voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2016-4-144-155voprecotest-193Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА АГРАРНОГО СЕКТОРАECONOMICS OF AGRICULTUREТехническая эффективность сельского хозяйства РоссииTechnical efficiency of the Russian agricultureКоротченяВ. М.KorotchenyaV.

к. э. н., завлабораторией разработки системы машин и технологий ФГБНУ «Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт механизации сельского хозяйства» (Москва)

valor99@gmail.comФГБНУ «Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт механизации сельского хозяйства»РоссияAll-Russian Research Institute of Mechanization for AgricultureRussian Federation20162004201604144155Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20162016Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/193

В статье на основе применения в межстрановом контексте методологии data envelopment analysis - с использованием подходов метаграницы и окна - дана оценка технической эффективности сельского хозяйства России. В группу включенных в исследование стран входят члены СНГ, БРИК, ЕС, ОЭСР, временной интервал расчета: 1992-2007 гг. Исследование показало невысокую эффективность отечественного сельского хозяйства по сравнению со странами СНГ и относительно большой технологический разрыв с развитыми странами, который имеет тенденцию к сокращению. Оценки также указывают на рост эффективности российского аграрного сектора на пространстве СНГ за временным пределом основного исследования.

Based on the data envelopment analysis methodology applied in the cross-country context with a metafrontier approach and window analysis, the article provides a technical efficiency estimate of the Russian agriculture. The group of countries included in the study comprises the CIS, BRIC, EU, and OECD members. The time interval is 1992-2007. The research has revealed low efficiency of the Russian agriculture among the CIS members and a relatively large technology gap with respect to advanced economies, but which tends to decline. The estimates also indicate growth of the Russian agricultural sector efficiency within the CIS beyond the time interval of the research.

техническая эффективностьсельское хозяйствотехнологический разрывРоссияdata envelopment analysisDEASBM модельdata envelopment analysisDEAtechnical efficiencyagricultureSBM modeltechnology gapRussiaReferencesAsmild M., Paradi J. C., Aggarwall V., Schaffnit C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 67-89.Asmild M., Paradi J. C., Aggarwall V., Schaffnit C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 67-89.Battese G. E., Rao D. S. P., O’Donnell C. J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 91-103.Battese G. E., Rao D. S. P., O’Donnell C. J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 91-103.Charnes A., Clark C. T., Cooper W. W., Golany B. (1985). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 95-112.Charnes A., Clark C. T., Cooper W. W., Golany B. (1985). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 95-112.Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444.Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444.Coelli T. J., Rao D. S. P. (2005). Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: A Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 32, No. s1, pp. 115-134.Coelli T. J., Rao D. S. P. (2005). Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: A Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980-2000. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 32, No. s1, pp. 115-134.Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Tone K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEAsolver software. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Tone K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEAsolver software. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Zhu J. (eds.) (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Zhu J. (eds.) (2011). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Dyson R. G., Allen R., Camanho A. S., Podinovski V. V., Sarrico C. S., Shale E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 245-259.Dyson R. G., Allen R., Camanho A. S., Podinovski V. V., Sarrico C. S., Shale E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 245-259.Emrouznejad A., Parker B. R., Tavares G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 151-157.Emrouznejad A., Parker B. R., Tavares G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 151-157.Farrell M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 253-281.Farrell M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 253-281.IMF (2015). World economic outlook, April 2015: Uneven growth: Shortand longterm factors. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.IMF (2015). World economic outlook, April 2015: Uneven growth: Shortand longterm factors. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.O’Donnell C. J., Rao D. S. P., Battese G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 231-255.O’Donnell C. J., Rao D. S. P., Battese G. E. (2008). Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios. Empirical Economics, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 231-255.Ravn M. O., Uhlig H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 371-376.Ravn M. O., Uhlig H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 371-376.Ray S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Ray S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: Theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Tone K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 498-509.Tone K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 498-509.Tone K. (2011). Slacks-based measure of efficiency. In: W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, J. Zhu (eds.). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 195-209.Tone K. (2011). Slacks-based measure of efficiency. In: W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, J. Zhu (eds.). Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 195-209.Vlontzos G., Niavis S. (2014). Assessing the evolution of technical efficiency of agriculture in EU countries: Is there a role for the agenda 2000? In: C. Zopounidis, N. Kalogeras, K. Mattas, G. van Dijk, G. Baourakis (eds.). Agricultural cooperative management and policy: New robust, reliable and coherent modelling tools. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 339-351.Vlontzos G., Niavis S. (2014). Assessing the evolution of technical efficiency of agriculture in EU countries: Is there a role for the agenda 2000? In: C. Zopounidis, N. Kalogeras, K. Mattas, G. van Dijk, G. Baourakis (eds.). Agricultural cooperative management and policy: New robust, reliable and coherent modelling tools. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 339-351.Zhu J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. 3rd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Zhu J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. 3rd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.