voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2019-7-119-146voprecotest-2314Research ArticleДИСКУССИОННЫЙ КЛУБDEBATING SOCIETYContra панинституционализм. Часть IContra pan-institutionalism. Part Ihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-2110КапелюшниковР. И.KapeliushnikovRostislav I.

Капелюшников Ростислав Исаакович, чл.-корр. РАН, д. э. н., гл. н. с. ИМЭМО РАН, замдиректора Центра трудовых исследований НИУ ВШЭ

Москва

Moscow

rostis@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский институт мировой экономики и международных отношений имени Е. М. Примакова РАН; Центр трудовых исследований Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияPrimakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS; Centre for Labour Market Studies, National Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation20190307201907119146Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20192019Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2314

Работа посвящена критическому анализу панинституционализма — подхода, объясняющего ход мировой экономической истории изменениями в формальных экономических и формальных политических институтах. Этот подход монокаузален, так как для него формальные институты не просто «имеют значение»: де-факто, только они и имеют значение. Наиболее полные и развернутые версии панинституционализма были представлены в книгах, получивших широкую известность во всем мире, — «Насилие и социальные порядки» Д. Норта, Дж. Уоллиса и Б. Вайнгаста и «Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные» Д. Аджемоглу и Дж. Робинсона. Российское академическое сообщество восприняло их идеи как последнее слово современной экономической и политологической мысли. В работе ракрываются методологическая узость, концептуальная противоречивость и историческая неадекватность панинституционалистского подхода.

The paper provides a critical assessment of Pan-i nstitutionalism — an approach which tries to explain the course of the world economic history by changes in formal economic and formal political institutions. This approach is mono-causal since for it formal institutions do not simply matter: in fact they are all that matter. The most complete and elaborated versions of Pan-institutionalism were presented i n two famous books — “Violence and social order” by North, Wallis and Wei ngast and “Why nations fail” by Acemoglu and Robinson. Their ideas were taken by the Russian academic community as the last word in the modern economic and political sciences. The paper demonstrates methodological narrowness, conceptual inconsistency and historical inadequacy of Pan-institutionalism. In particular, it fails to provide a coherent explanation of the turning point of the world economic history — the Industrial revolution in England in the mid of XVIII century, i.e. a transition from Malthusian to Schumpeterian economic growth.

институтыправа собственностиэкономический ростНортАджемоглуinstitutionsproperty rightseconomic growthNorthAcemogluReferencesАджемоглу Д., Робинсон Дж. А. (2016). Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные. М.: АСТ.Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. (2016). Why nations fail. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).Арсланов В. В. (2016). География, институты и истоки глобального неравенства: критика концепции экономического развития Аджемоглу и Робинсона. М.: Институт экономики РАН.Arslanov V. V. (2016). Geography, institutions and origins of global inequality: A critique Acemoglu and Robinson’s theory of economic development. Moscow: Institute of Economics, RAS. (In Russian).Заостровцев А. П. (2013). Об историческо-институциональных причинах отставания в развитии: концепция Асемоглу—Робинсона (Препринт М-34/13). СПб.: Изд-во ЕУСПб.Zaostrovtsev A. P. (2013). On the historical-institutional causes of the lag in development: The theory of Acemoglu—Robinson(Preprint М-34/13). St. Petersburg: EUSP Publ. (In Russian).Кейнс Дж. М. (1978). Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. М.: Прогресс.Keynes J. M. (1978). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Мoscow: Progress. (In Russian).Кларк Г. (2012). Прощай, нищета! Краткая экономическая история мира. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.Clark G. (2012). A farewell to alms: A brief economic history of the world. Мoscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).Натхов Т. В., Полищук Л. И. (2017a). Политэкономия институтов и развитие: как важно быть инклюзивным. Размышления над книгой D. Acemoglu, J. Robinson. “Why nations fail”. Часть I. Институты и экономическое развитие. Институциональный выбор // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 2. С. 12—38.Natkhov T. V., Polishchuk L. I. (2017a). Political economy of institutions and development: The importance of being inclusive reflection on “Why nations fail” by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part I. Institutions and Economic Development. Institutional Choice. Zhurnal Novoj Ekonomicheskoj Associacii, No. 2, pp. 12—38. (In Russian).Натхов Т. В., Полищук Л. И. (2017b). Политэкономия институтов и развитие: как важно быть инклюзивным. Размышления над книгой D. Acemoglu, J. Robinson. “Why nations fail”. Часть II. Институциональная динамика и выводы для России // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 3. С. 12—32.Natkhov T. V., Polishchuk L. I. (2017b). Political economy of institutions and development: The importance of being inclusive reflection on “Why nations fail” by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Part II. Institutional change and implications for Russia. Zhurnal Novoj Ekonomicheskoj Associacii, No. 3, pp. 12—32. (In Russian).Норт Д. (2004). Функционирование экономики во времени // Отечественные записки . № 6. С. 82—103.North D. (2004). Economic performance through time. Otechestvennye Zapiski, No. 6, pp. 82—103. (In Russian).Норт Д., Уоллис Дж., Вайнгаст Б. (2011). Насилие и социальные порядки: Концептуальные рамки для интерпретации письменной истории человечества. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.North D., Wallis J., Weingast B. (2011). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Мoscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (In Russian).Пайпс Р. (2008). Собственность и свобода. М.: Московская школа политических исследований.Pipes R. (20 0 8). Property and freedom. Мoscow: Moscow School of Political Studies. (In Russian).Расков Д. (2011). Институциональные исследования как будущее социальных наук // Норт Д., Уоллис Дж., Вайнгаст Б. Насилие и социальные порядки: Концептуальные рамки для интерпретации письменной истории человечества. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара. С. 9—31.Raskov D. (2011). Institutional studies as the future of social sciences. In: North D., Wallis J., Weingast B. Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Мoscow: Gaidar Institute Publ., pp. 9—31. (In Russian).Тамбовцев В. Л. (2019). Идеи и интересы, экономическая политика и институты. // Вопросы экономики. № 5. С. 26—45. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-5-26-45Tambovtsev V. L. (2019). Ideas and interests, economic policy and institutions. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 5, pp. 26—45. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-5-26-45Хайек Ф. А. (2018). Конституция свободы. М.: Новое издательство.Hayek F. A. (2018). The constitution of liberty. Мoscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo. (In Russian).Acemoglu D. (2008). Growth and Institutions. In: S. N. Durlauf, L. E. Blume (eds.). The New Palgrave dictionary of economics, Vol. 3. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2598—2603.Acemoglu D. (2008). Growth and Institutions. In: S. N. Durlauf, L. E. Blume (eds.). The New Palgrave dictionary of economics, Vol. 3. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2598—2603.Acemoglu D., Johnson S. H. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 113, No. 4, pp. 949—995.Acemoglu D., Johnson S. H. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 113, No. 4, pp. 949—995.Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A. (2005a). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: P. Aghion, S. N. Durlauf (eds.). Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1A. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, pp. 385—472.Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A. (2005a). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In: P. Aghion, S. N. Durlauf (eds.). Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1A. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, pp. 385—472.Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robi nson J. A., Yared. P. (20 05b). From education to democracy? American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 44—49. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774669916Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robi nson J. A., Yared. P. (20 05b). From education to democracy? American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 44—49. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774669916Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A., Yared. P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 808—842. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.808Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A., Yared. P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 808—842. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.808Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A., Yared. P. (2009). Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 1043—1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.10.002Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A., Yared. P. (2009). Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 1043—1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.10.002Allen D. (2011). The institutional revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Allen D. (2011). The institutional revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Bates R. (1983). Essays on the political economy of rural Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bates R. (1983). Essays on the political economy of rural Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Berman S. (2013). Ideational theorizing in the social sciences since ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state’. Governance, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 217—237. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12008Berman S. (2013). Ideational theorizing in the social sciences since ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state’. Governance, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 217—237. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12008Boldrin M., Levine D. K., Modica S. (2012). A review of Acemoglu and Robinson’s “Why nations fail”. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.dklevine.com/general/aandrreview.pdfBoldrin M., Levine D. K., Modica S. (2012). A review of Acemoglu and Robinson’s “Why nations fail”. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.dklevine.com/general/aandrreview.pdfBoyd R., Richerson P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Boyd R., Richerson P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Boyd R., Richerson P. J. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Boyd R., Richerson P. J. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Cowen T. (2011). The great stagnation: How America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. New York: Penguin Group.Cowen T. (2011). The great stagnation: How America ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (eventually) feel better. New York: Penguin Group.Cox G. W., North D. C., Weingast B. (2015). The violence trap: A political-economic approach to the problems of development. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2370622Cox G. W., North D. C., Weingast B. (2015). The violence trap: A political-economic approach to the problems of development. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2370622Crafts N. (2005). The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the slow growth/rapid industrialization paradox. Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 3, No. 2—3, pp. 525—534. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.525Crafts N. (2005). The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the slow growth/rapid industrialization paradox. Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 3, No. 2—3, pp. 525—534. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.525Deakin S. (2009). Legal origin, juridical form and industrialization in historical perspective: The case of the employment contract and the joint-stock company. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 35—65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn019Deakin S. (2009). Legal origin, juridical form and industrialization in historical perspective: The case of the employment contract and the joint-stock company. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 35—65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwn019Eisenstadt Sh. N. (1973). Traditional patrimonialism and modern neopatrimonialism. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Eisenstadt Sh. N. (1973). Traditional patrimonialism and modern neopatrimonialism. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Goldstone J. A. (2002). Efflorescences and economic growth in world history: Rethinking the ‘rise of the west’ and the Industrial Revolution. Journal of World History, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 323—389. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2002.0034Goldstone J. A. (2002). Efflorescences and economic growth in world history: Rethinking the ‘rise of the west’ and the Industrial Revolution. Journal of World History, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 323—389. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2002.0034Greif A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Greif A. (2006). Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Greif A., Mokyr J. (2016). Institutions and economic history: A critique of professor McCloskey. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 29—41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000417Greif A., Mokyr J. (2016). Institutions and economic history: A critique of professor McCloskey. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 29—41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000417Jones Ch. I. (2005). Growth and Ideas. In: Ph. Aghion, S. Durlauf (eds.). Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, pp. 1063—1111.Jones Ch. I. (2005). Growth and Ideas. In: Ph. Aghion, S. Durlauf (eds.). Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 1. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, pp. 1063—1111.Kang D. C. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 57—85. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090Kang D. C. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 57—85. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090Lipset S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 69—105.Lipset S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 69—105.McCloskey D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.McCloskey D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.McCloskey D. N. (2016). The humanities are scientific: A reply to the defenses of economic neo-institutionalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 63—78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000430McCloskey D. N. (2016). The humanities are scientific: A reply to the defenses of economic neo-institutionalism. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 63—78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000430Mokyr J. (2010). Culture, institutions, and modern growth. Paper presented at the Conference on Understanding Institutions and Development Economics: The Legacy and Work of Douglass C. North. https://archive.econ.msu.ru/ext/lib/Category/x0c/xe4/3300/file/2_(2)_Joel_Mokyr.pdfMokyr J. (2010). Culture, institutions, and modern growth. Paper presented at the Conference on Understanding Institutions and Development Economics: The Legacy and Work of Douglass C. North. https://archive.econ.msu.ru/ext/lib/Category/x0c/xe4/3300/file/2_(2)_Joel_Mokyr.pdfMukand S., Rodrik D. (2018). The political economy of ideas: On ideas versus interests in policymaking. NBER Working Paper, No. 24467.Mukand S., Rodrik D. (2018). The political economy of ideas: On ideas versus interests in policymaking. NBER Working Paper, No. 24467.Murrell P. (2017). Design and evolution in institutional development: The insignificance of the English Bill of Rights. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 36—55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.08.007Murrell P. (2017). Design and evolution in institutional development: The insignificance of the English Bill of Rights. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 36—55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.08.007North D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 97—112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97North D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 97—112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97North D. C., Thomas R. P. (1973). The rise of the Western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.North D. C., Thomas R. P. (1973). The rise of the Western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Ogilvie Sh., Carus A. W. (2014). Institutions and economic growth in historical perspective. Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 2A. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, pp. 403—513.Ogilvie Sh., Carus A. W. (2014). Institutions and economic growth in historical perspective. Handbook of economic growth, Vol. 2A. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier, pp. 403—513.Schumpeter J. A. (1949). Science and ideology. American Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 345—359.Schumpeter J. A. (1949). Science and ideology. American Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 345—359.Swedberg R. (2009). Tocqueville’s political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Swedberg R. (2009). Tocqueville’s political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Treisman D. (2017). Democracy by mistake. NBER Working Paper, No. 23944.Treisman D. (2017). Democracy by mistake. NBER Working Paper, No. 23944.Weingast B. R. (2016). Exposing the neoclassical fallacy: McCloskey on ideas and the Great Enrichment. Scandinavian Economic History Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 189—201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2016.1233134Weingast B. R. (2016). Exposing the neoclassical fallacy: McCloskey on ideas and the Great Enrichment. Scandinavian Economic History Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 189—201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.2016.1233134

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.