<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-91-106</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-2167</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИСКУССИОННЫЙ КЛУБ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DEBATING SOCIETY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Экономическое неравенство — вселенское зло?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Is economic inequality a universal evil?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-2110</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Капелюшников</surname><given-names>Р. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kapeliushnikov</surname><given-names>Rostislav I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Капелюшников Ростислав Исаакович, чл.-корр. РАН, д. э. н., гл. н. с.; замдиректора Центра трудовых исследований НИУ ВШЭ</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">rostis@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский институт мировой экономики и международных отношений имени Е. М. Примакова РАН; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS; Centre for Labour Market Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>04</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2167">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2167</self-uri><abstract><p>В работе на примере двух стран — США и России — показано, что в настоящее время статистические измерения неравенства не дают однозначных результатов. При столь шаткой основе попытки выносить безапелляционные нормативные суждения и давать рекомендации правительствам выглядят как минимум преждевременными. Более того, сама общепринятая практика делать нормативные выводы исходя из количественных показателей неравенства этически некорректна, поскольку «обычные» люди (не интеллектуалы) склонны судить о приемлемости/неприемлемости богатства и доходов не по тому, насколько они малы или велики, а по тому, как они были получены, — с нарушением или без нарушений правил «честной игры». Сделан вывод, что всемирная кампания по «борьбе» с неравенством организована левыми интеллектуалами с целью еще более усилить свою дискурсивную власть над современным обществом.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Using published estimates of inequality for two countries (Russia and USA) the paper demonstrates that inequality measuring still remains in the state of “statistical cacophony”. Under this condition, it seems at least untimely to pass categorical normative judgments and offer radical political advice for governments. Moreover, the mere practice to draw normative conclusions from quantitative data is ethically invalid since ordinary people (non-intellectuals) tend to evaluate wealth and incomes as admissible or inadmissible not on the basis of their size but basing on whether they were obtained under observance or violations of the rules of “fair play”. The paper concludes that a current large-scale ideological campaign of “struggle against inequality” has been unleashed by left-wing intellectuals in order to strengthen even more their discursive power over the public.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>неравенство</kwd><kwd>доходы</kwd><kwd>богатство</kwd><kwd>этика</kwd><kwd>идеология</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>inequality</kwd><kwd>income</kwd><kwd>wealth</kwd><kwd>ethics</kwd><kwd>ideology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Auten G., Splinter D. (2018). Income inequality in the United States: Using tax data to measure long-term trends. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Taxation.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Auten G., Splinter D. (2018). Income inequality in the United States: Using tax data to measure long-term trends. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Taxation.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Calvo P. A., Lopez-Calva L.-F., Posad J. (2015). A decade of decli ni ng earni ngs i nequality in the Russian Federation. Policy Research Working Paper, No. WPS 7392. Washington , DC: World Bank Group.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Calvo P. A., Lopez-Calva L.-F., Posad J. (2015). A decade of decli ni ng earni ngs i nequality in the Russian Federation. Policy Research Working Paper, No. WPS 7392. Washington , DC: World Bank Group.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">CBO (2016). The distribution of household income and federal taxes, 2013. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/51361</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">CBO (2016). The distribution of household income and federal taxes, 2013. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/51361</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Early J. F. (2018). Reassessing the facts about inequality, poverty, and redistribution. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 839. Washington , DC: Cato Institute. https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-839-updated-2.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Early J. F. (2018). Reassessing the facts about inequality, poverty, and redistribution. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 839. Washington , DC: Cato Institute. https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa-839-updated-2.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lindert P. H. (2017). Rise and future of progressive redistribution. CEQ Working Paper, No. 73. Tulane: CEQ Institute.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lindert P. H. (2017). Rise and future of progressive redistribution. CEQ Working Paper, No. 73. Tulane: CEQ Institute.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milanovic B. (2012). Global income inequality by the numbers: In history and now. An overview. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6259. Washington , DC: World Bank Group.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milanovic B. (2012). Global income inequality by the numbers: In history and now. An overview. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6259. Washington , DC: World Bank Group.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Milanovic B. (2017). Inequality in the age of globalization. Lecture in Honor of Anthony A. Atkinson. Brussels: Annual Research Conference, Brussels, 20 November. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/00.keynote_milanovic.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Milanovic B. (2017). Inequality in the age of globalization. Lecture in Honor of Anthony A. Atkinson. Brussels: Annual Research Conference, Brussels, 20 November. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/00.keynote_milanovic.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novokmet F., Piketty T., Zucman G. (2017). From Soviets to oligarchs: Inequality and property in Russia, 1905—2016. WID.world Working Paper, No. 2016/02. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/NPZ2017WIDworld.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novokmet F., Piketty T., Zucman G. (2017). From Soviets to oligarchs: Inequality and property in Russia, 1905—2016. WID.world Working Paper, No. 2016/02. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/NPZ2017WIDworld.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">OECD (2018). Income Inequality (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/inequality/income-inequality.htm.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">OECD (2018). Income Inequality (indicator). https://data.oecd.org/inequality/income-inequality.htm.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. (2018). Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 519—578.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. (2018). Distributional national accounts: Methods and estimates for the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 519—578.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
