<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2003-5-101-120</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-2033</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОБСТВЕННОСТЬ И КОРПОРАТИВНОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>OWNERSHIP AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Государственные пакеты акций в российских компаниях</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Federal State Shareholdings in Russian Companies</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Муравьев</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Muravyev</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>экономист-исследователь</p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Европейский университетский институт во Флоренции</institution><country>Италия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>European University Institute (EUI)</institution><country>Italy</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2003</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2003</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2003</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2003</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2033">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/2033</self-uri><abstract><p>В работе исследуется влияние государственных пакетов акций на результаты деятельности российских компаний. В центре анализа - компании смешанной формы собственности. Особое внимание уделено разным типам государственных пакетов акций, а также золотым акциям. Согласно данным эконометрического анализа, результаты деятельности компаний с участием государства в целом хуже, чем у типичной фирмы той же отрасли. Однако имеются четко выраженные различия в результатах деятельности компаний с различными типами государственных пакетов акций. Они, по всей видимости, объясняются неодинаковой степенью контроля федерального правительства над такими предприятиями. Сделан вывод, что государству не следует участвовать в компаниях, если для этого нет особых оснований. Выпуск золотых акций в стратегически важных компаниях является разумной альтернативой сохранению контроля над ними посредством владения акциями.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper studies the impact of federal state shareholdings on the performance of Russian companies. It focuses on mixed ownership companies rather than conventional state enterprises and distinguishes between several types of federal state shareholdings and golden shares. Econometric analysis shows that companies with state ownership generally perform worse than the average firm in terms of labour productivity and profitability. However, there are remarkable differences in the performance of companies with different types of state shareholdings. These differences are explained by different degrees of the federal state control over such enterprises. The paper concludes that the government should avoid keeping equity stakes in companies unless there is a necessity to retain them. Finally, the issue of golden shares in strategically important companies seems to be a reasonable alternative to retaining some control over them through equity ownership.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>государственный пакет акций</kwd><kwd>корпоративное управление</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>federal state shareholding</kwd><kwd>corporate governance</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Интервью с зам. председателя РФФИ В. Фатиковым // Известия, 2002, 12 февраля.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Интервью с зам. председателя РФФИ В. Фатиковым // Известия, 2002, 12 февраля.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Радыгин А., Мальгинов Г. Государственная собственность в российских корпорациях: проблемы эффективности управления и государственного регулирования. М.: ИЭПП, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Радыгин А., Мальгинов Г. Государственная собственность в российских корпорациях: проблемы эффективности управления и государственного регулирования. М.: ИЭПП, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Российская экономика в 2001 г.: тенденции и перспективы. М.: ИЭПП, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Российская экономика в 2001 г.: тенденции и перспективы. М.: ИЭПП, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Black B., Kraakman R., Tarassova A. Russian Privatisation and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? // Stanford Law Review, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black B., Kraakman R., Tarassova A. Russian Privatisation and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong? // Stanford Law Review, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cтиглиц Дж. Куда ведут реформы? (К десятилетию начала переходных процессов) // Вопросы экономики, 1999, № 7, с. 4-30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cтиглиц Дж. Куда ведут реформы? (К десятилетию начала переходных процессов) // Вопросы экономики, 1999, № 7, с. 4-30.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuznetsov P., Muravyev A. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in Russia: The Case of “Blue Chips” of the Stock Market. EERC working paper No 01/10. Moscow, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuznetsov P., Muravyev A. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in Russia: The Case of “Blue Chips” of the Stock Market. EERC working paper No 01/10. Moscow, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Muravyev A. Federal State Shareholdings in Russian Companies: Origin, Forms and Consequences for Enterprise Performance. BOFIT discussion paper No 12, 2002.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muravyev A. Federal State Shareholdings in Russian Companies: Origin, Forms and Consequences for Enterprise Performance. BOFIT discussion paper No 12, 2002.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nellis J. Time to Rethink Privatisation in Transition Economies? International Finance Corporation working paper No 38, 1999. World Bank</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nellis J. Time to Rethink Privatisation in Transition Economies? International Finance Corporation working paper No 38, 1999. World Bank</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Perevalov Y., Gimadi I., Dobrodey V. The Impact of Privatisation on the Performance of Medium and Large Industrial Enterprises. EERC working paper No 2K-01E. Moscow, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Perevalov Y., Gimadi I., Dobrodey V. The Impact of Privatisation on the Performance of Medium and Large Industrial Enterprises. EERC working paper No 2K-01E. Moscow, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pistor K., Turkewitz J. Coping with Hydra - State Ownership after Privatisation. Frydman R., Gray C., Rapaczynski A. (eds.). Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia. Budapest, Central European University Press, 1996, vol. 2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pistor K., Turkewitz J. Coping with Hydra - State Ownership after Privatisation. Frydman R., Gray C., Rapaczynski A. (eds.). Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia. Budapest, Central European University Press, 1996, vol. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shleifer A., Vishny R. A Theory of Privatisation // Economic Journal, 1996, vol. 106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shleifer A., Vishny R. A Theory of Privatisation // Economic Journal, 1996, vol. 106.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shleifer A., Vishny R. Politicians and Firms // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, vol. 109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shleifer A., Vishny R. Politicians and Firms // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, vol. 109.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stiglitz J. Whither Reform? Ten Years of Transition. Paper prepared for the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz J. Whither Reform? Ten Years of Transition. Paper prepared for the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vickers J., Yarrow G. Privatisation: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1990.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vickers J., Yarrow G. Privatisation: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1990.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
