<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2007-4-46-59</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-1590</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ МЫСЛИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>О методе статистического исследования делового цикла. Ответ Дж. М. Кейнсу (Комментарий Дж. М. Кейнса)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Reply (With comment by J. M. Keynes)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тинберген</surname><given-names>Я.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tinbergen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2007</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>04</month><year>2007</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>46</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2007</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2007</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1590">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1590</self-uri><abstract><p>В своей ответной полемической статье Тинберген отстаивает применяемый им эконометрический метод. Он упрекает Кейнса в неточности, обосновывает применимость линейных соотношений в экономическом анализе и их существование в экономике, а также разъясняет некоторые методологические (прежде всего, касающиеся проблемы причинности) и экономические детали своего анализа. В комментарии к статье Тинбергена Кейнс уточняет свою точку зрения как по некоторым частным вопросам, так и по поводу эконометрики в целом.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In his polemic reply Tinbergen defends the econometric method he applied. He reproaches Keynes for the inaccuracy of his argument and justifies the applicability of linear relationships in economic analysis and their existence in economic interactions. Tinbergen also provides a detailed account of some methodological (primarily addressing the problem of causality) and economic issues of his analysis. In a comment to the Tinbergen’s paper Keynes clarifies his point of view on some particular points as well as on econometrics as a whole.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>история экономической мысли</kwd><kwd>экономическая теория</kwd><kwd>методология экономической науки</kwd><kwd>эконометрика</kwd><kwd>Кейнс</kwd><kwd>Тинберген</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>history of economic thought</kwd><kwd>economic theory</kwd><kwd>economic methodology</kwd><kwd>econometrics</kwd><kwd>Keynes</kwd><kwd>Tinbergen</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schultz H. The Theory and Measurement of Demand. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1938.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schultz H. The Theory and Measurement of Demand. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1938.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tinbergen J. (1939). Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories. A Method and its Application to Investment Activity. Vol. I. Geneva: League of Nations.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tinbergen J. (1939). Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories. A Method and its Application to Investment Activity. Vol. I. Geneva: League of Nations.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
