<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2006-6-47-66</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-1748</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ МЫСЛИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Хайек versus Кейнс: дорога к примирению</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Hayek versus Keynes: The Road to Reconciliation</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Скидельски</surname><given-names>Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Skidelsky</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>профессор</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Уорвикский Университет</institution><country>Великобритания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>University of Warwick</institution><country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2006</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>06</month><year>2006</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2006</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2006</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1748">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1748</self-uri><abstract><p>Автор подробно анализирует разногласия между Дж. М. Кейнсом и Ф. фон Хайеком по политическим экономико-теоретическим вопросам. На обширном материале показывается, что как мыслители Кейнс и Хайек были близки, а их споры сыграли важную роль в истории экономической науки. Рассматривается вклад каждого из теоретиков в идеологическое обоснование либерализма.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The author analyzes disagreements between J. M. Keynes and F. von Hayek on political and economic matters. Using wide range of sources the author shows that Keynes and Hayek stood very close to each other as thinkers, whereas their disputes played an important role in the history of economic thought. The contribution of both theorists to the ideological justification of liberalism is considered.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Кейнс</kwd><kwd>Хайек</kwd><kwd>история экономической мысли</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Keynes</kwd><kwd>Hayek</kwd><kwd>history of economic thought</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кейнс Дж. М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. М.: Гелиос АРВ, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кейнс Дж. М. Общая теория занятости, процента и денег. М.: Гелиос АРВ, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайек Ф. фон. Дорога к рабству. М.: Новое издательство, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хайек Ф. фон. Дорога к рабству. М.: Новое издательство, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barry N. Hayek's Social and Economic Philosophy. L.: Macmillan, 1979.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barry N. Hayek's Social and Economic Philosophy. L.: Macmillan, 1979.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. L.: Macmillan/CUP, 1971-1989. Vol. XXVII (рус. пер.: Скидельски Р. Джон Мейнард Кейнс, 1883-1946: Экономист, философ, государственный деятель. М.: Московская школа политических исследований, 2005).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. L.: Macmillan/CUP, 1971-1989. Vol. XXVII (рус. пер.: Скидельски Р. Джон Мейнард Кейнс, 1883-1946: Экономист, философ, государственный деятель. М.: Московская школа политических исследований, 2005).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keynes Papers / King's College, Cambridge, HP/2/88-100; 3/176-188.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keynes Papers / King's College, Cambridge, HP/2/88-100; 3/176-188.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
