 5, pp. 124—143.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tcherneva P. (2002). Monopoly money: The state as a price setter. Oeconomicus, Vol. 5, pp. 124—143.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Walsh B. (2018). Stephanie Kelton wants you to rethink the deficit. Barron’s, 13 September.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Walsh B. (2018). Stephanie Kelton wants you to rethink the deficit. Barron’s, 13 September.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
