voprecotestВопросы экономикиVoprosy Ekonomiki0042-8736Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP10.32609/0042-8736-2007-9-121-138voprecotest-1651Research ArticleК 140-ЛЕТИЮ ВЫХОДА В СВЕТ I ТОМА «КАПИТАЛА» К. МАРКСАTO THE 140th ANNIVERSARY OF PUBLISHING VOLUME I OF “CAPITAL” BY K. MARXЧто такое аналитический марксизм?What is Analytical Marxism?РайтЭ. О.WrightE. O.

профессор

Висконсинский университет в МадисонеСоединённые Штаты АмерикиUniversity of Wisconsin - MadisonUnited States20072009200709121138Copyright © Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 20072007Voprosy Ekonomiki, NPVoprosy Ekonomiki, NPhttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNoticehttps://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1651

В работе известного социолога, одного из основных представителей аналитического марксизма, анализируется это направление социальной и экономической мысли, возникшее в конце 1970-х годов. Автор кратко прослеживает историю аналитического марксизма, а также выявляет его характерные особенности, отличающие его как от неоклассической традиции, так и от различных неортодоксальных школ. В работе показано, какова связь аналитического марксизма с учением Маркса, как интерпретируется теория Маркса сегодня и какое влияние аналитический марксизм оказал на современную социальную и экономическую мысль.

The paper written by a famous sociologist, one of the main advocates of analytical Marxism, analyzes this school of social and economic thought which emerged in the end of the 1970s. The author briefly outlines the history of analytical Marxism and explicates its distinctive characteristics which distinguish it from both neoclassical tradition and different heterodox schools of thought. The paper also shows the connections between analytical Marxism and Marxist theory. The author discusses modern interpretations of Marx’s conceptions and the influence of analytical Marxism on contemporary social and economic thought.

Марксмарксизмистория экономической мыслинеортодоксальная экономическая теорияаналитический марксизмMarxMarxismhistory of economic thoughtheterodox economicsanalytical MarxismReferencesAnalytical Marxism / Roemer J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Analytical Marxism / Roemer J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press, 1978.Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press, 1978.Bhaskar R. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press, 1979.Bhaskar R. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press, 1979.Bowles S., Gintis H. Democracy and Capitalism. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1986.Bowles S., Gintis H. Democracy and Capitalism. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1986.Bowles S., Gintis H. Contested Exchange // Politics & Society. 1990. Vol. 18, No 2. P. 165-222.Bowles S., Gintis H. Contested Exchange // Politics & Society. 1990. Vol. 18, No 2. P. 165-222.Brenner B. The agrarian Roots of European Capitalism // The Brenner Debate / Aston T. H., Philpon C. H. E. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. P. 2 13-327.Brenner B. The agrarian Roots of European Capitalism // The Brenner Debate / Aston T. H., Philpon C. H. E. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. P. 2 13-327.Burawoy M. Marxism without Micro-foundations // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 53-86.Burawoy M. Marxism without Micro-foundations // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 53-86.Burawoy M. Politics and Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. L.: Verso, 1985.Burawoy M. Politics and Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. L.: Verso, 1985.Burawoy M. Should We Give Up on Socialism? // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 1. P. 58-76.Burawoy M. Should We Give Up on Socialism? // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 1. P. 58-76.Carchedi G. Class Analysis and Social Research. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Carchedi G. Class Analysis and Social Research. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Carling A. Rational Choice Marxism // New Left Review. 1986. No 160. P. 24-62.Carling A. Rational Choice Marxism // New Left Review. 1986. No 160. P. 24-62.Cohen G. A. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: a Defense. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Cohen G. A. Karl Marx’s Theory of History: a Defense. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Cohen G. A. The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom // Analytical Marxism / Roemer J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Cohen G. A. The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom // Analytical Marxism / Roemer J. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Cohen G. History, Labor and Freedom. Oxford, 1989.Cohen G. History, Labor and Freedom. Oxford, 1989.Cohen J., Rogers J. On Democracy. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983.Cohen J., Rogers J. On Democracy. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1983.Elster J. Logic and Society. Contradictions and Possible Worlds. N.Y.: John Wiley, 1978.Elster J. Logic and Society. Contradictions and Possible Worlds. N.Y.: John Wiley, 1978.Elster J. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Elster J. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Jacoby R. The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of the Academe. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1987.Jacoby R. The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of the Academe. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1987.Kamolnick P. Classes: a Marxist Critique. N.Y.: General Hall, Inc., 1988.Kamolnick P. Classes: a Marxist Critique. N.Y.: General Hall, Inc., 1988.Levine A. Arguing for Socialism. L.: Routledge and Kegan. Paul, 1984.Levine A. Arguing for Socialism. L.: Routledge and Kegan. Paul, 1984.Levine A. The End of the State. L.: Verso, 1987.Levine A. The End of the State. L.: Verso, 1987.Levine A., Sober E., Wright E. O. Marxism and Methodological Individualism // New Left Review. 1987. No 162. P. 67-84.Levine A., Sober E., Wright E. O. Marxism and Methodological Individualism // New Left Review. 1987. No 162. P. 67-84.Levine A., Sober E., Wright E. O. Reconstructing Marxism. L.: Verso, 1992.Levine A., Sober E., Wright E. O. Reconstructing Marxism. L.: Verso, 1992.Miller R. W. Analyzing Marx. Morality, Power, and History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Miller R. W. Analyzing Marx. Morality, Power, and History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Parijs Ph. van. Evolutionary Explanation in the Social Sciences: an Emerging Paradigm. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1981.Parijs Ph. van. Evolutionary Explanation in the Social Sciences: an Emerging Paradigm. Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1981.Przeworski A. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Przeworski A. Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Przeworski A. Class Production and Politics: a Reply to Burawoy // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 87-111.Przeworski A. Class Production and Politics: a Reply to Burawoy // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 2. P. 87-111.Resnick S., Wolff R. Knowledge and Class. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.Resnick S., Wolff R. Knowledge and Class. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.Roemer J. A. General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Roemer J. A. General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Roemer J. Should Marxists be Interested in Exploitation? // Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1985. No 14.Roemer J. Should Marxists be Interested in Exploitation? // Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1985. No 14.Roemer J. Visions of Capitalism and Socialism // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 93-100.Roemer J. Visions of Capitalism and Socialism // Socialist Review. 1989. Vol. 19, No 3. P. 93-100.Wright E. O. Classes. L.: New left Books, 1985.Wright E. O. Classes. L.: New left Books, 1985.Wright E. O. et al. The Debate on Classes. L.: Verso, 1989.Wright E. O. et al. The Debate on Classes. L.: Verso, 1989.Wright E. O. The Comparative Project on Class Structure and Class Consciousness: an Overview // Acta Sociologica. 1989. Vol. 32, No 1. P. 3-22.Wright E. O. The Comparative Project on Class Structure and Class Consciousness: an Overview // Acta Sociologica. 1989. Vol. 32, No 1. P. 3-22.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.