voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2019-2-97-113voprecotest-2145Research ArticleМАКРОЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯMACROECONOMIC RESEARCHВнешние эффекты от прямых иностранных инвестиций в российской экономике: результаты эмпирического анализаForeign direct investment spillovers in the Russian economy: The results of empirical estimationhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-8463ДрапкинИ. М.DrapkinI. M.

Драпкин Игорь Михайлович, д. э. н., проф. кафедры международной экономики и менеджмента 

Екатеринбург

Igor M. Drapkin

Yekaterinburg

i.m.drapkin@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-1533ЛукьяновС. А.LukyanovS. A.

Sergey A. Lukyanov

 

Уральский федеральный университет имени первого Президента России Б. Н. ЕльцинаРоссияUral Federal UniversityRussian FederationГосударственный университет управления; Санкт-Петербургский государственный университетРоссияState University of Management; St. Petersburg State UniversityRussian Federation2019070220190297113Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20192019Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2145

В статье рассматриваются эффекты, возникающие в российской экономике в результате притока прямых иностранных инвестиций (ПИИ). В центре внимания — внешние эффекты, то есть влияние компаний с ПИИ на российские национальные компании. На основе эмпирической оценки данных по 29 817 промышленным предприятиям России за 2006—2014 гг. показано, что внутриотраслевые и межотраслевые эффекты от покупателя к поставщику имеют нелинейную U-образную форму зависимости, а межотраслевые эффекты от поставщика к покупателю линейны и имеют отрицательный знак. Более сильные внешние эффекты от ПИИ выявлены в регионах с более высоким качеством человеческого капитала, а также в регионах с более высоким уровнем инновационной активности.

The paper is devoted to the foreign direct investment (FDI) spillovers in the Russian economy. Using the database on 29,817 Russian enterprises for the period of 2006—2014, we empirically estimate FDI spillovers on both intra-industry and inter-industry levels. We show that the intra-industry effects and upstream inter-industry effects have the non-linear U-shape dependence on the share of foreign companies in the industry, while downstream inter-industry effects are linear and negative. Analysing regional factors influencing FDI spillovers in the Russian economy, we find stronger effects in the regions with higher level of human capital and higher level of innovation activity. We do not find the proof for the hypothesis that FDI spillovers are stronger in the western part of Russia comparing to the eastern part.

прямые иностранные инвестициивнешние эффекты от прямых иностранных инвестицийроссийские промышленные предприятияforeign direct investmentspillovershorizontal FDI spilloversvertical FDI spilloversРФФИ (проект № 18-010-01190)the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 18-010-01190)ReferencesКадочников С. М., Драпкин И. М., Давидсон Н. Б., Федюнина А. А. (2011). Эффективность национальных компаний и диверсификация промышленности региона как факторы внешних эффектов от прямых зарубежных инвестиций в российской экономике // Российский журнал менеджмента. Т. 9. № 2. С. 3—26.Kadochnikov S. M., Drapkin I. M., Davidson N. B., Fedyunina A. A. (2011). Spillover effects from foreign direct investment in the Russian economy: the impact of effectiveness of national companies and economic diversification in regions. Russian Journal of Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 3—26. (In Russian).Кадочников С. М., Федюнина А. А. (2017). Влияние компаний с иностранными инвестициями на экспортную активность российских фирм: размер имеет значение // Вопросы экономики. № 12. С. 96—119. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-12-96-119Kadochnikov S. M., Fedyunina A. A. (2017). The impact of foreign direct investment on export activity of Russian firms: The size matters. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 12, pp. 96—119. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-12-96-119Лукьянов С. А., Драпкин И. М. (2017). Глобальные цепочки создания стоимости: эффекты для интегрирующейся экономики // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 4 (61). С. 14—23.Lukyanov S. A., Drapkin I. M. (2017). Gloval value chains: effects for the integrating economy. World Economy and International Relations, No. 4 (61), pp. 14—23. (In Russian).Abraham F., Konings J., Slootmaekers V. (2010). FDI Spillovers, Firm Heterogeneity and Degree of Ownership: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing. Economics of Transition, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 143—182.Abraham F., Konings J., Slootmaekers V. (2010). FDI Spillovers, Firm Heterogeneity and Degree of Ownership: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing. Economics of Transition, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 143—182.Aitken B., Harrison A. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 605—618.Aitken B., Harrison A. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 605—618.Altomonte C., Resmini L. (2001). Multi national corporations as a catalyst for i ndustrial development: the case of Poland. Bocconi University Working Paper, No. 368.Altomonte C., Resmini L. (2001). Multi national corporations as a catalyst for i ndustrial development: the case of Poland. Bocconi University Working Paper, No. 368.Batra G., Morisset J., Saggi K. (2003). Vertical linkages between multinationals and domestic suppliers: whom do they benefit and why? World Bank Working Paper, No. 44.Batra G., Morisset J., Saggi K. (2003). Vertical linkages between multinationals and domestic suppliers: whom do they benefit and why? World Bank Working Paper, No. 44.Djankov S., Hoekman B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 49—64.Djankov S., Hoekman B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 49—64.Findlay R. (1978). Some aspects of technology transfer and direct foreign investment. American Economic Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 275—279.Findlay R. (1978). Some aspects of technology transfer and direct foreign investment. American Economic Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 275—279.Görg H., Strobl E. (2001). Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A metaanalysis with a test for publication bias. Economic Journal, Vol. 111, No. 475, pp. 723—739.Görg H., Strobl E. (2001). Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A metaanalysis with a test for publication bias. Economic Journal, Vol. 111, No. 475, pp. 723—739.Griffith R., Simpson H. (2003). Characteristics of foreign-owned firms in British manufacturing. NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper, No. 9573.Griffith R., Simpson H. (2003). Characteristics of foreign-owned firms in British manufacturing. NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper, No. 9573.Haddad M., Harrison A. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from foreign direct investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 51—74.Haddad M., Harrison A. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from foreign direct investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 51—74.Harrison A. (1996). Determinants and effects of direct foreign investment in Cote d’Ivoire, Morocco, and Venezuela. In: Roberts M., Tybout J. (eds.) Industrial evolution in developing countries: micro patterns or turnover, productivity and market structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Harrison A. (1996). Determinants and effects of direct foreign investment in Cote d’Ivoire, Morocco, and Venezuela. In: Roberts M., Tybout J. (eds.) Industrial evolution in developing countries: micro patterns or turnover, productivity and market structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Haskel J., Pereira S., Slaughter M. (2007). Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 482—496.Haskel J., Pereira S., Slaughter M. (2007). Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 482—496.Kinoshita Y. (2000). R&D and technology spillovers via FDI: innovation and absorptive capacity. University of Michigan Business School Working Paper, No. 349a.Kinoshita Y. (2000). R&D and technology spillovers via FDI: innovation and absorptive capacity. University of Michigan Business School Working Paper, No. 349a.Kneller R., Pisu M. (2007). Industrial linkages and export spillovers from FDI. The World Economy, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 105—134.Kneller R., Pisu M. (2007). Industrial linkages and export spillovers from FDI. The World Economy, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 105—134.Kokko A., Zejan M., Tansini R. (2001). Trade regimes and spillover effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 137, pp. 124—149.Kokko A., Zejan M., Tansini R. (2001). Trade regimes and spillover effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 137, pp. 124—149.Konings J. (2001). The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms: evidence from firm level panel data in emerging economies. Economics of Transition, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 619—633.Konings J. (2001). The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms: evidence from firm level panel data in emerging economies. Economics of Transition, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 619—633.Markusen J., Venables A. (1999). Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. European Economic Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 335—356.Markusen J., Venables A. (1999). Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. European Economic Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 335—356.Matouschek N., Venables A. (2005). Evaluating investment projects in the presence of sectoral linkages. Economics of Transition, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 573—603.Matouschek N., Venables A. (2005). Evaluating investment projects in the presence of sectoral linkages. Economics of Transition, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 573—603.Mühlen H. (2013). Firm-level productivity spillovers from FDI in Latin American countries. IEE Working Papers, No. 196.Mühlen H. (2013). Firm-level productivity spillovers from FDI in Latin American countries. IEE Working Papers, No. 196.Musin J., Tomsik V. (2002). Does foreign direct investment crowd in or crowd out domestic investment? Eastern European Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 38—56.Musin J., Tomsik V. (2002). Does foreign direct investment crowd in or crowd out domestic investment? Eastern European Economics, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 38—56.Prönca I., Fontoura M., Crespo N. (2000). Productivity spillovers from multinational corporations in the Portuguese case: evidence from a short time period panel data. Mimeo, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa.Prönca I., Fontoura M., Crespo N. (2000). Productivity spillovers from multinational corporations in the Portuguese case: evidence from a short time period panel data. Mimeo, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa.Ruane F., Ugur A. (2002). Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in Irish Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from firm level panel data. Trinity Economic Papers, No. 06. Dublin, Trinity College.Ruane F., Ugur A. (2002). Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in Irish Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from firm level panel data. Trinity Economic Papers, No. 06. Dublin, Trinity College.Sabirianova K., Svejnar J., Terrell K. (2005). Distance to the efficiency frontier and FDI spillovers. Journal of European Economic Association, Vol. 3, No. 2-3, pp. 576—586.Sabirianova K., Svejnar J., Terrell K. (2005). Distance to the efficiency frontier and FDI spillovers. Journal of European Economic Association, Vol. 3, No. 2-3, pp. 576—586.Schoors K., Tol B. van der. (2002). Foreign direct investment spillovers within and between sectors: Evidence from Hungarian data. Gent University Working Paper, No. 157.Schoors K., Tol B. van der. (2002). Foreign direct investment spillovers within and between sectors: Evidence from Hungarian data. Gent University Working Paper, No. 157.Smarzynska B. (2004). Does foreign di rect i nvestment i ncrease the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 605—627.Smarzynska B. (2004). Does foreign di rect i nvestment i ncrease the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 605—627.Torlak E. (2004). Foreign direct investment, technology transfer, and productivity growth in transition countries — empirical evidence from panel data. Cege Discussion Paper, No. 26.Torlak E. (2004). Foreign direct investment, technology transfer, and productivity growth in transition countries — empirical evidence from panel data. Cege Discussion Paper, No. 26.Wang M. (2009). Manufacturi ng FDI and economic growth: evidence from Asian economies. Applied Economics, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 991—1002.Wang M. (2009). Manufacturi ng FDI and economic growth: evidence from Asian economies. Applied Economics, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 991—1002.Yudaeva K., Kozlov K., Melentieva N., Ponomareva N. (2003). Does foreign ownership matter? The Russian experience. Economics of Transition, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 383—409.Yudaeva K., Kozlov K., Melentieva N., Ponomareva N. (2003). Does foreign ownership matter? The Russian experience. Economics of Transition, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 383—409.Zukowska-Gagelman K. (2000). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment in Poland. Economic Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 223—256.Zukowska-Gagelman K. (2000). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment in Poland. Economic Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 223—256.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.