<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2007-11-4-24</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-1667</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMIC THEORY AND PRACTICE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Экономика: наука и / или искусство</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics: Art and / or Science</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ананьин</surname><given-names>О.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ananyin</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, завкафедрой экономической методологии и истории ГУ-ВШЭ, руководитель Центра ИЭ РАН</p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГУ-ВШЭ; Институт экономики РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State University - Higher School of Economics; Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2007</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>11</month><year>2007</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>4</fpage><lpage>24</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2007</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2007</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1667">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1667</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена методологическому анализу прикладного экономического знания, его взаимоотношениям с теоретическим знанием. Выделяются этапы в истории взаимоотношений двух типов знания, подробно исследуются концепции искусства экономики Дж. С. Милля и Дж. Н. Кейнса, анализируются эпистемологические особенности прикладной экономики. Автор констатирует, что экономическая наука с момента своего зарождения была теснейшим образом связана с практикой. В анализе прикладной экономики сделан акцент на искусстве экономики как на способности отбора и комбинирования научных знаний для решения практических проблем. Эта специфическая область знаний должна, по мнению автора, занять особое место не только в рамках современной экономической науки в России, но и в системе высшего образования.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article provides methodological analysis of applied economic knowledge and its relationships with theoretical knowledge. Stages in the history of these relationships are identified. The article considers in detail methodological ideas of J. S. Mill and J. N. Keynes (who proposed the "art of economics" as a part of economic science). The paper also analyzes epistemological features of applied economics. The author states that economic science was from the beginning tightly connected with practice. In the analysis of applied economics the author emphasizes the art of economics as the faculty to select and combine scientific knowledge to solve concrete problems. This specific field of knowledge, according to the author, should play an important role not only within modern academic discourse in Russia, but also within the system of higher education.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экономическая методология</kwd><kwd>история экономической мысли</kwd><kwd>Милль</kwd><kwd>Кейнс</kwd><kwd>прикладная экономика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>economic methodology</kwd><kwd>history of economic thought</kwd><kwd>Mill</kwd><kwd>Keynes</kwd><kwd>applied economics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Блауг М. Методология экономической науки, или Как экономисты объясняют. М.: НП «Журнал Вопросы экономики», 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Блауг М. Методология экономической науки, или Как экономисты объясняют. М.: НП «Журнал Вопросы экономики», 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дмитриева О. Г. Региональная экономическая диагностика. СПб.: СПУЭиФ, 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Дмитриева О. Г. Региональная экономическая диагностика. СПб.: СПУЭиФ, 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кейнс Д. Н. Предмет и метод политической экономии. М.: И. А. Баландин, 1899.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кейнс Д. Н. Предмет и метод политической экономии. М.: И. А. Баландин, 1899.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Книс К. Политическая экономия с исторической точки зрения (1883) // Предмет и метод / Сост. С. И. Солнцев. Л.: Путь к знанию, 1924.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Книс К. Политическая экономия с исторической точки зрения (1883) // Предмет и метод / Сост. С. И. Солнцев. Л.: Путь к знанию, 1924.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Корнаи Я. Здоровье наций. Размышления об аналогиях между экономикой и медициной // ЭКО.1987. № 9. С. 150-166.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Корнаи Я. Здоровье наций. Размышления об аналогиях между экономикой и медициной // ЭКО.1987. № 9. С. 150-166.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лидблом Ч. Э. Политика и рынки. Политико-экономические системы мира. М.: ИКСИ. 2005 (1977).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лидблом Ч. Э. Политика и рынки. Политико-экономические системы мира. М.: ИКСИ. 2005 (1977).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маршалл А. Принципы экономической науки. Т. 1. М.: Прогресс. 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Маршалл А. Принципы экономической науки. Т. 1. М.: Прогресс. 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Менгер К. Исследования о методах социальных наук и политической экономии в особенности (1883). СПб., 1894.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Менгер К. Исследования о методах социальных наук и политической экономии в особенности (1883). СПб., 1894.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милль Д. С. Об определении предмета политической экономии и о методе исследования, свойственном ей // Милль Д. С. Основы политической экономии… М.: ЭКСМО, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Милль Д. С. Об определении предмета политической экономии и о методе исследования, свойственном ей // Милль Д. С. Основы политической экономии… М.: ЭКСМО, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милль Д. Ст. Система логики силлогистической и индуктивной. 2-е изд. / Пер. с англ. В. Н. Ивановского. М.: Издание Г. А. Лемана, 1914.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Милль Д. Ст. Система логики силлогистической и индуктивной. 2-е изд. / Пер. с англ. В. Н. Ивановского. М.: Издание Г. А. Лемана, 1914.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений. М.: Финстатинформ, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений. М.: Финстатинформ, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Риккерт Г. Науки о природе и науки о культуре. М.: Республика, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Риккерт Г. Науки о природе и науки о культуре. М.: Республика, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.: ЭКСМО, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.: ЭКСМО, 2007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Степин В.С. Теоретическое знание. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Степин В.С. Теоретическое знание. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайек Ф. Контрреволюция науки. Этюды о злоупотреблениях разумом. М.: ОГИ, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хайек Ф. Контрреволюция науки. Этюды о злоупотреблениях разумом. М.: ОГИ, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шмоллер Г. Народное хозяйство, наука о народном хозяйстве и ее методы. Хозяйство, нравы и право. Разделение труда (1893). М.: Издание К. Т. Солдатенкова, 1902.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шмоллер Г. Народное хозяйство, наука о народном хозяйстве и ее методы. Хозяйство, нравы и право. Разделение труда (1893). М.: Издание К. Т. Солдатенкова, 1902.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. А. История экономического анализа. СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шумпетер Й. А. История экономического анализа. СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. А. Капитализм, социализм, демократия. М.: Экономика, 1996.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шумпетер Й. А. Капитализм, социализм, демократия. М.: Экономика, 1996.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Щедровицкий Г. П. Методологический смысл оппозиции натуралистического и системодеятельностного подходов (1991) // Избранные труды. М.: Школа культурной политики, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Щедровицкий Г. П. Методологический смысл оппозиции натуралистического и системодеятельностного подходов (1991) // Избранные труды. М.: Школа культурной политики, 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Angner E. Economists as Experts: Overconfidence in Theory and Practice // Journal of Economic Methodology. 2006. Vol. 13, No 1. P. 1-24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Angner E. Economists as Experts: Overconfidence in Theory and Practice // Journal of Economic Methodology. 2006. Vol. 13, No 1. P. 1-24.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Backhouse R., Biddle J. The Concept of Applied Economics: a History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings // Toward a History of Applied Economics / Backhouse R., Biddle J. (eds.) Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Backhouse R., Biddle J. The Concept of Applied Economics: a History of Ambiguity and Multiple Meanings // Toward a History of Applied Economics / Backhouse R., Biddle J. (eds.) Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Basu K. On Misunderstanding Government: An Analysis of the Art of Policy Advice // Economics and Politics. 1997. Vol. 9, No 3. P. 231-250.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Basu K. On Misunderstanding Government: An Analysis of the Art of Policy Advice // Economics and Politics. 1997. Vol. 9, No 3. P. 231-250.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Begg I., Henry B. Introduction // Applied Economics and Public Policy DAE occasional paper No 63 / Begg I., Henry B. (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Begg I., Henry B. Introduction // Applied Economics and Public Policy DAE occasional paper No 63 / Begg I., Henry B. (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coates J. The Claims of Common Sense: Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coates J. The Claims of Common Sense: Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. From Muddling through to the Economics of Control:Views of Applied Policy from J. N. Keynes to Abba Lerner // Middlebury College Economics Discussion Papers. No 04-21. 2004. http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0421.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. From Muddling through to the Economics of Control:Views of Applied Policy from J. N. Keynes to Abba Lerner // Middlebury College Economics Discussion Papers. No 04-21. 2004. http://www.middlebury.edu/services/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0421.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. The Lost Art of Economics // The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. The Lost Art of Economics // The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colander D. The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colander D. The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Comim F. The Scottish Tradition in Economics and the Role of Common sense in Adam Smith's Thought // Review of Political Economy. 2002. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 91-113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Comim F. The Scottish Tradition in Economics and the Role of Common sense in Adam Smith's Thought // Review of Political Economy. 2002. Vol. 14, No 1. P. 91-113.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cunningham W. A Plea for Pure Theory // The Economic Review. 1892. Vol. 2. Reprinted in: The Methodology of Economics: Nineteenth-Century British Contributions. Vol. VII: Marshall and Cunningham / Backhouse R. (ed.) L.: Routledge and Thoemmes Press, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cunningham W. A Plea for Pure Theory // The Economic Review. 1892. Vol. 2. Reprinted in: The Methodology of Economics: Nineteenth-Century British Contributions. Vol. VII: Marshall and Cunningham / Backhouse R. (ed.) L.: Routledge and Thoemmes Press, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">David P. Path-dependence, its Critics and the Quest for 'Historical Economics' // Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas / Garrouste P., Ioannides S. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">David P. Path-dependence, its Critics and the Quest for 'Historical Economics' // Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas / Garrouste P., Ioannides S. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dean Ph. The Scope and Method of Economic Science // Economic Journal. 1983. Vol. 93. P. 1-12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dean Ph. The Scope and Method of Economic Science // Economic Journal. 1983. Vol. 93. P. 1-12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dow A., Dow S., Hutton A. Applied economics in a Political economy tradition: The Сase of Scotland from the 1890s to the 1950s // Toward a History of Applied Economics / Backhouse R., Biddle J. (eds.) Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dow A., Dow S., Hutton A. Applied economics in a Political economy tradition: The Сase of Scotland from the 1890s to the 1950s // Toward a History of Applied Economics / Backhouse R., Biddle J. (eds.) Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Economic Policy under Uncertainty. The Role of Truth and Accountability in Policy Advice / Mooslechner P. e.a. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Economic Policy under Uncertainty. The Role of Truth and Accountability in Policy Advice / Mooslechner P. e.a. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Empirical Models and Policy-making: Interaction and Institutions / Den Butter F. G., Morgan M. S.(eds.). London etc.: Routledge, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Empirical Models and Policy-making: Interaction and Institutions / Den Butter F. G., Morgan M. S.(eds.). London etc.: Routledge, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goodwin C. D. W. Economics and Economists in the Policy Process // A Companion to the History of Economic Thought / Samuels W. e.a. (eds.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2003. P. 606-621.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goodwin C. D. W. Economics and Economists in the Policy Process // A Companion to the History of Economic Thought / Samuels W. e.a. (eds.) Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2003. P. 606-621.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hands D. W. The Methodology of Empirical Science Economics: A Closer Look // Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics / Hoover K., Sheffrin S. (eds.) Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995. P. 225-257.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hands D. W. The Methodology of Empirical Science Economics: A Closer Look // Monetarism and the Methodology of Economics / Hoover K., Sheffrin S. (eds.) Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1995. P. 225-257.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harrod R. Scope and Method of Economics // The Economic Journal. 1938. Vol. 48, No 191.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harrod R. Scope and Method of Economics // The Economic Journal. 1938. Vol. 48, No 191.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Institutional Design / Weimer D. L. (ed.) Boston: Kluwer Academic Press, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Institutional Design / Weimer D. L. (ed.) Boston: Kluwer Academic Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim W., Jegadeesh N. Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions // Working Paper 12866 / NBER. 2007. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12866.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim W., Jegadeesh N. Do Analysts Herd? An Analysis of Recommendations and Market Reactions // Working Paper 12866 / NBER. 2007. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12866.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knight F. The Limitation of Scientific Method in Economics // The Trend of Economics / Tugwell R.G. (ed.) N.Y.: Alfred Knopf, 1924.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knight F. The Limitation of Scientific Method in Economics // The Trend of Economics / Tugwell R.G. (ed.) N.Y.: Alfred Knopf, 1924.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lange O. The Scope and Method of Economics // Review of Economic Studies. 1945-1946. Vol. 13, No 1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lange O. The Scope and Method of Economics // Review of Economic Studies. 1945-1946. Vol. 13, No 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leslie C. The Known and the Unknown in the Economic World // Methodology of Economics: Nineteenth-Century British Contributions. Vol. V / Backhouse R. (ed.) L.: Routledge and Thoemmes Press, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leslie C. The Known and the Unknown in the Economic World // Methodology of Economics: Nineteenth-Century British Contributions. Vol. V / Backhouse R. (ed.) L.: Routledge and Thoemmes Press, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Machlup F. Positive and normative economics: An analysis of the ideas // Economic Means and Social Ends / Heilbroner R. (ed.) Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Machlup F. Positive and normative economics: An analysis of the ideas // Economic Means and Social Ends / Heilbroner R. (ed.) Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mayer Th. Truth versus Precision in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mayer Th. Truth versus Precision in Economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mill J. S. On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Nethod of Investigation Proper to It // Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. L.: John W. Parker, 1844.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mill J. S. On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Nethod of Investigation Proper to It // Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. L.: John W. Parker, 1844.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moore G. John Neville Keynes's solution to the English Methodenstreit // Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2003. Vol. 25, No 1. P. 5-38.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moore G. John Neville Keynes's solution to the English Methodenstreit // Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2003. Vol. 25, No 1. P. 5-38.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O'Flaherty B., Bhagwati J. Will Free Trade with Political Science Put Normative Economists Out of Work? // Economics and Politics. 1997. Vol. 9, No 3. P. 207-219.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O'Flaherty B., Bhagwati J. Will Free Trade with Political Science Put Normative Economists Out of Work? // Economics and Politics. 1997. Vol. 9, No 3. P. 207-219.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roth A. The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics // Econometrica. 2002. Vol. 70, No 4. P. 1341-1378.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roth A. The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics // Econometrica. 2002. Vol. 70, No 4. P. 1341-1378.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sen A. Description as Сhoice // Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press, 1982.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sen A. Description as Сhoice // Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press, 1982.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Slembeck T. Ideologies, Beliefs, and Economic Advice -a Cognitive-evolutionary View on Economic Policy-making // The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy / Pelikan P., Wegner G. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Slembeck T. Ideologies, Beliefs, and Economic Advice -a Cognitive-evolutionary View on Economic Policy-making // The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy / Pelikan P., Wegner G. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Art of Monetary Policy / Colander D. e.a. (eds.) Armonk: Sharpe, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Art of Monetary Policy / Colander D. e.a. (eds.) Armonk: Sharpe, 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics / Colander D. (ed.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics / Colander D. (ed.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy / Pelikan P., Wegner G. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy / Pelikan P., Wegner G. (eds.) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Toward a History of Applied Economics: Annual Supplement to vol. 32 of the "History of Political Economy" / Backhouse R., Biddle J. (eds.) Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Toward a History of Applied Economics: Annual Supplement to vol. 32 of the "History of Political Economy" / Backhouse R., Biddle J. (eds.) Durham: Duke University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
