<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">voprecotest</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вопросы экономики</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Voprosy Ekonomiki</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0042-8736</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32609/0042-8736-2008-7-100-111</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">voprecotest-1328</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ НАУКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>METODOLOGY OF ECONOMIC SCIENCE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Онтология ортодоксальной экономической науки: проблемы построения и интерпретации</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ontology of Orthodox Economics: Problems of Construction and Interpretation</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Болдырев</surname><given-names>И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Boldyrev</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ассистент кафедры экономической методологии и истории</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ГУ-ВШЭ</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State University - Higher School of Economics</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2008</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>07</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>111</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP, 2008</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2008</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1328">https://www.vopreco.ru/jour/article/view/1328</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье обосновывается определение экономической онтологии (онтологии экономической науки) как учения о наиболее общих свойствах, категориях и структуре реальности, описываемой в экономических моделях. Отличая онтологию науки от онтологии хозяйственной жизни (поскольку последняя подменяет собой науку), автор подчеркивает роль экономической онтологии в разрешении теоретических споров и в прояснении философских и мировоззренческих особенностей экономической теории. В случае ортодоксальной экономической науки на роль формальной онтологии выдвигаются математика и математические структуры.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article justifies the definition of economic ontology (ontology of economics) as a study of the most general features, categories and structure which belong to reality described in economic models. The author distinguishes ontology of science from ontology of economic life (the latter often functions as a substitute for science) and points out that ontology plays a significant role in resolving theoretical debates and in making clear philosophical presuppositions of economic theory. In the case of orthodox theory mathematics and mathematical structures are suggested as formal ontology.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экономическая методология</kwd><kwd>философия экономической науки</kwd><kwd>социальная онтология</kwd><kwd>мейнстрим экономической теории</kwd><kwd>математическое моделирование в экономике</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>economic methodology</kwd><kwd>philosophy of economics</kwd><kwd>social ontology</kwd><kwd>economic mainstream</kwd><kwd>mathematical modeling</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ананьин О. И. Структура экономико-теоретического знания: методологический анализ. М.: Наука, 2005. Бурбаки Н. Архитектура математики // Очерки по истории математики. М.: ИЛ, 1963.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ананьин О. И. Структура экономико-теоретического знания: методологический анализ. М.: Наука, 2005. Бурбаки Н. Архитектура математики // Очерки по истории математики. М.: ИЛ, 1963.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вальрас Л. Элементы чистой политической экономии. М.: Фонд «Либеральная миссия», 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Вальрас Л. Элементы чистой политической экономии. М.: Фонд «Либеральная миссия», 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лоусон Т. Экономика и действительность // Неприкосновенный запас. 2003. №2 (28).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лоусон Т. Экономика и действительность // Неприкосновенный запас. 2003. №2 (28).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лоусон Т. Современная «экономическая теория» в свете реализма // Вопросы экономики. 2006. №2. С. 75-98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лоусон Т. Современная «экономическая теория» в свете реализма // Вопросы экономики. 2006. №2. С. 75-98.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нуреев Р. Предпосылки новой экономической парадигмы: онтология и гносеология // Вопросы экономики. 1993. № 4. С. 131-144.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Нуреев Р. Предпосылки новой экономической парадигмы: онтология и гносеология // Вопросы экономики. 1993. № 4. С. 131-144.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Серл Дж. Что такое институт? // Вопросы экономики. 2007. № 8. С. 5-27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Серл Дж. Что такое институт? // Вопросы экономики. 2007. № 8. С. 5-27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Badiou A. L'Être et l'événement. P.: Seuil, 1988.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Badiou A. L'Être et l'événement. P.: Seuil, 1988.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cartwright N. Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio-Economic Machines // The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics / U. Mäki (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cartwright N. Ceteris Paribus Laws and Socio-Economic Machines // The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics / U. Mäki (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coase R. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. P. 3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coase R. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988. P. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dupr J. Economics without Mechanism // The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dupr J. Economics without Mechanism // The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lawson T. Economics and reality. L.: Routledge, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lawson T. Economics and reality. L.: Routledge, 1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lawson T. Reorienting economics. L.: Routledge, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lawson T. Reorienting economics. L.: Routledge, 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science / Morgan M. S., Morrison M. (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science / Morgan M. S., Morrison M. (eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sent E.-M. Sargent's symmetry saga: ontological versus technical constraints // The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics / U. Mäki (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sent E.-M. Sargent's symmetry saga: ontological versus technical constraints // The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics / U. Mäki (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
