voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2003-6-4-21voprecotest-2036Research ArticleВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИISSUES OF THEORYТипы и уровни правил в организациях, институтах и системахOrganizations, Institutions, Systems: Types and Levels of RulesШавансБ.ChavanceB.

профессор

Высшая школа социальных наук (EHESS)ФранцияSchool of Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (EHESS)France20032006200306421Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20032003Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2036

Автор отмечает, что понятие правил является общим для экономических теорий организации и институтов. В статье обсуждаются правила внутреннего распорядка предприятий по Коммонсу, характеристики спонтанного и организованного порядка по Хайеку, отличия формальных и неформальных институтов по Норту. Сопоставив эти теории, автор предлагает критический синтетический подход, призванный выразить индивидуальные и коллективные действия в контексте системы, интерпретирующей организации как иерархически упорядоченные совокупности частных правил, а институты - как более общие социальные правила длительного действия, прямо или косвенно формируемые государством.

The notion of rules is common to the economics of organization and the economics of institutions. The author analyses the concept of going concern by Commons, the spontaneous and organized order in Hayek's works, and North's distinction of formal and informal institutions. Comparing these three theories he proposes a synthetic and critical approach in trying to articulate individual and collective actions in a systemic framework where organizations are defined as collective and hierarchised ensembles of specific rules, and institutions as general and social rules with higher durability, directly or indirectly sanctioned by the state.

правилоинститутыорганизацияспонтанный порядокruleinstitutionsorganizationspontaneous orderReferencesBazzoli L. L’économie politique de John R. Commons. Essai sur l’institutionnalisme en sciences sociales. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1999.Bazzoli L. L’économie politique de John R. Commons. Essai sur l’institutionnalisme en sciences sociales. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1999.Bazzoli L., Kirat Th. La relation entre le droit et l’économie dans les traditions institutionnaliste et post-coasienne : enjeux pour l’analyse de l’évolution // Economies et Sociétés, 1999, vol. 34, No 1, janvier, p. 67-88.Bazzoli L., Kirat Th. La relation entre le droit et l’économie dans les traditions institutionnaliste et post-coasienne : enjeux pour l’analyse de l’évolution // Economies et Sociétés, 1999, vol. 34, No 1, janvier, p. 67-88.Boltanski, L., Thévenot, L. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard, 1991.Boltanski, L., Thévenot, L. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard, 1991.Boyer R. The Variety and Unequal Performance of Really Existing Markets: Farewell to Doctor Pangloss? In: Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. J. Hollingsworth, R. Boyer. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 55-93.Boyer R. The Variety and Unequal Performance of Really Existing Markets: Farewell to Doctor Pangloss? In: Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. J. Hollingsworth, R. Boyer. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 55-93.Buchanan, J. The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Buchanan, J. The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Chavance B. Hierarchical Forms and Coordination Problems in Socialist Systems // Industrial and Corporate Change, 1995, vol. 4, No 1, p. 271-291.Chavance B. Hierarchical Forms and Coordination Problems in Socialist Systems // Industrial and Corporate Change, 1995, vol. 4, No 1, p. 271-291.Chavance B. Le capitalisme et le socialisme comme espèces systémiques: formation, évolution et transformation. In: Capitalisme et socialisme en perspective. Evolution et transformations des systèmes économiques. Chavance B., Magnin E., Motamed-Nejad R., Sapir J. (eds.). Paris: La Découverte, 1999, p. 295-315.Chavance B. Le capitalisme et le socialisme comme espèces systémiques: formation, évolution et transformation. In: Capitalisme et socialisme en perspective. Evolution et transformations des systèmes économiques. Chavance B., Magnin E., Motamed-Nejad R., Sapir J. (eds.). Paris: La Découverte, 1999, p. 295-315.Chavance B. Marx et le capitalisme. La dialectique d’un système. Paris: Nathan, 1996.Chavance B. Marx et le capitalisme. La dialectique d’un système. Paris: Nathan, 1996.Commons J. Institutional Economics // American Economic Review, 1931, vol. 21, December.Commons J. Institutional Economics // American Economic Review, 1931, vol. 21, December.Commons J. Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy. Vol. 2. New Brunswick and London, Transactions Publishers, 1990 [1934].Commons J. Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy. Vol. 2. New Brunswick and London, Transactions Publishers, 1990 [1934].Commons J. The Economics of Collective Action. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970 [1950].Commons J. The Economics of Collective Action. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970 [1950].Commons J. The Legal Foundations of Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1968 [1924].Commons J. The Legal Foundations of Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1968 [1924].Denzau, A., North, D. Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions // Kyklos, 1994, vol. 47, No 1, p. 3-31.Denzau, A., North, D. Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions // Kyklos, 1994, vol. 47, No 1, p. 3-31.Ellig J., Lavoie D. Government, Firms and the Impossibility of Central Planning. In: Economic Approaches to Organizations and Institutions. P. Foss (ed.). Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1995, p. 165-180.Ellig J., Lavoie D. Government, Firms and the Impossibility of Central Planning. In: Economic Approaches to Organizations and Institutions. P. Foss (ed.). Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1995, p. 165-180.Elster J. Social Norms and Economic Theory // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, vol. 3, Fall, p. 89-117.Elster J. Social Norms and Economic Theory // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, vol. 3, Fall, p. 89-117.Hamilton W. Institution. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. In: Seligman E., Johnson A. (eds.). vol. 8. London: Macmillan, 1932, Repr. in: The Economics of Institutions, p. 3-8.Hamilton W. Institution. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. In: Seligman E., Johnson A. (eds.). vol. 8. London: Macmillan, 1932, Repr. in: The Economics of Institutions, p. 3-8.Hayek F. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 1, Rules and Orders. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.Hayek F. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 1, Rules and Orders. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.Hayek F. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.Hayek F. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960.Hayek F. The Fatal Conceit. The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. (Рус. пер.: Хайек Ф. Пагубная самонадеянность. Ошибки социализма. М.: Новости при участии Cattalaxy, 1992ю)Hayek F. The Fatal Conceit. The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. (Рус. пер.: Хайек Ф. Пагубная самонадеянность. Ошибки социализма. М.: Новости при участии Cattalaxy, 1992ю)Hodgson G. The Ubiquity of Habits and Rules // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 21, No 6, p. 663-684.Hodgson G. The Ubiquity of Habits and Rules // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 21, No 6, p. 663-684.Khalil E. Institutional Theory of the Firm? Extension and Limitation // Review of Political Economy, 1995, vol. 7, No 1, p. 46-47.Khalil E. Institutional Theory of the Firm? Extension and Limitation // Review of Political Economy, 1995, vol. 7, No 1, p. 46-47.La Théorie de la régulation: l'état des saviors. Boyer R., Saillard Y. (eds.). Paris: La Découverte, 1995.La Théorie de la régulation: l'état des saviors. Boyer R., Saillard Y. (eds.). Paris: La Découverte, 1995.Lachman L. The Flow of Legislation and the Permanence of the Legal Order. In: Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions. London:Routledge, 1979, p. 253.Lachman L. The Flow of Legislation and the Permanence of the Legal Order. In: Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions. London:Routledge, 1979, p. 253.Langlois R. Do Firms Plan? // Constitutional Political Economy, 1995, vol. 6, No 2, p. 247-261.Langlois R. Do Firms Plan? // Constitutional Political Economy, 1995, vol. 6, No 2, p. 247-261.Les figures de l'irréversibilité en économie. Boyer R., Chavance B., Godard O. (eds.). Paris: Éditions de l'EHESS, 1991.Les figures de l'irréversibilité en économie. Boyer R., Chavance B., Godard O. (eds.). Paris: Éditions de l'EHESS, 1991.March J., Simon H. Organizations Revisited // Industrial and Corporate Change, 1993, vol. 3, No 2, p. 299-316.March J., Simon H. Organizations Revisited // Industrial and Corporate Change, 1993, vol. 3, No 2, p. 299-316.Nemo P. La société de droit selon F.A. Hayek. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.Nemo P. La société de droit selon F.A. Hayek. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.North D. Economic Performance through Time // American Economic Review, 1994, vol. 84, No 3, June, p. 360-361.North D. Economic Performance through Time // American Economic Review, 1994, vol. 84, No 3, June, p. 360-361.North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. (Рус. пер.: Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги «Начала», 1997.)North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. (Рус. пер.: Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд экономической книги «Начала», 1997.)North D. Institutions // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, No 1, Winter, p. 97-112.North D. Institutions // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, No 1, Winter, p. 97-112.Reynaud J.-D. Les règles du jeu. L'action collective et la régulation sociale, 2nd éd., Paris, A. Colin, 1993.Reynaud J.-D. Les règles du jeu. L'action collective et la régulation sociale, 2nd éd., Paris, A. Colin, 1993.Richter R. Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller, the Leader of Younger German Historical School, Seen With Neoinstitutionalist’s Eyes // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1996, vol. 152, No 4, December.Richter R. Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller, the Leader of Younger German Historical School, Seen With Neoinstitutionalist’s Eyes // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1996, vol. 152, No 4, December.Rowe N. Rules and Institutions. New York: Philip Allan, 1989.Rowe N. Rules and Institutions. New York: Philip Allan, 1989.Samuels W. Hayek from the Perspective of an Institutionalist Historian of Economic Thought: An Interpretive Essay // Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, 1999, vol. 9, No 2/3, juin-septembre, p. 279-290.Samuels W. Hayek from the Perspective of an Institutionalist Historian of Economic Thought: An Interpretive Essay // Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, 1999, vol. 9, No 2/3, juin-septembre, p. 279-290.Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Bros, 1942. (Рус. пер.: Шумпетер Й. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М., 1995.)Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Bros, 1942. (Рус. пер.: Шумпетер Й. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М., 1995.)Simon, H. Organizations and Markets // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, No 2, Spring, p. 25-44.Simon, H. Organizations and Markets // Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, No 2, Spring, p. 25-44.The Economics of Institutions. Hodgson, G. (ed.). Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993.The Economics of Institutions. Hodgson, G. (ed.). Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993.Vanberg V. Austrian School of Economics and the Evolution of Institutions. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. P. Newman (ed.). London: Macmillan, vol. 1, 1998.Vanberg V. Austrian School of Economics and the Evolution of Institutions. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. P. Newman (ed.). London: Macmillan, vol. 1, 1998.Vanberg V. Carl Menger's Evolutionary and John R. Commons' Collective Action Approach to Institutions: A Comparison // Review of Political Economy, 1989, vol. 3, No 1, November, p. 334-360.Vanberg V. Carl Menger's Evolutionary and John R. Commons' Collective Action Approach to Institutions: A Comparison // Review of Political Economy, 1989, vol. 3, No 1, November, p. 334-360.Vanberg V. Institutional Evolution through Purposeful Selection: The Constitutional Economics of John R. Commons // Constitutional Political Economy, 1997, vol. 8, No 2, p.105-122.Vanberg V. Institutional Evolution through Purposeful Selection: The Constitutional Economics of John R. Commons // Constitutional Political Economy, 1997, vol. 8, No 2, p.105-122.Vanberg V. Organizations as Constitutional Systems // Constitutional Political Economy, 1992, vol. 3, No 2.Vanberg V. Organizations as Constitutional Systems // Constitutional Political Economy, 1992, vol. 3, No 2.Vanberg V. Rules and Choice in Economics and Sociology. In: Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge, 1994, p. 11-24.Vanberg V. Rules and Choice in Economics and Sociology. In: Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge, 1994, p. 11-24.Vanberg, V. Organizations as Constitutional Systems // Constitutional Political Economy, 1992, vol. 3, No 2, p. 240-241.Vanberg, V. Organizations as Constitutional Systems // Constitutional Political Economy, 1992, vol. 3, No 2, p. 240-241.Wynarczyk P. Comparing Alleged Incommensurables: Institutional and Austrian Economics as Rivals and Possible Complements? // Review of Political Economy, 1992, vol. 4, No 1, p. 18-36.Wynarczyk P. Comparing Alleged Incommensurables: Institutional and Austrian Economics as Rivals and Possible Complements? // Review of Political Economy, 1992, vol. 4, No 1, p. 18-36.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.