<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2008-12-60-71</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-1382</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВОПРОСЫ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ISSUES OF THEORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Экономика права: предпосылки возникновения и история развития</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Law and Economics: Origins and Development</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бальсевич</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Balsevich</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>младший научный сотрудник Лаборатории институционального анализа, старший преподаватель кафедры институциональной экономики</p><p> </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГУ-ВШЭ</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State University - Higher School of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2008</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>12</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>60</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2008</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2008</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1382">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1382</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье представлен анализ основных этапов формирования и развития экономики права, которые во многом определяют современное состояние этой дисциплины: на сегодняшний день экономика права объединяет различные школы и подходы. С одной стороны, наличие нескольких конкурирующих подходов в рамках одной дисциплины позволило существенно расширить ее границы, а с другой, - усилило неопределенность, связанную с выбором методологии анализа, и обострило внутренние противоречия. Различия в основных подходах демонстрируются на примере экономического анализа договорного права.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyzes the main stages of establishment and development of Law and Economics. The history of the discipline has had a considerable impact on its current state: today Law and Economics comprises different schools and approaches. On the one hand, the competition of approaches within the single discipline has broadened its scope, but on the other hand, it has intensified contradictions between the approaches and complicated the choice of methodological framework for the analysis. The differences between various approaches are explained basing on the example of the economic analysis of contract law.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>история экономической мысли</kwd><kwd>экономика права</kwd><kwd>чикагская школа экономики права</kwd><kwd>институциональная экономика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>history of economic thought</kwd><kwd>Law and Economics</kwd><kwd>Chicago school</kwd><kwd>institutional economics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">История экономических учений / Под ред. В. Автономова, О. Ананьина, Н. Макашевой. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">История экономических учений / Под ред. В. Автономова, О. Ананьина, Н. Макашевой. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Познер Р. Экономический анализ права. СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Познер Р. Экономический анализ права. СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эггертссон Т. Экономическое поведение и институты. М.: Дело, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Эггертссон Т. Экономическое поведение и институты. М.: Дело, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baird D. The Future of Law and Economics: Looking Forward // The University of Chicago Law Review. 1997. Vol. 64, No 4. P. 1129-1165.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baird D. The Future of Law and Economics: Looking Forward // The University of Chicago Law Review. 1997. Vol. 64, No 4. P. 1129-1165.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Calabresi G. About Law and Economics: a Letter to Ronald Dworkin // Hofstra Law Review. 1979-1980. Vol. 8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Calabresi G. About Law and Economics: a Letter to Ronald Dworkin // Hofstra Law Review. 1979-1980. Vol. 8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coase R. Law and Economics at Chicago // Journal of Law and Economics. 1993. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 239-254.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coase R. Law and Economics at Chicago // Journal of Law and Economics. 1993. Vol. 36, No 1. P. 239-254.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duxbury N. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duxbury N. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ellickson R.C. Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: a Critique of Classical Law and Economics // Chicago-Kent Law Review. 1989. Vol. 65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ellickson R.C. Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: a Critique of Classical Law and Economics // Chicago-Kent Law Review. 1989. Vol. 65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harris R. The Uses of History in Law and Economics // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2003. Vol. 4, No 2 P. 659-696.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harris R. The Uses of History in Law and Economics // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2003. Vol. 4, No 2 P. 659-696.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harris R. The Uses of History in Law and Economics // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2003. Vol. 4, No 2. P. 660.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harris R. The Uses of History in Law and Economics // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2003. Vol. 4, No 2. P. 660.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holmes O. W. The Path of the Law // Harvard Law Review. 1897. Vol. 10, No 8. P. 457-478.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Holmes O. W. The Path of the Law // Harvard Law Review. 1897. Vol. 10, No 8. P. 457-478.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hovenkamp H. Law and Economics in the United States: a Brief Historical Survey // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1995. Vol. 19. P. 331-352.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hovenkamp H. Law and Economics in the United States: a Brief Historical Survey // Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1995. Vol. 19. P. 331-352.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jolls C., Sunstein C.R., Thaler R. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics // Stanford Law Review.1998. Vol. 50. P. 1471-1547.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jolls C., Sunstein C.R., Thaler R. A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics // Stanford Law Review.1998. Vol. 50. P. 1471-1547.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kitch E. W. The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970 // The Journal of Law and Economics. 1983. Vol. 26, No 1. P. 163-234.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kitch E. W. The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970 // The Journal of Law and Economics. 1983. Vol. 26, No 1. P. 163-234.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kitch E. W. The Intellectual Foundations of Law and Economics // Journal of Legal Education. 1984. Vol. 33. P. 184-196.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kitch E. W. The Intellectual Foundations of Law and Economics // Journal of Legal Education. 1984. Vol. 33. P. 184-196.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leff A. A. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism // Virginia Law Review. 1974. Vol. 60, No 3 P. 451-482.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leff A. A. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism // Virginia Law Review. 1974. Vol. 60, No 3 P. 451-482.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Llewellyn K. N. The Effect of Legal Institutions upon Economics // American Economic Review. 1925. Vol. 15, No 4. P. 665-683.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Llewellyn K. N. The Effect of Legal Institutions upon Economics // American Economic Review. 1925. Vol. 15, No 4. P. 665-683.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mackaay E. History of Law and Economics // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics / B. Bouckaert, G. De Geest (eds.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000. P. 65-117.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mackaay E. History of Law and Economics // Encyclopedia of Law and Economics / B. Bouckaert, G. De Geest (eds.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000. P. 65-117.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manne H. G. How Law and Economics Was Marketed in a Hostile World: a Very Personal History // The Origins of Law and Economics: Essays By The Founding Fathers / F. Parisi, C. K. Rowley (eds.). 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manne H. G. How Law and Economics Was Marketed in a Hostile World: a Very Personal History // The Origins of Law and Economics: Essays By The Founding Fathers / F. Parisi, C. K. Rowley (eds.). 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mercuro N., Medema S.G. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism and Beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mercuro N., Medema S.G. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism and Beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Posner R. A. The Law and Economics Movement // American Economic Review. 1987. Vol. 77, No 2. P. 1-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Posner R. A. The Law and Economics Movement // American Economic Review. 1987. Vol. 77, No 2. P. 1-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Richardson M. The Second Wave in Context // The Second Wave of Law and Economics / M. Richardson, G. Hadfield (eds.). Annandale: The Federation Press, 1999. P. 2-10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Richardson M. The Second Wave in Context // The Second Wave of Law and Economics / M. Richardson, G. Hadfield (eds.). Annandale: The Federation Press, 1999. P. 2-10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rizzo M. J. The Mirage of Efficiency // Hofstra Law Review. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 641-658.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rizzo M. J. The Mirage of Efficiency // Hofstra Law Review. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 641-658.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Round and Round the Bramble Bush: from Legal Realism to Critical Legal Scholarship // Harvard Law Review. 1982. Vol. 95, No 7. P. 1677.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Round and Round the Bramble Bush: from Legal Realism to Critical Legal Scholarship // Harvard Law Review. 1982. Vol. 95, No 7. P. 1677.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rowley C. K. An Intellectual History of Law and Economics: 1739-2003 // The Origins of Law and Economics / F. Parisi, C. K. Rowley (eds.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005. P. 3-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rowley C. K. An Intellectual History of Law and Economics: 1739-2003 // The Origins of Law and Economics / F. Parisi, C. K. Rowley (eds.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2005. P. 3-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rowley C. K. Public Choice and the Economic Analysis of Law // Law and Economics / N. Mercuro (ed.). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rowley C. K. Public Choice and the Economic Analysis of Law // Law and Economics / N. Mercuro (ed.). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ulen T. S. Law and Economics: Settled Issues and Open Questions // Law and Economics / N. Mercuro (ed.). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulen T. S. Law and Economics: Settled Issues and Open Questions // Law and Economics / N. Mercuro (ed.). Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wacks R. Understanding Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wacks R. Understanding Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williamson O. E. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives // Administrtive Science Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 36, No 2. P. 269-296.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williamson O. E. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives // Administrtive Science Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 36, No 2. P. 269-296.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wonnel C. T. Contract Law and the Austrian School of Economics // Fordham Law Review. 1986. Vol. 54, No 4. P. 507-544.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wonnel C. T. Contract Law and the Austrian School of Economics // Fordham Law Review. 1986. Vol. 54, No 4. P. 507-544.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
