References

voprecotest

Вопросы экономики

Voprosy Ekonomiki

0042-8736

Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP

10.32609/0042-8736-2019-5-26-45

voprecotest-2201

Research Article

ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ

ISSUES OF THEORY

Идеи и интересы, экономическая политика и институты

Ideas and interests, economic policy and institutions

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0667-3391

Тамбовцев

В. Л.

Tambovtsev

Vitaly L.

Тамбовцев Виталий Леонидович, д. э. н., проф. экономического факультета

Москва

Moscow

vitalytambovtsev@gmail.com

МГУ имени М. В. ЛомоносоваРоссияLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian Federation

2019

07052019

052645

2019

Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP

https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice

https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2201

В последние годы в анализе экономической политики возникло направление исследований, сторонники которого стремятся доказать, что идеи оказывают не только значительное, но и определяющее (причинное) влияние на экономическую политику и экономические институты и в конечном счете — на экономические процессы. Цель этой статьи — проанализировать выдвигаемые аргументы в пользу влияния идей на экономику, оценить их обоснованность, выявить сильные и слабые стороны указанного подхода. В силу широты охвата им различных сторон функционирования экономики в данной работе будут рассмотрены только две темы: влияние идей на экономическую политику и ее изменения и воздействие идей на институты и институциональные изменения.

In recent years an approach has appeared in economic policy analysis, the followers of which try to argue that ideas not only matter but cause economic policies and economic institutions change, and after all cause change in economies: an ideational approach. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the approach’s argumentations, estimate its validity, reveal strengths and weaknesses. Whereas this approach embraces many different aspects of economic processes, this paper turns attention to only two issues: ideas’ influence on policies and policies change, and the role of ideas in institutional change.

идеиинститутыэкономическая политика

ideasinstitutionseconomic policy

References1

Веблен Т. (1984). Теория праздного класса. М.: Прогресс.

Veblen T. (1984). Theory of leisure class. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Вольчик В. В., Маслюкова Е. В. (2018). Нарративы, идеи, институты // Terra Economicus. Т. 16, № 2. С. 150—168.

Volchik V. V., Maslyukova E. V. (2018). Narratives, ideas, institutions. Terra Economicus, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 150—168. (In Russian).

Ефимов В. (2007). Предмет и метод интерпретативной институциональной экономики // Вопросы экономики. № 8. C. 49—67. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-8-49-67

Еfimov V. (2007). Subject matter and method of interpretive institutional economics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 8, pp. 49—67. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2007-8-49-67

Ефимов В. М. (2011). Дискурсивный анализ в экономике: пересмотр методологии и истории экономической науки // Вопросы регулирования экономики. Т. 2, № 3. С. 5—79.

Еfimov V. M. (2011). Discursive economics: Methodology and history of economics reconsidered. Journal of Economic Regulation, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 5—79. (In Russian).

Малинова О. Ю. (2010). Идеи как независимые переменные в политических исследованиях: в поисках адекватной методологии // Полис. № 3. С. 90—99.

Malinova O. Yu. (2010). Ideas as independent variables in the political researches: In search of relevant methodology. Polis, No. 3, pp. 90—99. (In Russian).

Патрушев С. В. (2009). Институциональная политология: четверть века спустя // Политическая наука. № 3. С. 5—19.

Patrushev S. V. (2009). Institutional political science: A quarter of a century later. Politicheskaya Nauka, No. 3, pp. 5—19. (In Russian).

Салтыков Б. Г., Тамбовцев В. Л. (1973). К проблеме построения дерева целей социально-экономической системы // Экономика и математические методы. Т. 9, Вып. 6. С. 1029—1038.

Saltykov B. G., Tambovtsev V. L. (1973). Toward the problem of social-economic system objectives tree formation. Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody, Vol. 9, Iss. 6, pp. 1029—1038. (In Russian).

Фельдбаум А. А. (1960). Теория дуального управления. I // Автоматика и телемеханика. Т. 21, Вып. 9. С. 1240—1249.

Feldbaum A. A. (1960). Dual control theory. I. Automatika i Telemekhanika, Vol. 21, Iss. 9, pp. 1240—1249. (In Russian).

Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179—211.

Ambrosino A., Fiori S. (2019). Ideologies and beliefs in Douglass North’s theory. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought(forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2018.1523209

Ambrosino A., Fontana M., Gigante A. A. (2018). Shifting boundaries in economics: The institutional cognitive strand and the future of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 767—791.

Axelrod R., Keohane R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 226—254.

Barbier J. C. (2011). „Employment precariousness“ in a European cross-national perspective. A sociological review of thirty years of research. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne, No. 2011.78.

Batista M. da G., Clegg S., Pina e Cunha M., Giustiniano L., Rego A. (2016). Improvising prescription: Evidence from the emergency room. British Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 406—425.

Béland D., Cox R. H. (2011). Introduction: Ideas and politics. In: D. Béland, R. H. Cox (eds.). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3—20.

Bell S. (2011). Do we really need a new ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to explain institutional change? British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 883—906.

Bell S. (2012). Where are the i nstitutions? The li mits of Vivien Schmidt’s constructivism . British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 714—719.

Bennett K. (2007). Mental causation.Philosophy Compass, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 316—337.

Berman S. (2001). Review: Ideas, norms, and culture in political analysis. Comparative Politics, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 231—250.

Blyth M. M. (1997). „Any more bright ideas?“ The ideational turn in comparative political economy. Comparative Politics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 229—250.

Boyer P., Petersen M. B. (2012). The naturalness of (many) social institutions: Evolved cognition as their foundation. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1—25.

Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1—34.

Budzinski O. (2003). Cognitive rules, institutions, and competition. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 213—233.

Campbell J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 377—409.

Campbell J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 28, pp. 21—38.

Cerna L. (2013). The nature of policy change and implementation: A review of different theoretical approaches. OECD/CERI paper. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/The%20Nature%20of%20Policy%20Change%20and%20Implementation.pdf

Coccia M. (2018). An introduction to the theories of institutional change. Journal of Economics Library, Vol. 5, No. 4, рp. 337—344.

Daigneault P.-M. (2014). Reassessing the concept of policy paradigm: Aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 453—469.

Darriet E., Bourgeois-Gironde S. (2015). Why lay social representations of the economy should count in economics. Mind & Society, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 245—258.

Davis F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319—340.

DellaPosta D., Nee V., Opper S. (2017). Endogenous dynamics of institutional change. Rationality and Society, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 5—48.

Denzau A. T., North D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos, Vol. 47, No. 1, рр. 3—31.

Eggertsson T. (2009). Knowledge and the theory of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 137—150.

Eleveld A. (2016). The role of ideas in policy and institutional change: A comparison of the open functional approach, constructivism and discourse theory. Political Studies, Vol. 64, No. 1S, pp. 70—87.

Ezzamel M., Robson K., Stapleton P., McLean C. (2007). Discourse and institutional change: “Giving accounts” and accountability. Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 150—171.

Fried I., Haggard P., He B. J., Schurger A. (2017). Volition and action in the human brai n: Processes, pathologies, and reasons. Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 37, No. 45, рр. 10842—10847.

Gigante A. A. (2013). Institutional cognitive economics: Some recent developments. MPRA Paper, No. 48278.

Glückler J., Suddaby R., Lenz R. (eds.) (2018). Knowledge and institutions. Cham: Springer.

Gofas A., Hay C. (2010). Varieties of ideational explanations. In: A. Gofas, C. Hay (eds.). The role of ideas in political analysis. A portrait of contemporary debates. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 13—55.

Goldstei n J. (1989). The i mpact of ideas on trade policy: The origi ns of U. S. agricultural and manufacturing policies. International Organization, Vol. 43, No. 1, рр. 31—71.

Goldstein J., Keohane R. O. (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: An analytical framework. In: J. Goldstein, R. O. Keohane (eds.). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 3—30.

Goodin R. E., Tilly C. (eds.) (2006). Oxford handbook of contextual political analysi s. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Greif A., Mokyr J. (2017). Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25—52.

Haas M. R., Criscuolo P., George G. (2015). Which problems to solve? Onli ne knowledge sharing and attention allocation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 680—711.

Haas P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1—35.

Hall P. A. (1989). Conclusion: The politics of Keynesian ideas. In: P. A. Hall (ed.). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 360—391.

Hall P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 275—296.

Ham M., Jeger M., Frajman IvkovićA. (2015). The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Economic Research—Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 738—748.

Hannah A. (2018). Rethinking the ‘open functional’ approach: Ideas, problem pressure and reform i n the contemporary welfare state. Public Administration, Vol. 96, No. 3, рр. 528—543.

Hansen R., King D. (2001). Eugenic ideas, political interests, and policy variance: Immigration and sterilization policy in Britain and the US. World Politics, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 237—263.

Harrington B. (2015). Going global: Professionals and the micro-foundations of insti tutional change. Journal of Professions and Organization, Vol. 2, No. 2, рр. 103—121.

Herrmann R. (1988). The empirical challenge of the cognitive revolution: A strategy for drawing inferences about perceptions. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 175—203.

Horn A., Kevi ns A. (2018). Problem pressure and social policy i nnovation: Lessons from nineteenth-century Germany. Social Science History, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 495—515.

Howe R. B. K. (1994). The cognitive nature of desire. Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 32, No. 2, рр. 179—196.

Iyigun M., Rubin J. (2017). The ideological roots of institutional change. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10703.

Jacobsen J. K. (1995). Much ado about ideas: The cognitive factor in economic policy. World Politics, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 283—310.

Jakobsen M. L. F. (2016). Uncertainty, ideas, and institutional reform. Acta Politica, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 102—121.

Jervis R. (1988). Realism, game theory, and cooperation. World Politics,Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 317—349.

Jobert B. (1989). The normative frameworks of public policy. Political Studies, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 376—386.

Katzenstein P. J. (ed.) (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kerber W., Vanberg V. (1995). Competition among institutions: Evolution within constrains. In: L. Gerken (ed.). Competition among institutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35—64.

Knight J., North D. (1997). Explaining economic change: The interplay between cognition and institutions. Legal Theory, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 211—226.

Lane R. (1992). Political culture: Residual category or general theory? Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 362—387.

Larsen C. A., Andersen J. G. (2009). How new economic ideas changed the Danish welfare state: The case of neoliberal ideas and highly organized social democratic interests. Governance, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 239—261.

Levy D. J., Glimcher P. W. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1027—1038.

Lieberman R. (2002). Ideas, i nstitutions and political order: Explai ni ng political change. American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 697—712.

Lindenberg S. (1998). The cognitive turn in institutional analysis: Beyond NIE and NIS? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 154, No. 4, pp. 716—727.

Lipshitz R., Klein G., Orasanu J., Salas E. (2001). Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 331—352.

Lumsdaine D. H. (1993). Moral vi sion in international politics: The foreign aid regime, 1949—1989. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Mantzavinos C., North D. C., Shariq S. (2004). Learning, institutions, and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 75—84.

Markey-Towler B. (2019). The competition and evolution of ideas in the public sphere: A new foundation for institutional theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 27—48.

Martens B. (2004). The cognitive mechanics of economic development and institutional change. London, New York: Routledge.

Maslow A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 370—396.

Mehta J. (2011). The varied roles of ideas in politics: From “whether” to “how”. In: D. Béland, R. H. Cox (eds.). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23—46.

Mueller P. A., Solan L. M., Darley J. M. (2012). When does knowledge become intent? Perceiving the minds of wrongdoers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 859—892.

North D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

North D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

North D. C., Wallis J. J., Weingast B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ocasio W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 187—206.

Parsons C. (2002). Showing ideas as causes: The origins of the European Union. International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 47—84.

Patalano R. (2007). Imagination and society. The affective side of institutions. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 223—241.

Patalano R. (2010). Understanding economic change: The impact of emotion. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 270—287.

Pohl R. F. (ed.) (2004). Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory. New York: Psychology Press.

Rizzello S., Turvani M. (2000). Institutions meet mind: The way out of a deadlock. Constitutional Political Economy,Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165—180.

Rizzello S., Turvani M. (2002). Subjective diversity and social learning: A cognitive perspective for understanding institutional behavior. Constitutional Political Economy, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 197—210.

Rodrik D. (2014). When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 189—208.

Roe E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, CT: Duke University Press.

Sanoja P. (2009). Ideology, institutions and ideas: Explaining political change in Venezuela. Bulletin of Latin American Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 394—410.

Schmidt V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 11, pp. 303—326.

Schmidt V. (2010a). Analysing ideas and tracing discursive interactions in institutional change: From historical institutionalism to discursive institutionalism. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2—5.

Schmidt V. (2010b). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “New Institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1—25.

Schmidt V. A., Radaelli C. M. (2004). Policy change and discourse i n Europe: Conceptual and methodological issues. West European Politics, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 183—210.

Schroeder T. (2010). Desire: Philosophical issues. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 363—370.

Smets M., Morris T., Greenwood R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 877—904.

Soon C. S., Brass M., Heinze H.-J., Haynes J.-D. (2008). Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 543—545.

Srite M., Karahanna E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technolo gy acceptance. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 679—704.

Staden P. von, Bruce K. (2015). Original and new institutional economics: Brethren rather than foes? Lessons from the sociocognitive turn in “late” Douglass North. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 111—125.

Storr V. H. (2009). North’s underdeveloped ideological entrepreneur. In: E. Chamlee-Wright (ed.). Annual proceedings of the wealth and well-being of nations, Vol. 1. Beloit, WI: Beloit College Press, pp. 99—115.

Streit M. E., Mummert U., Kiwit D. (eds.) (2000). Cognition, rationality, and institutions. Berlin: Springer.

100

Taffesse A., Tadesse F. (2017). Pathways less explored — Locus of control and technology adoption. Journal of African Economies, Vol. 26, No. suppl_1, August, pp. i36—i72.

101

Teraji S. (2018). The cognitive basis of institutions: A synthesis of behavioral and institutional economics. London: Academic Press.

102

Thomas W. I., Thomas D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs.New York: Knopf.

103

Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186—204.

104

Vis B., Van Kersbergen K. (2013). Towards an open functional approach to welfare state change: Pressures, ideas, and blame avoidance. Public Administration, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 840—854.

105

Walsh J. I. (2000). When do ideas matter? Explaining the success and failures of Thatcherite ideas. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 483—516.

106

Wendt A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

107

Yee A. S. (1996). The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 69—108.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.